财务报表分析外文文献及翻译

财务报表分析外文文献及翻译

LNTU---Acc

附录A

财务报表分析的杠杆左右以及如何体现盈利性和值比率

摘要

关键词:财政杠杆;运营债务杠杆;股本回报率;值比率

传统观点认为，杠杆效应是从金融活动中产生的:公司通过借贷来增加运营的资金。

杠杆作用的衡量标准是负债总额与股东权益。然而，一些负债——如银行贷款和发行的债券，是由于资金筹措，其他一些负债——如贸易应付账款，预收收入和退休金负债，是由于在运营过程中与供应商的贸易，与顾客和雇佣者在结算过程中产生的负债。融资负债通常交易运作良好的资本市场其中的发行者是随行就市的商人。与此相反，在运营中公司能够实现高增值。因为业务涉及的是与资本市场相比，不太完善的贸易的输入和输出的市场。

因此，考虑到股票估值，运营负债和融资负债的区别的产生有一些先验的原因。我们研究在资产负债表上，运营负债中的一美元是否与融资中的一美元等值这个问题。因为运营负债和融资负债是股票价值的组成部分，这个问题就相当于问是否股价与账面价值比率是否取决于账面净值的组成。价格与账面比率是由预期回报率的账面价值决定的。所以，如果部分的账面价值要求不同的溢价，他们必须显示出不同的账面价值的预期回报率。因此，

标准的财务报表分析的能够区分股东从运营中和借贷的融资业务中产生的利润。因此，资产回报有别于股本回报率，这种差异是由于杠杆作用。然而，在标准的分析中，经营负债不区别于融资负债。因此，为了制定用于实证分析的规范，

我们的研究结果是用于愿意分析预期公司的收益和账面收益率。这些预测和估值依赖于负债的组成。

这篇文章结构如下。第一部分概述并指出了了能够判别两种杠杆作用类型，连接杠杆作用和盈利的财务报表分析第二节将杠杆作用，股票价值和价格与账面比率联系在一起。

第三节中进行实证分析，第四节进行了概述与结论。

1 杠杆作用的财务报表分析

以下财务报表分析将融资债务和运营债务对股东权益的影响区别开。这个分析从实证的详细分析中得出了精确的杠杆效应等式

普通股产权资本收益率=综合所得?普通股本

(1) 杠杆影响到这个盈利等式的分子和分母。适当的财务报表分析解析了杠杆作用的影响。以下分析是通过确定经营和融资活动中的资产负债表和损益表的组成开始分析。计算每一项活动所获得的利润，然后引入两种类型的杠杆作用来解释运营和融资的盈利以及股东的总体盈利。

1.1 区分运营和融资过程中的盈利

普通股权=经营资产，金融负债,经营负债,金融负债

(2) 侧重于普通股(以便优先股被视为融资债务)，资产负债表方程可重申如下:经营性资产的区别(如贸易应收款，库存和物业，厂房及设备)和金融资产(存款及可出售证券吸收多余现金)在其他方面。然而，债务方面，融资负债也区别于经营负债。不应该把所

有负债都当作融资负债来处理，相反，只有从运营中得到的现金，就像银行贷款，短期商业票据和债券属于这种类型。其他负债，如应付账款，累计费用，预收收入，重组债务和养老金负债，产生于业务。这种区别并不像当前与长远负债那么简单;养老金负债，例如，通常是长期，短期的借款是一种当前的负债。

等式的重排(2)

普通股权=(经营资产,经营负债),(金融资产,金融负债)

或者，

普通股权=净经营资产,净金融负债

(3)

这个等式的重排将资产和负债纳入经营和融资活动。净经营资产等于经营性资产减去经营负债。因此，一个公司可能在投资清单上的投资，但是投资清单上的投资者可以一定程度上给予信贷，投资清单上的投资就会减少。

企业支付工资，但在多大程度上工资的支付在退休金负债中递延，公司运营净投资就会减少。净融资债务是融资债务(包括优先股)减去金融资产。因此，一个公司可能会发行债券，以筹集资金，但也可能购买债券超额现金业务。事实上一个公司的可能是一个净债权者(更多的金融资产与金融负债比)，而不是净债务者。损益表可以重新区分来自运营和融资的收入。

综合净收入=运营收入,净额融资费用

(4) 运营收入是在生产经营中产生的，净额融资费用是在融资过程中产生的。金融资产的利息收入是与净财政收入中金融负债(包括优先股股息)的利息支出相抵消的。如果利息收入大于利息支出，融资活动产生净财政收入，而不是净财务支出。两种运营收入和净财务支出(或收入)是按照税后计算的。

等式(3)和(4)清楚的计算了税后的运营利润和借贷率

净资产回报率=运营收入?运营净资产

(5) 可供营运的资产净额=净资产支出?净资产债务。

(6) 净资产回报率显示出收益必须是在净资产投资基础上。因此，公司可以通过说服供应商在业务过程中给予或延长信贷条件提高其经营盈利，信贷会减少投资

股东本来要在业务上的投资。相应地，从分母排除不计息负债后，净借款利率给出了适当的融资活动贷款利率。

值得注意的是，净资产收益率不同于较常见的资产收益率(资产回报率)，通常被定义为总资产在税后利息前的收入。资产收益率没有很好的区分运营和融资过程。不像资产收益率，净资产收益率不包括分母中的金融资产，并且减去了运营负债。尼萨姆和彭曼

(2001)报告中指出纽约证券交易所和美国证券交易公司在1963-1999年间的平均资产收益率只有6.8%，但平均净资产收益率是10.0%，后者更接近人们在商业运营中所期望的回报值。

1.2 财务杠杆作用和其对股东盈利的影响

从式(3)到式(6)可以推算出来运用资本报酬率是净资产收益率和净借贷率

平均值。资本收益率=[净经营资产?普通股权×净资产回报率],[净金融负债?普通股权×

净借款利率] (7)

另外代数方程式可以得出下列杠杆:

资本收益率=净资产收益率，[财务杠杆×(净资产收益率,境借款利率)] (8) 从金融活动出发计算财务杠杆如下:

财务杠杆=净金融负债?普通股权

(9) 财务杠杆作用排除了运营负债，但是包括(作为净反对融资的债务)金融资产。如果金融资产大于融资负债，财务杠杆作用是负的。杠杆等式(8)是在财务杠杆为负的情况下使用的(在这种情况下，净借贷率是净金融资产回报率)。这个分析将股东收益分成运营获益和融资获益。财务杠杆凌驾于运用资本报酬率和净资产收益率之上，其中杠杆效应由财务杠杆决定，由净资产收益率和借贷率调节。这个调节可以是正向的，也可以是负向的。

1.3 运营债务杠杆作用和它对运营收益的影响

资金债务控制已动用资本回报率，运营债务控制运营中的收益，净资产收益。所以，一个公司的运营负债与运营资产相关性越大，在运营收入一定的情况下，它的净资产收益越高。在投资中，运营负债的应用频率就是运营杠杆作用。

利用运营负债来衡量运营中的收益率可能不太准确，但是，有一个分子对运营收入有影响。供应商提供名义上可免息贷款，但向用户收费但最终对于该信贷提供价格较高的商品和服务。这是为什么运营负债是运营方面不可分割的一部分而不是融资的一部分。供应商对信贷的收费很难量化，但是市场借贷率是可以观察到的。在这个借贷率下，供应商对信贷的隐性收费是可以估计的。

运营负债的市场利率=运营负债×市场借贷率

(10) 市场借贷率，因为大多数是短期信贷，可以看作近似的税后短期借贷利率。这个隐性成本是一个标准，因为它使得供货商在提供信贷时保持中立，供货商如果以借贷率提供信贷，或者公司买卖货物过程中的贸易借贷和资金购买中以借贷率成交的话，供货商将承担全部

损失。

为了分析运营债务杠杆对运营盈利的影响，定义如下:

经营资产收益率=(经营收入，经营负债的市场利率)?经营资产

(11) 经营资产收益率的计算因子是随着所有贸易信贷的隐性成本带来的经营收入变动的。如果供应商完全承担信用的隐性成本，经营资产收益率是将要获得的经营资产的回报率没有经营负债杠杆。供应商不完全承担信用，经营资产收益率将权衡包括从供应商取得的有利的隐性信用条款的经营负债。

类似于资本收益率的平衡方程(8)，净经营资产回报率用可表示为:

净资产收益率=经营资产收益率，[经营负债杠杆×(经营资产收益率,市场借贷率)]

(12)

借贷率是税后短期利率。已知经营资产收益率，杠杆对盈利的影响就由运营债务杠杆的水平，来决定，而扩展是在经营资产收益率和短期的税后利率之间。像财务杠杆，影响可能是有利的或者是不利的:如果它的经营资产收益率小于市场借款利率，企业可以通过经营负债杠杆减少经营收益。然而，经营资产收益率也可能被经营负债率不同于市场贷款利率的隐性借贷成本影响。

1.4 杠杆作用和对股东收益的影响

经营负债和净财务负债结合进总杠杆的办法:

总杠杆=(净金融负债，经营负债)?普通股权

总负债的借款利率是:

总借款利息率=(经财务费用，经营负债的市场利率)?(净金融负债，经营负债) 资本收益率等于加权平均的净资产收益率与贷款利率之和，权重是与所有金融资产、净金融负债之和以及经营负债(负的)的总额分别成比例的。所以，类似的平衡方程(8)和(12):

资本收益率=净资产收益率，[总杠杆×(净资产收益率,总借款利率)] (13) 总之，运营和融资的财务报表分析有三个等式，(8)，(12)和(13)，这些等式是基于固定的结算关系，因此具有确定性:他们必须应用于某个公司的某个时间段。区分盈利来源的唯一要素是在财务分析上，运营和融资组成上有一个明确的区分。

2 杠杆、股权价值和值比率

上述的杠杆效应是被描述为对股东收益率的影响。我们感兴趣的不仅是对股东收益

率、资本收益率的影响，也是对在剩余价值模型方法上的与资本收益率有联系的净资产价值的影响。作为一个对股利折现模型的补充，剩余收入模型表示在日期0 (P0)的价值:

B是普通股的面值，X 是普通股的综合收益，r是投资资本所要求的回报。溢

价取决于预算剩余收入，剩余收入部分取决于与面值有关的相关收入，也就是预算的资本收益率。因此，对预算的资本收益率的杠杆作用(对股本回报的净影响)影响与面值有关的股权价值:所付的面值价格取决于预期面值收益率，即杠杆影响收益率。

所以我们的实证分析，探讨了杠杆对收益率和之比率的影响。或者换句话说，金融负债和经营负债是账面价值的不同组成部分，所以问题是是否账面价值的定价取决与账面价值的组成。在这种情况下，账面价值的不同组成可能导致不同的收益率。事实上，这两种分析(对收益率和值比率)是互补的。

金融负债是贷款偿还的合同义务。经营负债(像应付账款)包括合同义务，也包括应计负债(例如递延收入和应计费用)。应计债务可能基于合同条款，但通常包括估计我们考虑了实际效果的影响的收缩和会计估计。附录A合同实例和估计负债以及他们在可能性和价值方面的影响。

2.1合同负债的影响

‖的效果，融资和经营负债的流动性是远离平衡方程(8)，(12)和(13)。―事后

这些现象一直持续到事后，所以没有对于事后效果的问题。但是估价问题涉及到事后效果。以财政杠杆为出发点，对财务杠杆影响进行的广泛性研究，莫迪里亚尼和米勒召开了主题为完美资本市场，无税以及信息不对称对债务融资并无影响的会议。

在剩余收入的价值模型中，财务杠杆的增长取决于负债替代权益根据表达式(8)可能会提高预期资本收益率，但是，在估价增加抵消(14)以降低账面价值的股票，获得更高的流动性和增加超过所需的股本回报，总资产的价值(例如，股票和债券)未受影响。所需的股权回报的风险增加，因为增加了财务风险:杠杆可能有利，但

是较高的杠杆作用，更大的损失，对于股东来说，应利用RNOA少于借款利率来把杠杆转为事后不利。

在M&M主题的表面，对财务杠杆的价值影响的研究已经开始缓和主题所提出的状况。莫迪里亚尼和米勒(1963)假设债务增长的税收优惠和税后收益，增加股权价值。最近的实证研究提供支持这个假设(例如,Kemsley和Nissim,2002年)，但这个问题仍存在争议。

在任何情况下，经营负债的隐含成本，像金融负债的利息，是税务抵减额，杠杆组成不涉及税务。

债务在许多研究中被描绘为影响降低交易成本价值。当债务增加预期的破产费用和投资人和债权人的代理成本时，减少了股东在必须承担的主要管理的成本和降低股票的发行成本。我们预期这些考虑到适用于操作债务以及金融负债，与之不同的只有程度。事实上

彼德生和拉詹(1997)为这些解释提供一些测试。除了税，交易成本和代理成本对杠杆的解释,文章也研究了信息因素。罗斯(1977年)，他们和派尔(1977)认定财务选择作为区分成因和价值的标志，下文(例如, Myers and Majluf, 1984)将深入研究。其他研究的参考作用归咎于经营负债。例如，Biais和Gollier (1997年)和彼得森和拉詹(1997年)认为对比银行和债券市场中供应商有更多关于公司的信息，使更多的经营债务可能表明更高的价值。

另外，高贸易应付可能暗示支付供应商的困难和下降的财富。更多的来自于进一步放宽资本的完美无摩擦市场假设原来的M机电融资无关化。当涉及到业务，产品和投入市场的公司在其中贸易通常是竞争力不及资本市场。事实上，企业被视为主要是在增值业务，而不是融资活动因为比不过纯粹的竞争力的产品和投入市场。所以，难以赚钱的债券持有者，公司可以被看作是以贸易债权人赚钱。在行动上，企业可以施加垄断权力，从供应商和员工提取价值。供应商可能会提供廉价的隐性

融资来交换产品信息和该公司在市场的运作情况。他们也可能受益于效率的公司的供应和分配链，并可以给予信贷捕捉未来的业务。

2.2权责发生制会计的影响估计

应计负债可根据合同条款，但通常涉及估计。例如养老金债务，也是根据雇

佣合约，但涉及精算估计。递延收入可能涉及到的义务，为客户提供服务，而且还涉及估计，以及收入分配时期。虽然合同负债通常是进行资产负债表上作为一个不偏不倚的说明现金支付，应计制会计估计不一定是公正的。例如，保守的会计，可能夸大养老金负债或推迟收入更多者而不是合同要求客户。这种偏见大概不影响价值，但它们的影响分账返回和定价的负债相对于其账面价值(价格到账面价值比)。会计估计对经营责任杠杆的影响很明确:高等教育账面值为经营负债导致更高的杠杆一定水平的经营性资产。但是，对盈利能力的影响也很清楚从方程(12)来看:虽然保守经营性使资产增加了净资产收益率，就如弗尔

森和奥尔森(1995年)和张(2000年)，较高的账面价值的经营负债杠杆高达

RNOA超过净资产收益率。事实上，保守派占经营负债数额为杠杆书的回报率。通过利用方程(13)，即杠杆效应流经到股东盈利能力和回报。较高的预期回报意味着高价格与账面价值比。

预计的运营债务的潜在偏见对现在及长远利益有想法效应。例如一家企业账面有高的拖延的收入，增加的消费或者运营的债务都会增加运行债务的水平，而降低他现在的利益。现在的收入低一点，否则成本升高。如果报道降低了运营资产，增加了运营杠杆，也会降低现实利益:现在的花费必须高点。但是增长账目的应用会影响将来的运营收入。所有其他仍会不断，低现实收入意味着高将来收入。更重要的是，高的运营债务和低的运营资产意味着低的值比率的公平性。低的值比率是将来高收入的基础。所以运营债务潜在被认为是潜在倒转现象，能给影响杠杆，预示利益和账面价格的比例。

3 以实验为依据的分析

)公司被列举NYSE 或者这个分析基于1963到2001年，符合下列要求(1

AMEX(2)公司为非财政组织，在那里大部分资产和债务用作运营。(3)书面价值只是1千亿美元。运营资产的开始和结果的平衡平均水平，网式运营资产和普通的平衡是积极的。这项原则导致63527观察的样本。

附件B显示方差是怎样被应用在分析中的。一种值得讨论的测量观点是运营债务的借用消费。因为大部分运营债务是短期的，我们通过一年的利率风险溢价估算借用比率。这种方法可能低估借用消费因为与运营债务相关的风险并不小。这种测量误差效应会导致净资产收益率和经营负债杠杆的负相关。向我们展示的，这种负相关即使存在，也可以证明其正相关。

4 结论

资产运营，借贷，创作了杠杆。在运营中也借款，但是是从顾客，雇佣者和供应商借，创造了运营债务杠杆。因为他们包括在市场不同种类的交易，两种杠杆可能有不同的价值暗示。尤其是，运营资本可能缩水，因此价格不同。运营债务也包括增长的预算。这暗示了利益和平衡的杠杆。

对于运营债务杠杆，杠杆平衡包括真实的契约效应和账目效应。值比率依赖于与其利益，这个分析解释了值比率是受两类杠杆影响的。实际的分析证明了运营和债务预示了不同的利益在市场上价格也是不同的。

更多分析表明运营负债杠杆不仅能解释在盈利中的差别，还能够从当前的盈利情况预测到未来的盈利情况。运营债务杠杆作用和变化可以作为当今盈利和以后盈利的风向标。我们的分析将合同上的运营负债和预测的运营负债分开，但是进一步的研究可以在细节上，如更多的关注预支费用和递延收入方面更好的了解运营负债。进一步的研究也可以在不同的环境下调查运营负债，如公司在哪些地方的市场势力超过供应商。

附录B

Financial Statement Analysis of Leverage and How It Informs About Protability and

Price-to-Book Ratios DORON NISSIM, STEPHEN H. PENMAN

ABSTRACT

This paper presents a ,nancial statement analysis that distinguishes leverage that

arises in ,nancing activities from leverage that arises in operations. The analysis

yields two leveraging equations, one for borrowing to ,nance operations and one for borrowing in the course of operations. These leveraging equations describe how the two types of leverage affect book rates of return on equity. An empirical analysis shows that the ,nancial statement analysis explains cross-sectional differences in current and future rates of return as well as price-to-book ratios, which are based on expected rates of return on equity. The paper therefore concludes that balance sheet line items for operating

liabilities are priced differently than those dealing with ,nancing liabilities. Accordingly, ,nancial statement analysis that distinguishes the two types of liabilities informs on future pro,tability and aids in the evaluation of

appropriate price-to-book ratios. Keywords: financing leverage; operating liability leverage; rate of return on equity; price-to-book

ratio Leverage is traditionally viewed as arising from ,nancing activities: Firms borrow to raise cash for operations. This paper shows that, for the purposes of analyzing pro,tability and valuing ,rms, two types of leverage are relevant, one indeed arising from ,nancing activities but another from operating activities. The paper supplies a ,nancial statement analysis of the two

types of leverage that explains differences in shareholder

pro,tability and price-to-book ratios.

The standard measure of leverage is total liabilities to equity. However, while some liabilities—like bank loans and bonds issued—are due to ,nancing, other

like trade payables, deferred revenues, and pension liabilities—result from liabilities—

transactions with suppliers, customers and employees in conducting operations. Financing liabilities are typically traded in well-functioning capital markets where issuers are price takers. In contrast, ,rms are able to add value in operations because operations involve trading in input and output markets that are less perfect than capital markets. So, with equity valuation in mind, there are a priori reasons for viewing operating liabilities differently from liabilities that arise in ,nancing.

Our research asks whether a dollar of operating liabilities on the balance sheet is priced differently from a dollar of ,nancing

liabilities. As operating and ,nancing liabilities are components of the

book value of equity, the question is equivalent to asking whether

price-to-book ratios depend on the composition of book values. The

price-to-book ratio is determined by the expected rate of return on the book value so, if components of book value command different price premiums, they must imply different expected rates of return on book value. Accordingly, the paper also investigates whether the two types of liabilities are associated with differences in future book rates of return.

Standard ,nancial statement analysis distinguishes shareholder

pro,tability that arises from operations from that which arises from borrowing to ,nance operations. So, return on assets is distinguished from return on equity, with the difference attributed to leverage. However, in the standard analysis, operating liabilities are not distinguished from ,nancing liabilities. Therefore, to develop the speci,cations for the empirical analysis, the paper presents a ,nancial statement analysis that identi,es

the effects of operating and ,nancing liabilities on rates of return on book value—and

so on price-to-book ratios—with explicit leveraging equations that explain when

leverage from each type of liability is favorable or unfavorable.

The empirical results in the paper show that ,nancial statement analysis that distinguishes leverage in operations from leverage

in ,nancing also distinguishes differences in contemporaneous and future

pro,tability among ,rms. Leverage from operating liabilities typically levers pro,tability more than ,nancing leverage and has a higher frequency of favorable effects.Accordingly, for a given total leverage from both sources, ,rms with higher leverage from operations have higher price-to-book

ratios, on average. Additionally, distinction between contractual and estimated operating liabilities explains further differences

in ,rms’ pro,tability and their

price-to-book ratios.

Our results are of consequence to an analyst who wishes to forecast earnings and

and valuations derived from book rates of return to value ,rms. Those forecasts—

them—depend, we show, on the composition of liabilities.

The ,nancial statement analysis of the paper, supported by the empirical results, shows how to exploit information in the balance sheet for forecasting and

valuation.

The paper proceeds as follows. Section 1 outlines the ,nancial statements analysis that identi,es the two types of leverage and lays out expressions that tie leverage measures to pro,tability. Section 2 links leverage to equity value and price-to-book

ratios. The empirical analysis is in Section 3, with conclusions summarized in Section 4.

1 Financial Statement Analysis of Leverage

The following ,nancial statement analysis separates the effects

of ,nancing liabilities and operating liabilities on the pro,tability of shareholders’ equity. The

analysis yields explicit leveraging equations from which the

speci,cations for the empirical analysis are developed. Shareholder pro,tability, return on common equity, is measured as

Return on common equity (ROCE) = comprehensive net income ?common equity (1) Leverage affects both the numerator and denominator of this pro,tability measure. Appropriate ,nancial statement analysis disentangles the effects of leverage. The analysis below, which elaborates on parts of Nissim and Penman (2001), begins by identifying components of the balance sheet and income statement that involve operating and ,nancing activities. The pro,tability due to each activity is then calculated and two types of leverage are introduced to explain both operating and ,nancing pro,tability and overall shareholder

pro,tability.

1.1 Distinguishing the Protability of Operations from the

Protability of Financing Activities

With a focus on common equity (so that preferred equity is viewed as a ,nancial

liability), the balance sheet equation can be restated as follows: Common equity =operating assets，financial assets,operating liabilities,

Financial liabilities (2) The distinction here between

operating assets (like trade receivables, inventory and property, plant and equipment) and ,nancial assets (the deposits and marketable securities that absorb excess cash) is made in other contexts. However, on the liability side, ,nancing liabilities are also

distinguished here from operating liabilities. Rather than treating all liabilities as ,nancing debt, only liabilities that raise cash for operations—like bank loans,

short-term commercial paper and bonds—are classi,ed as such. Other liabilities—such as accounts payable, accrued expenses, deferred revenue,

restructuring liabilities and pension liabilities—arise from operations. The distinction

is not as simple as current versus long-term liabilities; pension liabilities, for example,

are usually long-term, and short-term borrowing is a current liability.

Rearranging terms in equation (2),

operating liabilities),(financial liabilities, Common equity = (operating assets,

financial assets) Or,

Common equity = net operating assets,net financing debt

(3) This equation regroups assets and liabilities into operating

and ,nancing activities. Net operating assets are operating assets less

operating liabilities. So a ,rm might invest in inventories, but to the extent to which the suppliers of those inventories grant credit, the net investment in inventories is reduced. Firms pay wages, but to the extent to which the payment of wages is deferred in pension liabilities, the net investment required to run the business is reduced. Net ,nancing debt is ,nancing debt (including preferred stock) minus ,nancial assets. So, a ,rm may issue bonds to raise cash for operations but may also buy bonds with excess cash from operations. Its net indebtedness is its net position in bonds. Indeed a ,rm may be a net creditor (with more ,nancial assets than ,nancial liabilities) rather than a net debtor.

The income statement can be reformulated to distinguish income that comes from operating and ,nancing activities:

Comprehensive net income = operating income, net financing expense

(4) Operating income is produced in operations and net ,nancial expense is incurred in the ,nancing of operations. Interest income

on ,nancial assets is netted against interest expense on ,nancial liabilities (including preferred dividends) in net ,nancial expense. If interest income is greater than interest expense, ,nancing activities produce net ,nancial income rather than net ,nancial expense. Both operating income and net ,nancial expense (or income) are after tax.3 Equations

(3) and (4) produce clean measures of after-tax operating

pro,tability and the

borrowing rate:

Return on net operating assets (RNOA) = operating income ?net operating assets (5) and

Net borrowing rate (NBR) = net financing expense ?net financing debt (6) RNOA recognizes that pro,tability must be based on the net assets invested in operations. So ,rms can increase their operating

pro,tability by convincing suppliers, in the course of business, to grant or extend credit terms; credit reduces the investment that shareholders would otherwise have to put in the business. Correspondingly, the net borrowing rate, by excluding non-interest bearing liabilities from the denominator, gives the appropriate borrowing rate for the ,nancing activities.

Note that RNOA differs from the more common return on assets (ROA), usually de,ned as income before after-tax interest expense to total assets. ROA does not

distinguish operating and ,nancing activities appropriately. Unlike ROA, RNOA excludes ,nancial assets in the denominator and subtracts operating liabilities. Nissim and Penman (2001) report a median ROA for NYSE and AMEX ,rms from

1963–1999 of only 6.8%, but a median RNOA of 10.0%—much closer to what one

would expect as a return to business operations.

1.2 Financial Leverage and its Effect on Shareholder Protability

From expressions (3) through (6), it is straightforward to demonstrate that ROCE is a weighted average of RNOA and the net borrowing rate, with weights derived from equation (3):

ROCE= [net operating assets ?common equity× RNOA],[net financing debt?

common equity ×net borrowing rate] (7)

Additional algebra leads to the following leveraging equation:

ROCE = RNOA，[FLEV× ( RNOA,net borrowing rate )] (8) where FLEV,

the measure of leverage from ,nancing activities, is

Financing leverage (FLEV) =net financing debt ?common equity (9) The FLEV measure excludes operating liabilities but includes (as a net against ,nancing debt) ,nancial assets. If ,nancial assets are greater than ,nancial liabilities, FLEV is negative. The leveraging equation (8) works for negative FLEV (in which case the net borrowing rate is the return on net ,nancial assets).

This analysis breaks shareholder pro,tability, ROCE, down into that which is due to operations and that which is due to ,nancing. Financial leverage levers the ROCE over RNOA, with the leverage effect determined by the amount of ,nancial leverage (FLEV) and the spread between RNOA and the borrowing rate. The spread can be positive (favorable) or negative (unfavorable).

1.3 Operating Liability Leverage and its Effect on Operating Protability

While ,nancing debt levers ROCE, operating liabilities lever the pro,tability of

operations, RNOA. RNOA is operating income relative to net operating assets, and net operating assets are

operating assets minus operating liabilities. So, the more operating liabilities a ,rm has relative to operating assets, the higher its RNOA, assuming no effect on operating income in the numerator. The intensity of the use of operating liabilities in the investment base is operating liability leverage:

Operating liability leverage (OLLEV) =operating liabilities ?net operating assets (10) Using operating liabilities to lever the rate of return from operations may not come for free, however; there may be a numerator effect on operating income. Suppliers provide what nominally may be interest-free credit, but presumably charge for that credit with higher prices for the goods and services supplied. This is the reason why operating liabilities are inextricably a part of operations rather than the

,nancing of operations. The amount that suppliers actually charge

for this credit is dif,cult to identify. But the market borrowing rate

is observable. The amount that suppliers would implicitly charge in prices for the credit at this borrowing rate can be estimated as a benchmark:

Market interest on operating liabilities= operating

liab ilities×market borrowing rate

世界贸易和国际贸易【外文翻译】

外文翻译 原文 World Trade and International Trade Material Source:https://www.wendangku.net/doc/139985117.html, Author: Ted Alax In today’s complex economic world, neither individuals nor nations are self-sufficient. Nations have utilized different economic resources; people have developed different skills. This is the foundation of world trade and economic activity. As a result of this trade and activity, international finance and banking have evolved. For example, the United States is a major consumer of coffee, yet it does not have the climate to grow any or its own. Consequently, the United States must import coffee from countries (such as Brazil, Colombia and Guatemala) that grow coffee efficiently. On the other hand, the United States has large industrial plants capable of producing a variety of goods, such as chemicals and airplanes, which can be sold to nations that need them. If nations traded item for item, such as one automobile for 10,000 bags of coffee, foreign trade would be extremely cumbersome and restrictive. So instead of batter, which is trade of goods without an exchange of money, the United State receives money in payment for what it sells. It pays for Brazilian coffee with dollars, which Brazil can then use to buy wool from Australia, which in turn can buy textiles Great Britain, which can then buy tobacco from the United State. Foreign trade, the exchange of goods between nations, takes place for many reasons. The first, as mentioned above is that no nation has all of the commodities that it needs. Raw materials are scattered around the world. Large deposits of copper are mined in Peru and Zaire, diamonds are mined in South Africa and petroleum is recovered in the Middle East. Countries that do not have these resources within their own boundaries must buy from countries that export them. Foreign trade also occurs because a country often does not have enough of a particular item to meet its needs. Although the United States is a major producer of sugar, it consumes more than it can produce internally and thus must import sugar.

基于哈佛分析框架的财务报表分析的文献综述

本科生毕业设计（论文）文献综述评价表

文献综述： 基于哈佛分析框架的财务报表分析的 文献综述 财务分析的重要性日益凸显，它不仅代表着企业的经营成果，还为企业以后的发展和管理提供决策依据。财务分析是通过一系列分析技术与方法，对企业的各种能力进行综合分析与评价，及时发现企业经营中出现的问题和不足，为企业的管理者管理和决策的信息。这是一个逻辑性很强的分析过程，需要从各种复杂的信息中把握分析逻辑，形成分析框架，才能获取有价值的信息。另一方面，财务分析对于投资者和股东的未来投资活动具有重要意义，它有助于利益相关者了解企业的经营现状和未来发展。本文对哈佛分析框架的国内外研究成果进行述评，为进一步的研究奠定基础。 1 国外关于财务分析方法的研究 伴随着西方资本市场的发展，其财务分析方法日益完善，财务分析体系快速发展。学者们开始建立财务分析框架，以更好地对企业的财务状况经行分析。少数学者提出从筹资活动、经营活动和投资活进行财务分析。而绝大部分学者则是在财务分析的基础上逐步引进战略分析、会计分析和前景分析三个维度。一部分学者是从三个维度来构建财务分析框架的。以Salmi（1997）为代表的学者提出从概论、会计分析和财务分析三个维度进行财务报表分析。而以Stickney（1999）为代表的学者则是从环境分析、会计分析和财务分析这三个维度展开。相比较而言，Stickney的尝试在原来两维度的基础上增加了环境分析，使得财务分析结果更为可靠。 还有一部分学者是从四个维度来构建财务分析框架的。最具有代表性的是哈佛大学佩普（K.G.Palepu）、希利（P.M.healy) 和伯纳德（V.L.Bemard)（2000）在《运用财务报表进行企业分析与评估》一书中提出了哈佛分析框架。其提出了一种集战略与财务报表分析为一体的、更具实际应用效果的财务分析框架，即哈佛分析框架。该框架由战略分析、会计分析、财务分析、前景分析共四个部分组成。哈佛分析框架的战略分析模块对企业所面临的外部环境进行了全面分析，不仅能发现企业发展中面临的机会和威胁，更能从战略高度为企业发展指出方向。哈佛分析框架做到了结合企业外部经济环境与企业个体特征、行业经济发展状况、生合周期和获利能力等因素对企业进行综合评判，对于投资者

某股份有限公司财务报表分析报告

摘要 正确组织和有效开展经济分析，对于企业正确制定经营方针，选择最佳方案，编制经营计划，合理评价企业经济活动，以及不断提高经济效益具有重要意义。经济分析具有判断性、情报性、预防性和建设性。企业是社会经济的细胞，股份制企业是社会经济细胞中较活跃的群体。 本文依据全面分析与重点分析相结合，经济分析与技术分析相结合，定性分析与定量分析相结合，利用核算数据与搞好调查研究相结合原则，对省哈飞汽车股份自2007 年至2009 年的财务状况从资本结构分析、偿债能力分析、营运能力分析、盈利能力分析、综合分析以及趋势分析等方面进行由外到地剖析和评价，对2009 年经营中存在的问题进行分析，最后提出建议。 关键词：财务报表分析；盈利能力；偿债能力

Abstract It is very important to organize and do economic analysis efficiently for an enterprise. The analysis plays key point in making business plan，evaluating the economic activities reasonably，and improving economic benefits. Economic analysis has the features of judging，information，predicting and constructing. The enterprises are the cell of social leconomy. The corporations，which are on the stock market，are the most active colony in them. In this report，by combination of whole analysis and emphasis analysis ，economic analysis and technical analysis，feature analysis and value analysis，and based on the rules of combination calculated data and research，the author tries to do an analysis and evaluation to Hafei Automobile Works Car company, the key enterprise of Heilongjiang Province. Based on the adjustment of financial statements，the analysis of capital structure，the analysis of assets operation efficiency，the analysis of profitability，the analysis of debt redemption and the synthetic analysis of the corporation from 2007 to 2009. The author also submits some suggestions to the problems in 2009 of the company. KeyWords：Financial Analysis; Profitability; Debt redemption

国际贸易、市场营销类课题外文翻译——市场定位策略(Positioning_in_Practice)

Positioning in Practice Strategic Role of Marketing For large firms that have two or more strategic business units (SBUs), there are generally three levels of strategy: corporate-level strategy, strategic-business-unit-level (or business-level) strategy, and marketing strategy. A corporate strategy provides direction on the company's mission, the kinds of businesses it should be in, and its growth policies. A business-level strategy addresses the way a strategic business unit will compete within its industry. Finally, a marketing strategy provides a plan for pursuing the company's objectives within a specific market segment. Note that the higher level of strategy provides both the objectives and guidelines for the lower level of strategy. At corporate level, management must coordinate the activities of multiple strategic business units. Thus the decisions about the organization's scope and appropriate resource deployments/allocation across its various divisions or businesses are the primary focus of corporate strategy.Attempts to develop and maintain distinctive competencies tend to focus on generating superior financial, capital, and human resources; designing effective organizational structures and processes; and seeking synergy among the firm's various businesses. At business-level strategy, managers focus on how the SBU will compete within its industry. A major issue addressed in business strategy is how to achieve and sustain a competitive advantage. Synergy for the unit is sought across product-markets and across functional department within the unit. The primary purpose of a marketing strategy is to effectively allocate and coordinate marketing resources and activities to accomplish the firm's objectives within a specific product-market. The decisions about the scope of a marketing strategy involve specifying the target market segment(s) to pursue and the breadth of the product line to offered. At this level of strategy, firms seek competitive advantage and synergy through a well-integrated program of marketing mix elements tailored to the needs and wants of customers in the target segment(s). Strategic Role of Positioning Based on the above discussion, it is clear that marketing strategy consists of two parts: target market strategy and marketing mix strategy. Target market strategy consists of three processes: market segmentation, targeting (or target market selection), and positioning. Marketing mix strategy refers to the process of creating a unique

零售企业营销策略中英文对照外文翻译文献

零售企业营销策略中英文对照外文翻译文献(文档含英文原文和中文翻译)

译文： 零售企业的营销策略 Philip Kotlor 今天的零售商为了招徕和挽留顾客，急欲寻找新的营销策略。过去，他们挽留顾客的方法是销售特别的或独特的花色品种，提供比竞争对手更多更好的服务提供商店信用卡是顾客能赊购商品。可是，现在这一切都已变得面目全非了。现在，诸如卡尔文·克连，依佐和李维等全国性品牌，不仅在大多数百货公司及其专营店可以看到，并且也可以在大型综合商场和折扣商店可以买到。全国性品牌的生产商为全力扩大销售量，它们将贴有品牌的商品到处销售。结果是零售商店的面貌越来越相似。 在服务项目上的分工差异在逐渐缩小。许多百货公司削减了服务项目，而许多折扣商店却增加了服务项目。顾客变成了精明的采购员，对价格更加敏感。他们看不出有什么道理要为相同的品牌付出更多的钱，特别是当服务的差别不大或微不足道时。由于银行信用卡越来越被所有的商家接受，他们觉得不必从每个商店赊购商品。 百货商店面对着日益增加的价格的折扣店和专业商店的竞争，准备东山再起。历史上居于市中心的许多商店在郊区购物中心开设分店，那里有宽敞的停车场，购买者来自人口增长较快并且有较高收入的地区。其他一些则对其商店形式进行改变，有些则试用邮购盒电话订货的方法。超级市场面对的是超级商店的竞争，它们开始扩大店面，经营大量的品种繁多的商品和提高设备等级，超级市场还增加了它们的促销预算，大量转向私人品牌，从而增加盈利。 现在，我们讨论零售商在目标市场、产品品种和采办、服务以及商店气氛、定价、促销和销售地点等方面的营销策略。 一、目标市场 零售商最重要的决策时确定目标市场。当确定目标市场并且勾勒出轮廓时，零售商才能对产品分配、商店装饰、广告词和广告媒体、价格水平等作出一致的决定。如沃尔玛的目标市场相当明确：

财务报表分析外文文献及翻译

财务报表分析外文文献及翻译 LNTU---Acc 附录A 财务报表分析的杠杆左右以及如何体现盈利性和值比率 摘要 关键词:财政杠杆;运营债务杠杆;股本回报率;值比率 传统观点认为，杠杆效应是从金融活动中产生的:公司通过借贷来增加运营的资金。 杠杆作用的衡量标准是负债总额与股东权益。然而，一些负债——如银行贷款和发行的债券，是由于资金筹措，其他一些负债——如贸易应付账款，预收收入和退休金负债，是由于在运营过程中与供应商的贸易，与顾客和雇佣者在结算过程中产生的负债。融资负债通常交易运作良好的资本市场其中的发行者是随行就市的商人。与此相反，在运营中公司能够实现高增值。因为业务涉及的是与资本市场相比，不太完善的贸易的输入和输出的市场。 因此，考虑到股票估值，运营负债和融资负债的区别的产生有一些先验的原因。我们研究在资产负债表上，运营负债中的一美元是否与融资中的一美元等值这个问题。因为运营负债和融资负债是股票价值的组成部分，这个问题就相当于问是否股价与账面价值比率是否取决于账面净值的组成。价格与账面比率是由预期回报率的账面价值决定的。所以，如果部分的账面价值要求不同的溢价，他们必须显示出不同的账面价值的预期回报率。因此， 标准的财务报表分析的能够区分股东从运营中和借贷的融资业务中产生的利润。因此，资产回报有别于股本回报率，这种差异是由于杠杆作用。然而，在标准的分析中，经营负债不区别于融资负债。因此，为了制定用于实证分析的规范，

我们的研究结果是用于愿意分析预期公司的收益和账面收益率。这些预测和估值依赖于负债的组成。 这篇文章结构如下。第一部分概述并指出了了能够判别两种杠杆作用类型，连接杠杆作用和盈利的财务报表分析第二节将杠杆作用，股票价值和价格与账面比率联系在一起。 第三节中进行实证分析，第四节进行了概述与结论。 1 杠杆作用的财务报表分析 以下财务报表分析将融资债务和运营债务对股东权益的影响区别开。这个分析从实证的详细分析中得出了精确的杠杆效应等式 普通股产权资本收益率=综合所得?普通股本 (1) 杠杆影响到这个盈利等式的分子和分母。适当的财务报表分析解析了杠杆作用的影响。以下分析是通过确定经营和融资活动中的资产负债表和损益表的组成开始分析。计算每一项活动所获得的利润，然后引入两种类型的杠杆作用来解释运营和融资的盈利以及股东的总体盈利。 1.1 区分运营和融资过程中的盈利 普通股权=经营资产，金融负债,经营负债,金融负债 (2) 侧重于普通股(以便优先股被视为融资债务)，资产负债表方程可重申如下:经营性资产的区别(如贸易应收款，库存和物业，厂房及设备)和金融资产(存款及可出售证券吸收多余现金)在其他方面。然而，债务方面，融资负债也区别于经营负债。不应该把所 有负债都当作融资负债来处理，相反，只有从运营中得到的现金，就像银行贷款，短期商业票据和债券属于这种类型。其他负债，如应付账款，累计费用，预收收入，重组债务和养老金负债，产生于业务。这种区别并不像当前与长远负债那么简单;养老金负债，例如，通常是长期，短期的借款是一种当前的负债。

市场营销价格策略外文翻译文献

市场营销价格策略外文翻译文献(文档含英文原文和中文翻译)

DESIGNING PRICING STRATEGIES All for-profit organizations and many nonprofit organizations set prices on their goods or services. Whether the price is called rent (for an apartment), tuition (for education), fare (for travel), or interest (for borrowed money), the concept is the same. Throughout most of history, prices were set by negotiation between buyers and sellers. Setting one price for all buyers arose with the development of large-scale retailing at the en d of the nineteenth century, when Woolworth’s and other stores followed a “strictly one-price policy” because they carried so many items and had so many employees. Now, 100 years later, technology is taking us back to an era of negotiated pricing. The Internet, corporate networks, and wireless setups are linking people, machines, and companies around the globe, connecting sellers and buyers as never before. Web sites like https://www.wendangku.net/doc/139985117.html, and https://www.wendangku.net/doc/139985117.html, allow buyers to compare products and prices quickly and easily. On-line auction sites like https://www.wendangku.net/doc/139985117.html, and https://www.wendangku.net/doc/139985117.html, make it easy for buyers and sellers to negotiate prices on thousands of items. At the same time, new tech- nologies are allowing sellers to collect detailed data about customers’ buying habits, preferences—even spending limits—so they can tailor their products and prices. 1 In the entire marketing mix, price is the one element that produces revenue; the others produce costs. Price is also one of the most ?exible elements: It can be changed quickly, unlike product features and channel commitments. Although price competi- tion is a major problem facing companies, many do not handle pricing well. The most common mistakes are these: Pricing is too cost-oriented; price is not revised often

跨境电商外文文献综述

跨境电商外文文献综述 (文档含英文原文和中文翻译) 译文: 本地化跨境电子商务的模型 摘要 通过对国际供应链的B2B电子商务交易量的快速增长和伊朗快速增加的跨境交易业务，跨境电商过程的有效管理对B2B电子商务系统十分重要。本文对局部模型的结构是基于B2B电子商务的基础设施三大层，消息层、业务流程层和内容层。由于伊朗的电子商务的要求，每一层的需要适当的标准和合适的方案的选择。当电子文件需要移动顺利向伊朗，建议文件的标准为文件内容支持纸质和电子文件阅读。验证提出的模型是通过案例研究方法呈现一到四阶段的情景。本文试图通过交换商业文件在贸易过程中这一局部模型，实现在全球电子贸易供应链更接近区域单一窗口建设的关键目标。 关键词：电子商务;跨境贸易;电子文档管理;国际供应链

1.简介 电子商务是关于在互联网或其他网络电子系统购买和销售产品或服务。术语B2B（企业对企业），描述了企业间的电子商务交易，如制造商和批发商，或批发商和零售商之间。本文的研究目标是上两个不同国家贸易商之间的通信。今天的世界贸易组织的主要目标之一是建立区域单一窗口，可以提高世界各地的贸易便利化。建立区域单一窗口需要跨境海关，可以有效地交换贸易文件。因此，首先，简化跨境贸易文件的关键在于朝着国家单一窗口移动。然后，区域单一窗口可以授权国家之间的通信。电子商务模型是基于三个主要逻辑层的研究。这三个层消息传输层，业务处理层和内容层。本文的局部模型是一种能够自动交换读取文件的过程。通过与东亚和中东国家的建立区域单一窗口可以在将来得到改善的更多的互操作性，从而建立伊朗国家单一窗口 在本文的第二部分讨论引进国际供应链中的跨境B2B模式所需的基本概念和标准。第三部分介绍在大的模型中引入的组件功能和范围。第四部分讨论了B2B交易层模型的定位，最后结束本文。 2.背景 在本节中，除了了解B2B电子商务在伊朗的情况，还有参考模型的背景等概念以及讨论B2B电子商务跨境模式的本土化。 2.1 B2B电子商务在伊朗 如今伊朗在贸易进程的变现是一个关键的贸易成功点。伊朗和许多其他国家接壤，它的进口和出口过程可以通过公路，铁路，海上和空中的方式来完成。因此，这个国家的中部和战略作用，使得它在亚洲和中东地区货物运输的主要贸易点。今天，在伊朗海关几乎所有的贸易过程通过纸质表格完成，由商务部提供的电子服务仅限于谁该国境内交易的商人。今天，伊朗海关几乎所有的贸易流程都是通过纸质表格来完成的，商务部给出的电子服务只限于该国的商人。介绍了模型试图简化在伊朗交易的跨境电子商务供应链交换电子文件的过程。这里提到的一些系统，由商务部在伊朗的电子服务被提及：进口订单管理系统。贸易统计制度。伊朗法典伊朗。这些电子系统的主要使用，以促进在伊朗贸易过程。这里提到的系统作为独立的贸易者可与建议本文模型在未来的作用。在亚洲的区域性单

微信营销外文翻译

正确地点和时间下新媒体伴随的社会营销Jay M. Bernhardt 佛罗里达大学健康教育与行为系，佛罗里达州Gainesville Darren Mays乔治敦大学医学中心肿瘤科，哥伦比亚特区华盛顿Amanda K. Hall佛罗里达大学健康教育与行为系，佛罗里达州Gainesville 摘要： 目的：本文的目的是寻求讨论新媒体革命以何种方式将“渠道”更贴近消费者从而提高社会营销。 研究思路：这篇论文描述当前有关的社交媒体和移动通信技术的新媒体发展趋势，并通过运用商业营销，社会变革和公众健康实例分析讨论其对社会营销产生的影响。 成果：快速增长的在线社交网络和世界大部分地区无处不在的手机为社会营销人员提供了巨大的潜力，以全新方式吸引消费者。这些新的通信平台的性质不同于传统媒体是可以使他们更有效地为市场营销服务，最明显的是更深层次消费者参与、多方位信息交流、和基于位置跟踪和消息传递的重要方式。 现实作用：本文所描述的趋势正在快速，从根本上改变商业营销人员、品牌经理和客户关系经理如何与当前的和潜在的消费者相处。社会营销活动应该从中学习，并利用这些新媒体更深入地联系大量的消费者，上述从业人员比以往任何时候都更接近“正确的地点和正确的时间”。 独创性/价值：本文探讨已经介绍了在爱尔兰都柏林的全球非营利和社会营销大会于2011年4月的一个话题。讨论应鼓励社会营销重新考虑“渠道”的作用，并探讨新媒体如何令地方更贴近消费者。 关键词：社会营销，新媒体，社交媒体，移动电话，4P理论，移动通信系统 市场营销组合（或4P理论）是旨在鼓励行为改变的社会营销计划规划和实施的中心结构(Grier and Bryant,2005)。尽管价格、产品和促销策略通常是社会营销活动的主要元素,达到期望的目标受众的地方卫生决策往往是一个挑战(GrierandKumanyika,2010)。地方经常困惑在营销组合那些寻求社会营销作为一个框架申请健康行为改变。常见的想法是,位置被定义为地理位置,然而,在社会营销不一定是一个人的业务所在处或其中一个产品的销售点,而是消费者的利益做出决定并采取行动(Storey et al., 2008)。 新的通信媒体能给社会营销个性化的机会,接触目标消费者在关键行为决策点。这些新媒体为社会营销人员提供多个移动渠道到达消费者在非常情况下做出决定,通过创建直接,双向沟通渠道。这些双向交流现在可以发生在实时决策是在何时何地。第一次社会营销人员可以利用这些新渠道接触数以千计甚至数以百万计的人们在相对较低的成本促进健康的生活方式和影响社会变革(Thackeray et al., 2008)。 传统上,社会营销努力促进健康行为改变很大程度上依赖于地方定义为物理位置来分发产品(KreuterandBernhardt,2009)。他们在公共厕所上放置安全套自动售货机推广安全性行为或将营养标志放置在杂货店以期说服客户选择更健康的食品(Storey et al., 2008)。这些例子需要大量投资时间和物质资源从而成功地到达消费者。此外,确定一个是否会购买和使用避孕套或者被营养信息标志广告影响的合适的目标客户是一个具有挑战性的判断过程。相比之下,新媒体可

财务报表分析研究外文翻译

本科毕业设计（论文） 外文翻译 题目双汇企业财务报表分析研究 姓名宋孟姣 专业 2010级财务管理本科1班 学号 201040016 指导教师董玥玥 郑州科技学院工商管理学院 二〇一四年三月

FINANCIAL STA TEMENT ANALYSIS OF EVERAGE AND HOW IT INFORMS ABOUT PORABLIITY AND PRICE-TO-BOOK RA TIOS 1 FINANCIAL STATEMENT ANALYSIS OF EVERAGE The following inimical statement analysis separates the effects of enhancing liabilities and operating liabilities on the portability o f shareholders’ equity. The analysis yields explicit leveraging equations from which the speci?cations for the empirical analysis are developed. Shareholder portability, return on common equity, is measured as Return on common equity (ROCE) = comprehensive net income ÷common equity (1) Appropriate inimical statement analysis disentangles the effects of leverage. The analysis below, which elaborates on parts of Nazism and Penman (2001), begins by identifying components of the balance sheet and income statement that involve operating and enhancing activities. The portability due to each activity is then calculated and two types of leverage are introduced to explain both operating and enhancing portability and overall shareholder portability. 1.1 Distinguishing the Portability of Operations from the Portability of Financing Activities Common equity =operating assets＋financial assets－operating liabilities－Financial liabilities （2）The distinction here between operating assets (like trade receivables, inventory and property, plant and equipment) and inimical assets (the deposits and marketable securities that absorb excess cash) is made in other contexts. However, on the liability side, enhancing liabilities are also distinguished here from operating liabilities. Rather than treating all liabilities as enhancing debt, only liabilities that raise cash for operations—like bank loans, short-term commercial paper and bonds—are classier as such. Other liabilities—such as accounts payable, accrued expenses, deferred revenue, restructuring liabilities and pension liabilities—arise from operations. The distinction is not as simple as current versus long-term

中色股份公司财务报表分析

一、中色股份有限公司概况 中国有色金属建设股份有限公司（英文缩写NFC，简称：中色股份）1983年经国务院批准成立，主要从事国际工程承包和有色金属矿产资源开发。目前，中色股份旗下控股多个公司，涉及矿业、冶炼、稀土、能源电力等领域；同时，通过入股民生人寿等稳健的实业投资，增强企业的抗风险能力，实现稳定发展。 二、资产负债比较分析 资产负债增减变动趋势表 （一）增减变动分析 从上表可以清楚看到，中色股份有限公司的资产规模是呈逐年上升趋势的。从负债率及股东权益的变化可以看出虽然所有者权益的绝对数额每年都在增长，但是其增长幅度明显 该公司07年的速动比率为0.89，08年为0.81，09年为0.86，相对来说，没有大的波动，只是略呈下降趋势。每1元的流动负债只有0.86元的资产作保障，是绝对不够的，这表明该企业的短期偿债能力较弱。 （3）现金比率 该公司07年的现金比率为0.35，08年为0.33，09年为0.38，从这些数据可以看出，该公司的现金即付能力较强，并且呈逐年上升趋势的，但是相对数还是较低，说明了一元的流动负债有0.38元的现金资产作为偿还保障，其短期偿债能力还是可以的。 （三）资本结构分析 （1）资产负债率 该企业的资产负债率07年为58.92%，08年为61.14%?09年为59.42%。从这些数据可

以看出，该企业的资产负债率呈现逐年上升趋势的，但是是稳中有降的，说明该企业开始调节自身的资本结构，以降低负债带来的企业风险，资产负债率越高，说明企业的长期偿债能力就越弱，债权人的保证程度就越弱。该企业的长期偿债能力虽然不强，但是该企业的风险系数却较低，对债权人的保证程度较高。 （2）产权比率 该企业的产权比率07年为138.46%，08年为157.37%，09年为146.39%。从这些数据可以看出，该企业的产权比率呈现逐年上升趋势的，但是稳中有降的，从该比率可以看出，该企业对负债的依赖度还是比较高的，相应企业的风险也较高。该企业的长期偿债能力还是较低的。不过，该企业已经意识到企业的风险不能过大，一旦过大将带来重大经营风险，所以，该企业试图从高风险、高回报的财务结构向较为保守的财务结构过渡，逐渐增大所有者权益比例。 。 逐年下降趋势的。尤其是08年下降幅度最大，充分看出金融危机对该公司的影响很大。之所以下降，是因为该公司近三年的主营业务收入都在下降，虽然主营业务成本也在同时下降，但是下降的幅度没有收入下降的幅度大，这说明企业的全部资产经营效率降低，偿债能力也就有所下降了。总体来看，该企业的主营收入是呈现负增长状态的。 （2）流动资产周转率 该企业的总资产周转率07年为1.64，08年为1.18，09年为1.02。从这些数据可以看出，该企业的流动资产周转率是呈现逐年下降趋势的。尤其也是08年下降幅度最大，说明08年的金融危机对该公司的影响很大。总的来说，企业流动资产周转率越快，周转次数越多，周转天数越少，表明企业以占用相同流动资产获得的销售收入越多，说明企业的流动资产使用效率越好。以上数据看出，该企业比较注重盘活资产，较好的控制资产运用率。

中国的对外贸易外文翻译及原文

外文翻译 原文 Foreign T rade o f China Material Source:W anfang Database Author:Hitomi Iizaka 1.Introduction On December11,2001,China officially joined the World T rade Organization(WTO)and be c a me its143rd member.China’s presence in the worl d economy will continue to grow and deepen.The foreign trade sector plays an important andmultifaceted role in China’s economic development.At the same time, China’s expanded role in the world economy is beneficial t o all its trading partners. Regions that trade with China benefit from cheaper and mor e varieties of imported consumer goods,raw materials and intermediate products.China is also a large and growing export market.While the entry of any major trading nation in the global trading system can create a process of adjustment,the o u t c o me is fundamentally a win-win situation.In this p aper we would like t o provide a survey of the various institutions,laws and characteristics of China’s trade.Among some of the findings, we can highlight thefollowing: ?In2001,total trade to gross domestic pr oduct(GDP)ratio in China is44% ?In2001,47%of Chinese trade is processed trade1 ?In2001,51%of Chinese trade is conduct ed by foreign firms in China2 ?In2001,36%of Chinese exports originate from Gu an gdon g province ?In2001,39%of China’s exports go through Hong Kong to be re-exported elsewhere 2.Evolution of China’s Trade Regime Equally remarkable are the changes in the commodity composition of China’s exports and imports.Table2a shows China’s annu al export volumes of primary goods and manufactured goods over time.In1980,primary goods accounted for 50.3%of China’s exports and manufactured goods accounted for49.7%.Although the share of primary good declines slightly during the first half of1980’s,it remains at50.6%in1985.Since then,exports of manufactured goods have grown at a much