【最新文档】引言范文word版本 (9页)
本文部分内容来自网络整理，本司不为其真实性负责，如有异议或侵权请及时联系，本司将立即删除！
== 本文为word格式，下载后可方便编辑和修改！ ==
引言范文
篇一：范文经典前言
前言
书籍，是人类文明和智慧的结晶，是知识的宝库，是广大少年儿童的良师益友，也是孩子们人生道路上的引路人。读书对学习的促进作用是大家都了解的。教
师们对如何提高读书效率的讨论也很多。多读、精读、带着问题读、分角色朗读，有感情的读等等，都是想用外在的形式促使学生在读书时能有所收获。课
堂教学是学生主要的学习渠道，而课外阅读则可以充实和扩大课堂学习的内容。搞好学生的课外阅读，培养他们良好的读书习惯，对于学生加深课堂教学内容
的理解，开拓视野，提高兴趣，培养自学能力等都会起到很好的作用。
在新课改背景下开展读书活动，是提高教育教学质量的有效途径，也是进一步
推进校园文化建设，促进学生个性发展的需要。通过真实的读书活动让每一位
学生与书为伴，养成好读书的习惯，保鲜我校读经典书特色。我校读经典书从
两个方面开展，一是体现大阅读，将课内与课外阅读相结合；二是激发学生背
诵唐诗三百首。
我校的领导到教师都能积极地培养学生的自主学习即生本教学。在校长的指导下，每个班都建起了班级书吧。学生自主读书学习的积极性很高，下课时，同
学们争先恐后地到书吧前借书看，每天到校第一件事就是看自己喜欢的书和背
古诗，放假回家了也要卖几本书带着回去看。孩子的读书也影响了家长，家长
在百忙中与孩子一起读书，形成了小手拉大手的读书氛围。以下图片就是我一
年级组在近期评选出的优秀亲子阅读和背诗小能手。
篇二：三、引言写法范文
三、引言写法范文
引言的写法
引言部分对于引起读者的兴趣至关重要，应写得引人入胜，最主要的一点是让
人读后能明白你的论文写什么，让人觉得你的日的明确。引言没有固定的程式，主要取决于论文的对象、论题和写作的方法。下面是几种最基本的方法。
1) 引语 (Quotation)
“Two cheers to democracy” was E.M. Foster's not-quite-wholehearted judgement. Most Americans would not agree. To them, our democracy is one of the glories of civilization. To one American, E.B.White, in particular, democracy is "the hole in the stuffed shirt through which the sawdust slowly tricks ... the dent in the high hat ... the recurrent suspicion that more than half of the people are right more than half of the time". (915) American democracy is based on the oldest continuously operating written constitution in the world – a most impressive fact and a testament to the farsightedness of the founding fathers. But just how farsighted can mere humans be? In Future Shock, Alvin Toffler quotes economist Kenneth Boulding on the incredible acceleration of social change in our time: "The world of today ... is as different from the world in which I was born as that world was from Julius Caesar's."(13) As we move toward the twenty-
first century, it seems legitimate to question the continued effectiveness of a governmental system that was devised in the eighteenth century, and it seems equally legitimate to consider alternative.
以两句引语展开讨论，这两句精妙而带煽动性的评论颇能激发读者的兴趣。接着又引用Boulding的话，有助于引向论文的中心。
2）回顾历史（Historical review）
有时，读者在不了解相关的历史背景的情况下不能立即抓住你探讨的问题。请看下面这段开头的写法：
Sex and violence on the screen are not new issues. In the Roaring Twenties there was increasing pressure from civic and religious groups to ban depictions of “immorality” from the screen. Faced with the threat of federal censorship, the film producers decided to clean their own house. In 1930, the Mo
tion Picture and Distributors of America established the Production Code. At first, adherence to the Code was voluntary; but in 1934 Joseph Breen, newly appointed head of the MPPDA, gave the Code teeth. Henceforth all newly produced films had to be submitted for approval to the Production Code Administration, which had the power to award or withhold the Code seal. Without a Code seal, it was virtually impossible for a film to be shown anywhere in the United States, since exhibitors would not accept it. At about the same time, the Catholic Legion of Decency was formed to advise the faithful which films were and were not objectionable. For several decades the Production Code Administration exercised powerful control over what was portrayed in American theatrical films. By the 1960s, however,
changing standards of morality had considerably weakened the Code's grip. In 1968, the Production Code was replaced with a rating system designed to keep younger audiences away from films with high levels
of sex or violence. Despite its imperfections, this rating system has proved more beneficial to American films than did the old censorship system.
这篇论文在引言之后，紧接着谈收视率等级法（rating system）的好处。作者觉得提供等级法的某些历史背景，有助于读者理解他的论述。请注意提供背景
应按时间顺序。
3）回顾论争（Review of controversy）
回顾过去的争论或论争，是历史性回顾的一种特殊形式。请看下面一段引言的
写法：
The American Heritage Dictionary's definition of civil disobedience
is rather
simple: “the refusal to obey civil laws that are regarded as unjust, usually by employing methods of passive resistance.” However,
despite such famous (and beloved) examples of civil disobedience as the movements of Mahatma Gandhi in India and the Reverend Martin Luther King, Jr. in the United States, the question of whether or not civil disobedience should be considered an asset to society is hardly clear cut. For instance, Hannah Aren't, in her article "Civil Disobedience", holds that "to think of disobedient minorities as rebels and truants is against the letter and spirit of a constitution whose framers were especially sensitive to the dangers of unbridled majority rule." On the other hand, a noted lawyer, Lewis Van Dusen, Jr., in his article "Civil Disobedience: Destroyer of Democracy ", states that “civil disobedience, whatever the ethical
rationalization, is still an assault on our democratic society, an affront to our legal order and an attack on our constitutional government." These opposite views are clearly incompatible. I believe, though, that Van Dusen's is the more convincing. On balance, civil disobedience is dangerous to society.
这篇文章的题目是写“非暴力反抗”的消极面，而不是Dusen那样持完全反对
意见的文章。但在引入这个论题时，作者提供了反面的意见，同时简要地提到
两个参与论证的人及其观点。文章从一开始就针对这个论题的具体方面，而不
是抽象的方面，作者这样做是希望让读者一起来关注这一争论，而非暴力反抗
的争论正是这篇文章的论题。
4）从一般到具体（From the general to the specific）