了不起的盖茨比英文影评书评Money Love and Aspiration in The Great Gatsby

Money, Love, and Aspiration in The Great Gatsby

by Roger Lewis

One characteristic of popular American fiction is the implicit separation of love and money. Possession of one does not lead to possession of the other. If the protagonists of Horatio Alger?s books become rich and win the girl, such winning is an adjunct to their sudden solvency, not a consequence of it. Alger wants his audience to believe, perhaps, that common sense and moral determination secure the love of a worthy partner; but that these qualities of common sense and moral determination are the property of those who must struggle for money is an assumption -not an issue Alger wants to explore. As a result, it is impossible to imagine what happens to Ragged Dick, Frank Fowler, or any of the hundreds of Horatio Alger heroes after their first success.

The separation of love and money characterizes serious American fiction too. The guilt that seems to lurk behind the source of Lambert Strether?s wealth (the firm in Woollett “made something”) unde rscores both his and, I suspect, his creator?s distaste for tainting the finer emotions with anything so crass as commercialism. If the independence and energy that constitute Strether?s as well as his earlier prototype?s, Christopher Newman?s, most appeal ing facets come from contact with the struggles of business, the novel prefers to treat this matter as background. The inamoratas of Strether and Newman are fascinating more for their richness of background and their exquisiteness of taste than for the fortune that sustains these qualities.

What I have said so far seems to me to hold especially true for American fiction before World War I. The laissez-faire democratic ideal that America has always believed it believed is the product of an age when individual effort counted, when a man could rise by his own efforts, and when—if his affairs were not succeeding—hecould at least escape by signing up for a whaling voyage or lighting out for the territory ahead of the rest. When the system failed, it was the fault of rapscallions and crooks; the vision itself remained an ideal and the standard from which criticisms and judgments could be made.

World War I shattered this vision. It ended once and for all the faith in individual effort that had been eroding since the Industrial Revolution and had persisted—sometimes naively and sometimes defensively—in the fiction that I have been mentioning. As Mark Schorer has pointed out, disillusionment with the American system and the efficacy of individual effort is the distinguishing characteristic of postwar American writing.

Of course, not many, if any, ideals die totally and suddenly even after mortal blows, and during periods of transition the most complex and seminal works are often written. In this respect the 1920s bridge the gap between the older, simpler, more naive and idealistic America and the bewildering, disparate, rootless, cynical America of the present. The Great Gatsby, neatly published in the mid-1920s, is a key work, looking Janus-like in both directions.

The opening words of the novel express this double vision.

In my younger and more vulnerable years my father gave me some

advice that I?ve been turning over in my mind ever since.

“Whenever you feel like criticising any one,” he told me, “just

remember that al l the people in this world haven?t had the advantages

that you?ve had.” (p. 1)

The narrator, Nick Carraway, senses that he is too quick to condemn; his father has a perspective from which to make judgments. Nick has to remind himself of his father?s more b alanced, human appraisal. The younger Carraway has one foot in the past and one in the present; his allegiance to his father?s older, more careful manner is maintained at the cost of constant surveillance.

When, in a following paragraph, Nick declares that after returning from the East he “wanted the world to be in uniform and at a sort of moral attention forever” (p. 2), he connects the war with his cynical, guilty disapproval of the New York the book is about to portray, but he goes on to make an exception for Gatsby, allying Gatsby to an older, more humane America—an ironic identification, since Gatsby “represented everything for which I have unaffected scorn” (p. 2). Thus, not only the narrator but also Gatsby is double, making the novel doubly double.

Such doubleness is important, because by it Fitzgerald creates a character whose naivete can be simultaneously touching and absurd, and who can possess the most romantic and crass attitudes at the same time. By the end of the novel, Gatsby and what he stands for reach proportions of mythic profundity.

Expressing such resonances was a talent Fitzgerald had to develop. Some indication of his abilities is present in This Side of Paradise, and some of the rhythms of The Great Gatsby appear in embryonic form in t he earlier book, but it is not until “Winter Dreams” in 1923 that Fitzgerald explicitly connects the themes of love and money. In this story, Dexter Green, a figure straight from the work ethic of Horatio Alger, loses Judy Jones, a child of wealth. Yet the relationship between love and money in “Winter Dreams” is not as simple as in Alger. For one thing, Judy Jones, the heroine of the story, is a romantically attractive woman. In Horatio Alger?s fiction, rich females are cold and cruel and loveless, but Judy Jones is exciting and desirable, capable of exciting love in others, but, once society has corrupted her, not herself capable of loving. Exciting others and promising love, however, matter more than the realizable dreams of wealth necessary to obtain Judy Jones; they give the story all its powerful emotion. The intangibility of the emotion, its transience and fragility, its evanescent illusory quality, and the fact that it is unrealizable account for its enchantment. What sustains the charm is the atmosphere that surrounds Judy Jones, an atmosphere engendered by wealth. This wealth destroys even as it creates; thus, the doubleness of Gatsby is prefigured here.

When Dexter Green is aware of how empty and bereft his life is because the dream of the old Judy Jones has gone, he has the impulse to “get very drunk.” There are shades here of Amory Blaine, who similarly responds when Rosalind is not to be his. But not, seemingly, shades of Gatsby; although a bootlegger, Gatsby is abstemious and careful—a man aware of his own doubleness. Both dreamer and vulgarian at the same time, he is, like DexterGreen, a money maker and a romantic; unlike Dexter Green, he seems to balance between the two. He appears able to keep the halves in control.

Almost predictably, the obje ct of Gatsby?s romantic quest, Daisy Buchanan, comes to us in a double way. She is, of course, presented not by Gatsby or Fitzgerald but by Nick Carraway, and she comes to us through his filter of contradictory impressions and emotions. After Nick?s description of Tom, with the latter?s conceit and meanness, the reader is prepared to respond instantly to the charm of Daisy. Daisy comes to us laughing “an absurd, charming little laugh” (p. 10) that makes Nick laugh also. The pleasing impression of Daisy is largely vocal:

… there was an excitement in her voice that men who had cared for her

found difficult to forget: a singing compulsion, a whispered “Listen,” a

promise that she had done gay, exciting things just a while since and

that there were gay, exciting things hovering in the next hour. (p. 11)

But then Nick?s doubleness reasserts itself. Just as we are seduced by her simpering mockery of her husband, captivated by her posturing, her “thrilling scorn” (p. 21), and the romantic glow with which Fitzgerald has surrounded her, Nick pulls us back.

The instant her voice broke off, ceasing to compel my attention, my

belief, I felt the basic insincerity of what she had said. It made me

uneasy, as though the whole evening had been a trick of some sort to

exact a contributory emotion from me. I waited, and sure enough, in a

moment she looked at me with an absolute smirk on her lovely face, as

if she had asserted her membership in a rather distinguished secret

society to which she and Tom belonged. (pp. 21-2)

This identification with Tom comes as a surprise. So does its limited extension to Nick himself. (A few pages earlier, Nick has referred to the fact that he and Tom “were in the same senior society” [p. 9] at Yale.) The three-way identification of Tom, Nick, and Daisy momentarily demystifies Daisy and consequently makes the reader trust more in Nick?s judgments. Nick can both glamorize Daisy so that the reader shares Gatsby?s attraction to her and undercut Daisy so that the reader can see her from without. Such a set of contradictions strengthens the spell Daisy can cast and givesus a view of Daisy that contrasts to the one Gatsby will later present. The double view of Daisy persists throughout the novel, although it is later replaced by the more compelling topic o f Gatsby?s feeling for her; it certainly continues through Chapter 5, when Gatsby meets Daisy again after five years. At this point, our contradictory feelings are transferred to their relationship. Fitzgerald deliberately recalls our reactions by a reference to the first scene with Daisy when Nick refers to a joke about the butler?s nose. His description of Daisy?s voice when Gatsby enters Nick?s house, also recalls that previous episode:

For half a minute there wasn?t a sound. Then from the living-room I

heard a sort of choking murmur and part of a laugh, followed by

Daisy?s voice on a clear artificial note:

“I certainly am awfully glad to see you again.” (p. 104)

Just when it seems as though the hollow, mannered, deliberate falseness is going to continue, Fitzgerald effects another peripeteia. When Nick returns after having left Daisy and Gatsby alone for awhile, Daisy is crying, and “every vestige of embarrassment” (p.

107) has disappeared. Daisy?s throat, at this point, “full of aching, grieving beauty, told only of her unexpected joy” (p. 108). Love seems possible, especially for Gatsby. He dominates the rest of the chapter, as “a new well-being radiated from him” (p. 108).

It is no accident that this scene falls squarely in the middle of the novel. It might also be the emotional center of it, and it is noteworthy that in a letter to his editor, Maxwell Perkins, Fitzgerald mentioned this scene as his favorite.

Yet, moving as it may be, the initial encounter of Gatsby and Daisy cannot really be the emotional center of The Great Gatsby. For one thing, however much we may be charmed by Daisy, Nick?s previous depiction of her undercuts our ability to give unquestioning credence to her feelings on this occasion. And, more comically, the means by which Gatsby expresses his feelings for Daisy—even though those feelings are sincere—is by showing off his possessions. Urging Daisy and Nick to explore his house, he tells them: “…It took me just three years to earn the money that bought it?” (p. 109). The very language in which Nick describes Gatsby?s love for Daisy is commercial: “I think he revalued everything in his houseaccording to the measure of response it drew from her well-loved eyes.” (p. 111). Daisy responds to Gatsby?s display: she cries over his beautiful shirts.

Even when the sentiments are genuine, they are formulated in monetary terms. Gatsby?s love for Daisy is an intense and worked-out variety of that which lovers of all ages have felt; its expression is distinctively that of postwar America, of a society that consumes.

At this point in The Great Gatsby the relationship between love and money has been suggested but not enlarged, as it will be later. For one thing, we do not know about Gatsby?s impoverished beginnings, and our ignorance is essential to Fi tzgerald?s plan. It is not simply the case, as Edith Wharton suggested in a letter to Fitzgerald, that Fitzgerald wishes to tell his story in a new fashion just to be “modern”; nor can I wholly accept Fitzgerald?s explanation that the reason for withholdin g Gatsby?s past is to augment the sense of mystery surrounding him, although doing so does have such an effect. Rather, withholding exactly who Gatsby is or where he comes from is a method of underscoring the rootlessness of postwar American society, its restless alienation, and its consequent reliance on money as a code for expressing emotions and identity.

Fitzgerald seems at every point to emphasize the unconnected-ness of Gatsby. Gatsby has shifting identities according to which party guest one listens to, but most of the identities, even the one that turns out to be “true,” have something of the unreal or fantastic about them. When they do not, they seem fantastic by being juxtaposed with others that do.

“Who is he?” I demanded. “Do you know?”

“He?s just a man named Gatsby.”

“Where is he from, I mean? And what does he do?”

“Now you’re started on the subject,” she answered with a wan smile.

“Well, he told me once he was an Oxford man.”

A dim background started to take shape behind him, but at her next

remark it faded away.

“However, I don?t believe it.” (p. 59)

This rootlessness begins when the war ends. Before he identifies himself, the war is the subject of Gatsby?s conversation with Nick,and it is the most grounded identity, until the novel?s denouement, that Gatsby has.

How do the members of such a rootless, mobile, indifferent society acquire a sense of who they are? Most of them don?t. The novel presents large numbers of them as comic, disembodied names of guests at dinner parties: the Chromes, the Backhyssons, and the Dennickers. Some, of course, have some measure of fame, but even Jordan Baker?s reputation does not do much for her other than get her entree to more parties. A very few, such as Gatsby, stand out by their wealth; his hospitality secures him a hold on many peoples? memories, but Fitzgerald is quick to point up the emptiness of this: Klipspringer cares more about his lost tennis shoes than Gatsby?s death.

In this connection, Fitzgerald?s insistence on Gatsby as a man who “sprang from his own Platonic conception of himself” is important. Conceiving one?s self would seem to be a final expression of rootlessness. And it has other consequences for love, money, and aspirations as well. When one?s sense of self is self-created, when one is presen t at one?s own creation, so to speak, one is in a paradoxical position. One knows everything about oneself that can be known, and yet the significance of such knowledge is unclear, for no outside contexts exist to create meaning. The result is that a

self-created man turns to the past, for he can know that. It is an inescapable context. For Gatsby and for the novel, the past is crucial. His sense of the past as something that he not only knows but also thinks he can control sets Gatsby apart from Nick and gives him mythical, larger-than-life dimensions. When he tells Nick that “of course the past can be repeated” (p. 133) or that Tom?s love for Daisy was “…just personal?” (p. 182), he may be compensating for his inability to recapture Daisy; but he must believe these things because the postwar world in which he, Gatsby, lives is meaningless and almost wholly loveless.

A glance at the relationships in The Great Gatsby proves this latter point. Daisy and Tom?s marriage has gone dead; they must cover their dissatisfactions with the distractions of the idle rich, Myrtle and Tom are using one another; Myrtle hates George, who is toodull to understand her; the McKees exist in frivolous and empty triviality. Even Nick seems unsure about his feelings for the tennis girl back in the Midwest. His attraction to Jordan Baker is clearly an extension of this earlier relationship (both girls are associated with sports), but occurring as it does in the East, it partakes of the East?s corruption. It too calls forth the need for money.?In a draft manuscript of The Great Gatsby, Nick makes the link between money and desire explicit: “I thought that I loved her and I wanted money with a sudden physical pang.” Later Nick compares his loveless affair with Jordan to refuse the sea might sweep away, a feeling that Jordan senses and throws back at Nick with cruel irony when she accuses him of being dishonest—leading her on with no intention of marrying her—after lying to him that she is engaged to another man. In brief, the world of The Great Gatsby can seem as sordid, loveless, commercial, and dead as the ash heaps presided over by the eyes of Dr. T. J. Eckleburg. Indeed, this atmosphere is so essential to The Great Gatsby that one of the alternative titles Fitzgerald considered for the novel was Among the Ash-Heaps and Millionaires.

Against this backdrop, the Gatsby-Daisy relationship seems to shine. It is at least a shared connection in which both partners respond with equal intensity. For Gatsby it has endured: He has loved Daisy for five years. And if their love is founded upon feelings from the past, these give it, notwithstanding Gatsby?s insistence on being able to repeat the past, an inviolability. It exists in the world of money and corruption but is not of it.

Some implications of the inviolability Gatsby does not see. His very protesting, however, shows his sense of the impossibility of returning and makes at once more poignant and more desperate his effort to win Daisy—a poignancy further increased by the futility of his money in achieving this end.

“I?m going to fix everything just the way it was before,” he said,

nodding determinedly. “She?ll see.”

He talked a lot about the past, and I gathered that he wanted to recover

something, some idea of himself perhaps, that had gone into loving

Daisy. His life had been confused and disordered since then, but if he

could once return to a certain starting place and go over it all slowly,

he could find out what that thing was… (p. 133).

The last orderly period of Gatsby?s life, then, was t he period before he was sent to fight in the war, when he was still in the process of self-creation. The period when he loved Daisy and when Daisy loved him preceded his period of fabulous wealth. In this respect, he fits the Alger stereotype.

The period when his love becomes most intense, however, is precisely that in which he does not see Daisy. The love born in this period is therefore largely a function of his imagination. The kernel of his experience remains untouched because it is safely embedded in a previous time; the growth of the love is wild and luxuriant. It spurs him on, resulting in the glamorous world of parties and in the “huge incoherent failure” (p. 217) of his house.

The romantic and fantastic nature of Gatsby?s love seems extraordinary and absurd, looked at in worldy, practical terms. Why does he wait so long to arrange a meeting and then use Jordan Baker and Nick Carraway to bring it about? A man with Gatsby?s resources would surely have a hundred easier ways to do what he does in the course of this story. The answer is that the love becomes more important than the object of it. Gatsby has already started down this path in Louisville when he asks himself, “…What would be the use of doing great things if I could have a better time telling h er what I was going to do??” (p. 180).

If Gatsby himself is presented as curiously “unreal,” the connection between Daisy and Gatsby—the unobtainable and the insubstantial—is destined to founder in a world as insistently material as the one Fitzgerald details for us. In such a world, Gatsby cannot make love to Daisy. Even earlier, during the war, when Gatsby and Daisy did make love (“took” her [p. 178]), physical

contact was a limitation of his love: “He knew that when he kissed this girl, and forever wed his unutterable visions to her perishable breath, his mind would never romp again like the mind of God” (p. 134). And the moments of greatest intimacy between them are those when they neither speak nor make love: “They had never been closer in their month of love, nor communicated more profoundly one with another, than when she brushed silent lips against his coat?s shoulder or when he touched the end of her fingers, gently, as though she were asleep” (p. 180). No wonder, then, that after the five-year hiatus, when Gatsby?s love has had the chance tofeed upon itself and nourish itself, the possibility of physical intimacy has not grown, but the love has grown beyond the merely “personal.”

For these reasons Chapter 7, where Daisy, Tom, Gatsby, Nick and Jordan engage a suite at the Plaza hotel, is of greatest importance. If Daisy?s love for Gatsby is to endure, it must exist in non-Platonic, physical terms. It must exist in the world of money. The scene in New York demonstrates the impossibility of this transformation and further connects Gatsby?s love to his sense of fabulous, mythical riches.

If Gatsby dominates the first meeting with Daisy—the chapter ends at his house, on his territory—Tom dominates the denouement at the hotel. The change of venue allies Chapter 7 to Chapter 2, the scene of Tom?s violent party with Myrtle Wilson, a connection Fitzgerald underscores by the telephone conversation about Tom Buchanan?s selling his car and by the stopping for gasoline at George Wilson?s station.

Daisy sees purposelessness as characterizing her whole life: “…What?ll we do with ourselves this afternoon?? cried Daisy, ?and the day after that, and the next thirty years??” (p. 141). The idleness of this remark doesn?t threaten Gatsby?s grandiose feelings, but Daisy inhabits the physical world of Tom, and she wants to act, not just dream, so it is she who proposes that the party move to New York—to Tom?s territory. Such a move takes the day away from Gatsby. Daisy?s voice ominously molds the “senselessness [of the heat] in to forms” (p. 142)—i.e., abstract feelings into concrete deeds. It is before the five characters move to New York that (Gatsby makes his famous remark to Nick: “…Her voice is full of money?” (p. 144). This insight, which Fitzgerald added when the novel was in galley proof, shows Gatsby?s understanding of the link between love and money. Daisy?s voice has been described as the seductive, thrilling aspect of her. What Gatsby, with surprising consciousness,

states is that Daisy?s charm is allied to the attract ion of wealth; money and love hold similar attractions.

It is true that from Wolfsheim to Nick Carraway, people are in the East to earn their livings, to pursue “the shining secrets thatonly Midas and Morgan and Maecenas knew” (p. 5). But Gatsby, with his boundless capacity for love, a capacity unique in the sterile world he inhabits, sees that the pursuit of money is a substitute for love. He knows himself well enough to see that his own attraction toward wealth is tied to his love for Daisy. The fact that Gatsby?s money, like his love, should be self-made gives his description of her voice authority and depth.

That Daisy?s voice should be full of money is a remark only Gatsby could make.? It is a statement of someone alive to the possibilities of love and money and sensitive to them—perhaps too much so. Tom could never have provided the description of Daisy. His attraction to Daisy has nothing to do with her wealth. (Her family is well off, but apparently not very rich—certainly not compared to the Buchanan fortune.) And it is impossible to imagine Tom making Gatsby?s remark because Tom is accustomed to having money. Money qua money holds no interest for him because it does not have to be chased after: His is old money simply there to be used. Tom may buy anything he wishes—from polo ponies to cufflinks—but he understands that polo ponies or cufflinks are all he is buying. His money was divested of dreams before he was even born.

Gatsby?s, on the other hand, is new money, money in the process of being acquired. This newness gives the money some purpose and vitality; what Gatsby buys he buys for a purpose: to win Daisy. But there is a danger for Gatsby in this redeeming purposefulness. When he buys his fantastic house, he thinks he is buying a dream, not simply purchasing property. This direction makes Gatsby a more sympathetic man than Tom, but it is a sympathy he projects at the price of naivete; he is completely innocent of the limits of what money can do, a man who, we feel, would believe every word of an ad vertisement] Daisy even makes this identification: “…You resemble the advertisement of the man?” (p. 142).

In this respect Gatsby embodies the acquisitive, consuming spirit of the rest of the characters in the novel. The characters of The Great Gatsby are pursuing a world of misunderstood elegance, mirrored in a thousand romantic and comic details and apotheosized, perhaps, in Nick?s description of New York as made of “whiteheaps and sugar lumps all built with a wish out of non-olfactory money” (p. 82).

“No n-olfactory” is a curious word. It is Fitzgerald?s way of using the common locution that “money smells.” He is also reminding us, of course, that Gatsby?s money does not “smell” right—however explicitly or tacitly condoned by the denizens of Gatsby?s world, illegal and shifty means (bootlegging, stolen securities) have been used to make that wealth. Gatsby does not see that the corruption at the base of his fortune in effect compromises his vision of life with Daisy. You cannot win the ideal with the corrupt, and you cannot buy integrity or taste with dollars. When late in the story Daisy attends one of Gatsby?s parties, she is repelled rather than attracted. So stated, this has a moralistic ring, but no reader of The Great Gatsby could ever mistake it for a didactic work. The reader is at many points encouraged to marvel at the glitter, especially as it is the means by which Gatsby chases after Daisy. If such morality as the book conveys comes through most explicitly in the attitudes of its narrator, there are nevertheless many moments when Nick is simply overwhelmed by the astonishing freshness and strength of Gatsby?s feeling. Indeed, after the remark about Daisy?s voice, Nick finds himself participating in Gatsby?s thinking. He finds this moment similar to an earlier one in Chapter 5 when he “was going to ask to see the rubies” (p. 113). He continues Gatsby?s dream for us, recognizing the strength of Gatsby?s identification of Daisy?s voice and money.

That was it. I?d never understood it before. It was full of money -that

was the inexhaustible charm that rose and fell in it, the jingle of it, the

cymbals? song of it. … High in a white palace the king?s daughter, the

golden girl. … (p. 144)

Here not only Nick but also we share Gatsby?s dream. The man who has asked Daisy, “…Can?t you talk about crops or something??” (p. 15) breaks into reverie. We share in the pleasures, in the fantasies; Nick?s and Gatsby?s vision becomes ours. And thus the book fosters our appreciation of Gatsby?s corrupt dream. Yet such part icipation can never be wholehearted and can never be complete: Nick breaks off as Tom returns with a bottle of whiskey, and the scene becomes Tom?s again.

The novel?s insistence that Tom win the struggle over Daisy is tantamount to denying the realization of the kind of love that Gatsby is offering Daisy and that the novel values above all others. What does remain is the marriage of Tom and Daisy. Ironically, such love as even that relationship may contain is embedded in the past (“that day I carried you do wn from the Punch Bowl?” [p. 159]). The future, uncertain and without love, is a kind of death -rendering the world

of The Great Gatsby grim indeed. Nick sees the oncoming years as harrowing and lonely ones. What does life hold for a decent man like Nick? He has no love, unlike Gatsby. Nick is thirty, a number that recalls Daisy?s frightening question, “…What?ll we do with ourselves … for the next thirty years??” (p. 144)

One answer to Nick?s self-doubts might be his liaison with Jordan Baker. That, however, has already been presented to us as a troubled one. If Jordan is “too wise ever to carry well-forgotten dreams from age to age” (p. 163), she is wrapped in almost impenetrable narcissism; after the disturbing events of the day when Myrtle has been killed, Jordan is ready for a date: “…It?s only half-past nine?” (p. 171). But Nick, having watched Gatsby?s love for Daisy effectively terminated, having seen Myrtle violently run down, and wrapped in his own loneliness, cannot accede to compulsive and indeed perverse socializing.

The novel?s sense of duality, of attraction and repellence, diminishes after the hotel scene. Instead the book proceeds with deliberate mechanicalness to work out the consequences of Daisy?s having run down Myrtle. Wilson?s dull, self-defensive grief is the embodiment of the sterility of the valley of ashes; lacking a dream, his life itself is a kind of death. Wilson may have been married in a church “…a long time ago,?” (p. 189), but his present God is the disembodied eyes of Dr. T. J. Eckleburg, an advertisement. For him love has vanished, and he is left without a vision to sustain him. The man who kills Gatsby is already dead when he commits the murder; Nick Carraway describes him as “ashen” (p. 194), and his suicide is simply a belat ed acknowledgment of his condition.

Wilson and Gatsby both die by Wilson?s hand, suggesting an identification. There is one. Both have aspired to marry above their social station. Whereas Wilson borrows a suit for his wedding toconceal his low economic sta tus, Gatsby wears his country?s uniform while courting Daisy. But there the similarity ends. Yet it is worth noting that Gatsby has tried to do what probably no other developed male character in a major work of American fiction has tried to do. He has tried to marry for love into a class higher than the one he comes from. Usually women make such an attempt, namely, Sister Carrie, Lily Bart, and a host of others.

In this respect the difference between Gatsby and the hero of another book published in the same year, Theodore Dreiser?s An American Tragedy, is instructive. Clyde Griffiths, like Gatsby, tries to rise from humble beginnings in the Midwest to a larger, more glamorous life in the East. Like Gatsby, Clyde attaches himself to a woman (Sondra

Finchley) from a moneyed family. And both believe that if they only have enough money, they can buy the dream they seek.

There is a crucial difference. Clyde Griffiths is sexually attracted to Sondra Finchley, but he is not in love with her. Sondra provides the weal th and glamor that Clyde?s lover Roberta, is unable to, but Clyde?s feelings for Sondra are really subordinate to his sense of pleasure in her leisured environment. Of Gatsby?s depth of feeling, of Gatsby?s imagination, of Gatsby?s genuineness of sentiment(“…I can?t describe to you how surprised I was to find out I loved her, old sport?” [p. 179]), Clyde Griffiths knows nothing.

He is unaware of the fact, but Clyde is using Sondra for his own ends. Jay Gatsby is not using Daisy. He strives to move in higher circles because Daisy is there. Of course, in doing so, he violates a cultural norm. He tries to buy into a tradition instead of accepting one. Social convention and time triumph. The wearing away of freedom and the impossibility of realizing the only dreams that make life worth living are the themes of The Great Gatsby. The absence of great love is more painful because the sense of possibility money provides is so powerfully ambient in Gatsby?s world.

Again, because the dream is unrealizable, the past becomes increasingly important to the book, for it is in memories that the dream can live. The final pages of the novel are pervaded by the consciousness of the past and the sense of history (“the dark fields of the republic” [p. 218]). For most readers thes e pages are themost moving and suggestive in the book, and, many would add, in the whole of F. Scott Fitzgerald?s writing. The reason is that what has been felt or implied in every line earlier in the novel is expanded there in paragraphs of increasingly greater suggestiveness until the passage achieves archetypical resonances—resonances beyond even the usual national, historical ones claimed for this section of the novel.

That these final paragraphs should echo through the whole book can be illustrated bib liographically. Nick?s meditation about American history and the sense of possibility originally appeared in the manuscript not as the conclusion to the whole novel, but as the end of Chapter 1, where Nick returns to West Egg from visiting Tom and Daisy an d sees Gatsby attempting to “determine what share was his of our local heavens” (p. 26). All the images from the final pages—the moon rising higher, the “inessential houses” (p. 217), the “fresh, green breast of the new world” (p. 217), and so on are here, and the passage?s haunting, lost feeling comes through because of them. Nick?s accidental sighting of Gatsby at this point is not

sufficient reason for the depth or length of the meditation, and Fitzgerald brilliantly repositioned the passage to where it now stands—but the feeling of loss was already present early in the conception. If in reading the book we find the final paragraphs a fitting conclusion, then that is so as a result of the novel?s originally having hung from them, or having been composed with them already written.

From the start, therefore, Fitzgerald sensed the possibility of writing a novel whose theme embraced the notion of dreams in a general way. In letters written around the period of The Great Gatsby,Fitzgerald refers to the novel?s being about those illusions that matter so much that you chase after them, because even though they are illusions, nothing matters as much as they do. What counts is nothing less than the profoundest experience of love. Yet what is Gatsby?s love for Daisy but illusion, one fed by the dream of fulfillment America offered?

And as the moon rose higher the inessential houses began to melt away

until gradually I became aware of the old island here that flowered

once for Dutch sailors? eyes—a fresh, green breast of the new world.

Its vanished trees, the trees that had made way forGatsby?s house, had

once pandered in whispers to the last and greatest of all human dreams;

for a transitory enchanted moment man must have held his breath in

the presence of this continent, compelled into an aesthetic

contemplation he neither understood nor desired, face to face for the

last time in history with something commensurate to his capacity for

wonder. (pp. 217-18)

The love that imbues this passage, the warmth and closeness of the tone, is expressed in the imagery of birth, from the womblike feeling of holding breath, from the breast of the new world, and from the lack of understanding or desire: All these are feelings connected with being born. And because every man, including the reader, is the “last” man in history while he is alive, these sentences achieve the immediacy of myth and archetype.

The love that Gatsby has for Daisy is one whose sexual component is hidden in the inviolate past. It sees the affairs of the world as necessary but sordid. It is the love Fitzgerald felt for America, as Alfred Kazin has noted in An American Procession. In such enclosed dreams we are children; they offer us a kind of ultimate innocence. But because such love is unconsummated and unconsummatable, it cannot express itself directly. Instead it imbues that which surrounds it with its own special quality.

This quality spills into Nick?s sense of history and into the novel?s feelings of what it means to be wealthy. Unsophisticated writers such as Horatio Alger made a false separation between love and money; more complex writers sublimated or subordinated the one to the other. The unique contribution of The Great Gatsby is the identification of them. The acquisition of money and love are both part of the same dream, the will to return to the quintessential unity that exists only at birth and at death.

The last sentence of the novel, “So we beat on, boats against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past,” points out that all of our great dreams are grounded in impossibility: We progress toward that which we want, but the natural movement of life is retrograde—we die. The water here, as in The Waste Land,is both life-giving amnion and a destroying force.

To say this as Fitzgerald has is to reach an insight of final proportion. For this reason, The Great Gatsby transcends the ideas of the 1920s, its ostensible subject. By yoking the harsher, cynical post-war judgments about love and human endeavor to the older dreams of the past, the novel makes a synthesis greater than any single period could have achieved. The Great Gatsby is about love and money, but its greater subject—the tragic nature of aspiration—links these two in ways that deepen in the broadest, profoundest way our sense of who we are.

Roger Lewis, who has published a novel and a volume of poetry, directs a small publishing company in Washington, D.C. He is an Associate Professor of English at George Mason University.

《了不起的盖茨比》读后感1000字

《了不起的盖茨比》读后感1000字 这城市太空洞，这都市太冷漠，这人世太虚假，这人心太复杂，这感情太脆弱，这爱情太虚无，这人性太险恶，这人类太可憎，这现实太残忍，这结局太可悲。 作为《了不起的盖茨比》这个故事的叙述者，尼克对盖茨比有着很特殊的情感，有着非同寻常的深刻印象。尼克曾经这样描述盖茨比的微笑，他说：“一瞬间这种微笑面对着—或者似乎面对着整个永恒的世界，然而一瞬间，它凝聚到你身上，对你表现出一种不可抗拒的偏爱。”以此来看，盖茨比是一个喜欢微笑的人是一个乐观的人，是一个温柔的人。不过事实也的确如此，盖茨比的为人确实很和善，很亲和，很容易让人亲近，很容易叫人产生好感。 读了这本书之后，我觉得盖茨比是一个极其矛盾的人，是一个让人想不通、看不透的人，是一个叫人又爱又恨的人，是一个叫人恨铁不成钢的人，是一个让人既同情又怜惜的人。对于爱情，盖茨比太过执著，太过沉迷；对于感情，盖茨比非常用心，极其费心；对于黛西，盖茨比付出真心，给予浪漫；对于爱人，盖茨比太过真情，太多执念；对于生活，盖茨比太多设想，太过幻想；与人相交，盖茨比的确真心真意，确实纯洁和善；对于朋友，盖茨比非常真诚，极其认真；对于财富，盖茨比拼命追求却不屑享乐。 对于黛西这个女人，我心中有很多不满，很多责备，很多怨言，很多不理解。与此同时，我又觉得她很可怜，很可悲，毕竟在那个乱世来看，她也不过是一个为情所困，为生活所困的可怜人罢了。 黛西既风情又美丽，既娇憨又可爱，既狭隘又善妒，既可怜又可恨，既有一点真诚又极其善于做作，既喜欢寻找刺激又屈服于命运。黛西是一个追求物质，喜欢权贵的人，她为了荣华贪恋上了富贵，为了财富攀附上了富豪，为了豪门放弃了真爱，为了自我伤害了他人，为了脱罪，牺牲了盖茨比。她的这种阴险狠毒，这种蛇蝎心肠，这种懦弱胆小，这种无情无义，这种寡情薄意，着实叫人生气，让人愤怒。 黛西的故意靠近，故意撩拨，故意卖弄，故意隐瞒，故意伤害，让盖茨比深陷其中不可自拔，更是让盖茨比失去了真心，葬送了生命。盖茨比死了，为了所谓的真爱，他就那样无辜的死了，可是悲哀的是，他到死都不知道黛西的真面目，他不知道黛西一直以来都在欺骗他的感情，玩弄他的真心，嘲笑他的痴情，讥讽他的善心，他更不知道，就算他死了，黛西也不在乎他的牺牲，不屑于他的死亡，不在意他的付出，不感谢他的真情，不承认他的感情。 盖茨比的人生是一个悲剧，他的爱情更是一个笑话，可是造成他这种结局的，除了可恶的黛西，除了可悲的盖茨比本身，还在于那个动乱的年代，那个残酷的年代，那个浮躁的年代，那个腐败的年代。我希望，有更多的人可以从这部书中受到一些启发，得到一些教训，我更期望，这个世界可以多一些善心，多一些真心，多一些真实，多一些真情。

《了不起的盖茨比》英文读后感

Pursuit for dreams —after reading The Great Gatsby I have heard of the famous novel The Great Gatsby for many years. However, until recently have I got the time and mood to read it. As soon as I finish reading, I find my previous unwarranted assumption of it totally wrong. This is a story about Gatsby and his pursuit for the ‘American dreams'. During the World War One, the poor soldier Gatsby fell in love with an upper class girl named Daisy. But due to the wide gap between them, Daisy decided to marry Tom, a man of her class, instead of Gatsby. Broken-hearted Gatsby then held the conviction that money was of the greatest importance. He strongly believed in the ‘American dreams', which as we all know, advocates that one can achieve whatever he or she likes through continuous efforts. He strived for five years to become a millionaire and bought a villa near Daisy's to attract her. He was too addicted to his fantasy to realize that Daisy was no longer the lovely girl she used to be. Eventually, he was killed because of her crime. After reading it, something reverberates in my heart. I

了不起的盖茨比观后感(精选多篇)

了不起的盖茨比观后感(精选多篇) 第一篇：了不起的盖茨比观后感第二篇：《了不起的盖茨比》观后感第三篇：了不起的盖茨比观后感第四篇：《了不起的盖茨比》观后感第五篇：电影《了不起的盖茨比》观后感更多相关范文电影《了不起的盖茨比》观后感 前一口气看完了两部由“万人迷”迪卡普里奥主演的两部电影———《了不起的盖茨比》和《被解救的姜戈》。两部电影虽然讲述了两个完全不同的故事，但是由于都有迪卡普里奥的参演而使人有将其拿来一起回味的冲动。《了不起的盖茨比》改编自菲茨杰拉德的著名同名小说，而被解救的姜戈则是由鬼才导演曾经执导过《电影无耻》和《低俗小说》的昆汀·塔伦蒂诺苦心孤诣的佳作。而我们的杰克在这两部今年叫好又叫座的电影中都有不俗的表现。但是作为影迷，我们在关注明星精湛演技的同时更应该认真思考电影所想要体现出的 导演的思想。在此我想就电影《了不起的盖茨比》与大家分享几点自己的感受。 电影《了不起的盖茨比》讲述了一个发生在20世纪20年代的美国的故事。电影通过主角之一的尼克叙述展开，讲述了主人公盖茨比因为战事离开自己的恋人黛西，在数年之后战争结束之际回到自己的家乡时却发现自己曾经的恋人已经改嫁他人，而此时的盖茨比已经成为一位亿万富翁。为了挽回那段曾经让自己(请帮助宣传：)刻骨铭心的爱情，无比痛心的他在黛西家河对岸的自己的家中夜夜笙歌，举办豪华奢侈的派对，希望以此引起黛西的注意。然而盖茨比美好的愿望

却在一开始就注定已经是一场悲剧。在那个物欲横流的社会，再美好的爱情也抵挡不住金钱和地位的诱惑。数年的等待已经 * 改变了黛西以及她与盖茨比之间曾经看起来坚贞不渝的爱情。影片最后黛西无情地离开了一直深爱着她的盖茨比。看到最后我们不禁为盖茨比对爱情的坚贞不渝 而感动，同时也对黛西的无情和势利感到心痛。我们不禁要问：难道爱情真的会败给现实和时间吗？其实回过头来想想盖茨比美好的幻想其实从一开始就注定会是一场梦而已。爱情固然伟大美好并且值得我们为此坚守一生，可是现实往往是残酷的，任何事情都抵挡不住时间的消磨和名利的诱惑。纵使曾经和自己深爱并且许下海誓山盟的誓言的爱人。黛西最后连盖茨比的葬礼也没来参加，就说明爱情在现实面前有时会是多么的不堪一击。盖茨比的故事以一场悲剧结束，我想原著作者菲茨杰拉德更想要表现的是在那个充满物质欲望和不 安定社会氛围中的一种对社会崇尚奢侈之风的不满以及对于物质欲 望泯灭人性的思考。 20世纪初期美国经济迅速发展，处于盛极一时的柯立芝时代，迅速发展的经济造就了一批类似于盖茨比和汤姆一样的富豪。但是与此同时社会贫富差距日益扩大，追求金钱利益似乎成了每个人共同的愿望，男人追求财富和美女，女人热衷于地位和金钱。黛西最终在盖茨比回到她身边之前嫁给了富商汤姆，这体现了她对于名利的渴望。试想如果她果真是个对爱情坚贞不渝的人的话，那为何在盖茨比数年后再次回到她身旁时她却失去了想和盖茨比度过余生的勇气。这种结果

写作指导：如何写英文影评及练习含答案

如何用英语介绍一部电影 【写作任务】 假定你是李华，你校英文爱好者协会准备在电影周期间展播一部英文电影。请你根据提示，给该协会负责人Ted写一封信，向他推荐美国电影《马戏之王》（The Greatest Showman）。 注意：1. 词数100左右（开头和结尾已给出，但不计入总词数）； 2. 可适当增加细节，以使行文连贯。 Dear Ted, I’m writing to recommend The Greatest Showman to you for our school Film Week. _____________________________________________________________________ _________________ I am looking forward to your consideration of this film. Yours, Li Hua 【写作指导】 一、审题定调 介绍一部电影时，我们常用夹叙夹议的方式，即用记叙的方式介绍电影的剧情，用议论的方式发表自己的看法。介绍电影情节时要抓住重点，电影评论部分要客观公正。 在介绍电影情节时，多用一般现在时和一般过去时，人称多用第三人称。二、谋篇布局

因为该信件的开头和结尾部分已给出，所以我们只需要写出正文部分即可。正文可分为三部分： 第一部分：电影简介(上映日期、类型、导演等)； 第二部分：剧情简介； 第三部分：发表评论。 三、组织语言 第一部分：电影简介（上映日期、类型、导演等）。 第二部分：剧情简介。 第三部分：发表评论。 【范文展示】 普通范文

the_great_gatsby(了不起的盖茨比)_英文介绍及赏析

The Great Gatsby F.Scott.Fitzgerald . Character List Daisy Buchanan - Nick’s cousin, and the woman Gatsby loves. As a young woman in Louisville before the war, Daisy was courted by a number of officers, including Gatsby. She fell in love with Gatsby and promised to wait for him. However, Daisy harbors a deep need to be loved, and when a wealthy, powerful young man named Tom Buchanan asked her to marry him, Daisy decided not to wait for Gatsby after all. Now a beautiful socialite, Daisy lives with Tom across from Gatsby in the fashionable East Egg district of Long Island. She is sardonic and somewhat cynical, and behaves superficially to mask her pain at her husband’s constant infidelity. Daisy Buchanan (In-Depth Analysis) Tom Buchanan - Daisy’s immensely wealthy husband, once a member of Nick’s social club at Yale. Powerfully built and hailing from a socially solid old family, Tom is an arrogant, hypocritical bully. His social attitudes are laced with racism and sexism, and he never even considers trying to live up to the moral standard he demands from those around him. He has no moral qualms about his own extramarital affair with Myrtle, but when he begins to suspect Daisy and Gatsby of having an affair, he becomes outraged and forces a confrontation. Jordan Baker - Daisy’s friend, a woman with whom Nick becomes romantically involved during the course of the novel. A competitive golfer, Jordan represents one of the “new women” of the 1920s—cynical, boyish, and self-centered. Jordan is beautiful, but also dishonest: she cheated in order to win her first golf tournament and continually bends the truth. Myrtle Wilson - Tom’s lover, whose lifeless husband George owns a run-down garage in the valley of ashes. Myrtle herself possesses a fierce vitality and desperately looks for a way to improve her situation. Unfortunately for her, she chooses Tom, who treats her as a mere object of his desire. Analysis of Major Characters Daisy Buchanan Partially based on Fitzgerald’s wife, Zelda, Daisy is a beautiful young woman from Louisville, Kentucky. She is Nick’s cousin and the object of Gatsby’s love. As a young debutante in Louisville, Daisy was extremely popular among the military officers stationed near her home, including Jay Gatsby. Gatsby lied about his background to Daisy, claiming to be from a wealthy family in order to convince her that he was worthy of her. Eventually, Gatsby won Daisy’s heart, and they made love before Gatsby left to fight in the war. Daisy promised to wait for Gatsby, but in 1919 she chose instead to marry Tom Buchanan, a young man from a solid, aristocratic family who could promise her a wealthy lifestyle and who had the support of her parents. After 1919, Gatsby dedicated himself to winning Daisy back, making her the single goal of all of his dreams and the main motivation behind his acquisition of immense wealth through criminal activity. To Gatsby, Daisy represents the paragon of perfection—she has the aura of charm, wealth, sophistication, grace, and aristocracy that he longed for as a child in North Dakota and that first attracted him to her. In reality, however, Daisy falls far short of Gatsby’s ideals. She is beautiful and charming, but also fickle, shallow, bored, and sardonic. Nick characterizes her as a careless person who smashes things up and then retreats behind her money. Daisy proves her real nature when she chooses Tom over Gatsby in Chapter VII, then allows Gatsby to take the blame for killing Myrtle Wilson even though she herself was driving

《了不起的盖茨比》英文读后感

Why is Gatsby great? After finishing this novel, this question keep me puzzled for a long time. Is this an irony? As a result of deep thinking and analyzing others' reviews, I finally came to a conclusion, that it isn't a irony. Gatsby is dramatically great. First, he is a man of ambition and diligence. He was born poor materially but not mentally ,longing for a broader world outside. Accidentally he met Dan Cody, a wealthy captain who bring him to the upper class, changing his life. Gatsby was not Gat was called James Gatz originally, but he changed his name in order to suit his status. When he was young, he fell in love with a beautiful debutante, Daisy, when the first world war broke out abruptly. Gatsby reluctantly joined the army, expecting to marry her as soon as the war ended. To his depression, he couldn’t return to America for some particular reason, and five years passed, Daisy married a rich football player, which convinced Gatsby that it was the desire of money captivated Daisy’s pure soul, so he exerted himself to make money, though by some shady business. In consequence of his diligence, he became a famous millionaire that everyone knew in West Egg. It was an typical American story: a poor man managed to be rich Second, he is a man of romantic dream and honest love. He built a luxurious mansion across the bay of Daisy’ house, holding extravagant parties every night, merely because maybe someday she would come. After several twists and turns, he got the opportunity to met her again. He was so into her that as a middle-aged man he couldn’t calm himself. He decorated the room with fresh flowers like garden, just as a teenage boy who is to date with his crushed girl for the first time. When the doorbell rang, he went out and ran in the pouring rain in order to hold back his excitement. There wouldn’t be a more honest man in the world, let alone in the materialistic society where unction was learnt by everyone and honesty was seen as foolishness. His love was the purest in the world and no one would have the honor to accept it. Even though it struck him that Daisy no longer loved him, what she loved was merely his money and the stimulation caused by affairs. After Daisy killed a woman by car accident, he chose to take the responsibility, in order that she would lead an easier life. Last but not the least, he is a man who can find devout hope in impasse and keep it on in the firm belief. He was convinced that it was himself who was the man Daisy ever loved from the beginning to the end, and that she merely married her husband for money. Even after she told him literally that she once love both of them but she only love Gatsby at that moment, he couldn’t accept it.‘Daisy will call’, he just believed for no reason. He moved the telephone around the swimming pool, for fear that he might miss her call. He believed that everyone was as kind as he. He believed in the diming green light. At the same time, “the great Gatsby” is also an irony. The narrator Nick Carraway who hardly ever commented on anybody else said that Gatsby were worth the whole damn bunch put together. The people around Gatsby, including Tom

世界是平的 英文影评

Review of “Outsourced” “Outsourced”is a typical fish-out-of-water tale about a young American telemarketer who learns that his job is being shipped overseas. Todd Anderson (Josh Hamilton) spends his days managing a customer call center in Seattle until his job, along with those of the entire office, are outsourced to India. Todd rejects but when his boss informs him that quitting would mean losing his stock options, he has to go to train his Indian replacement Puro (Asif Basra). Out of constant cultural misunderstandings, Todd (Josh Hamilton) is frustrated with everything in India. He eats food by using left hand which is taboo in India. Left hand is considered as dirty hand, which is used for clean something. That’s why Todd (Josh Hamilton) can’t find toilet paper in washroom. It is quite different from America. Also Todd (Josh Hamilton) sees the personal questions, which asked by the hostess, as an embarrassing invasion of his privacy. She questions Todd during his classes, tells him he needs to know more about India. Because of cultural diversity, Todd (Josh Hamilton) has difficulty making the call center employees understand what their American customers expect. In order to get the length of a call down to six minutes, Todd (Josh Hamilton) teaches the Indian employees to speak in American way. While an employee Asha (Ayesha Dharker) questions Todd (Josh Hamilton) during his classes, tells him he needs to know more about India. She becomes his

了不起的盖茨比经典句子中英文

菲茨杰拉德的《了不起的盖茨比》，摘录书中比较经典的句子： Chapter 1 1. 每当你觉得想要批评什么人的时候，你切要记着，这个世界上的人并非都具备你禀有的条件。 Whenever you feel like criticizing any one, just rember that all the people in this world haven ' thad the advantages that you 've had. 2. 人们的善恶感一生下来就有差异。 A sense of the fundamental decencies is parceled out unequally at birth. 3. 人们的品行有的好像建筑在坚硬的岩石上，有的好像建筑在泥沼里，不过超过一定的限度，我就不在乎它建在什么之上了。 Conduct may be founded on the hard rock or the wet marshes, but after a certain point I don ' tcare what it ' s founded on. Chapter 2 这时，天色已经暗了下来，我们这排高高地俯瞰着城市的灯火通明的窗户，一定让街头偶尔抬头眺望的人感到了，人类的秘密也有其一份在这里吧，我也是这样的一个过路人，举头望着诧异着。我既在事内又在事外，几杯永无枯竭的五彩纷呈的生活所吸引，同时又被其排斥着。 Yet high over the city our line of yellow windows must have contributed their share of humansecrecytothecasualwatcherinthedarkeningstreets,andIwashimtoo,lookingupan dwondering.Iwaswithinandwithout,simultaneouslyenchantedandrepelledbytheinexh austible variety of life. Chapter 3 1. 他理解体谅地笑了——这笑比理解和体谅有更多的含义。这是那种不多见的使你忐忑不安的情绪能很快地平静下来的笑，这种笑容人的一生中顶多能碰 上四五次。它先是再一刹那间面对——或者说似乎在面对——整个外部世界，然后他就全副心神地倾注到你的身上，对你充满一种不可抵御的偏爱之情。它对你的理解恰是

《了不起的盖茨比》读后感400字

《了不起的盖茨比》读后感400字 导语：《了不起的盖茨比》问世，奠定了弗·司各特·菲茨杰拉德在现代美国文学史上的地位，成了20年代“爵士时代”的发言人和“迷惘的一代”的代表作家之一。20世纪末，美国学术界权威在百年英语文学长河中选出一百部最优秀的小说，《了不起的盖茨比》高居第二位，傲然跻身当代经典行列。下面是由橙子为大家整理的几篇关于这本书的读后感希望你们能喜欢！ 【第一篇】 去年的暑假，趁着闲暇之余我捧起了这本在影响美国人一生的文学名著中排名第二的小说。《了不起的盖茨比》是一本在上文学上怀有“美国梦”的作家菲茨杰拉德的作品，菲茨杰拉德认为他自己与众不同，与他的父母也不同，甚至不认为自己是父母的儿子，他拥有一种来自于柏拉图式的自我观念。 在这本小说中，主人公即盖茨比就是一种自认为与众不同的人，他同样拥有柏拉图式的爱情观。他把自己看成是上帝之子，他认为自己应为上帝的事业效劳，他追求一种“博大的，世俗的，虚饰的美”，显然他把自己想象成为基督一样的人物。十七岁的他决定改名，由原来的詹姆斯·盖茨改为杰伊·盖茨比，据说杰伊·盖茨比是英语Jesus， God's boy 发音的变体。但是具有讽刺意味的是，从他改名那一刻起，他开始追求所谓的美和善，也就开始了他的人生悲剧。他把黛西·布坎南视为他追求的那种美的化身。当他见到她时，他知道她已经把他的理想与他的生命气息结合在一起了。他知道他的心要与上帝的心一样，必须专一，绝不可驰心旁骛。当他第一次亲吻她时，“她就像一朵鲜花一样为他绽放，于是这个理想的化身就完成了。”在黛西身上，盖茨比的梦想变得有血有肉。他企求与黛西联袂来实现自己的梦想。 但是，黛西根本无力担任这个角色。她不过是一个一项了为人生最高目标的资产阶级小姐，没有思想，没有情操，浅薄虚假，百无聊赖，无所事事。她绝不可能为实现盖茨比自己的梦想去牺牲自己的既得利益。而盖茨比自己当然不可能实现自己的梦想，他的想法太过虚幻。他和黛西的丈夫汤姆·布坎南都拥有财富，两人的不同之处是他至少用他的财富去追求一种“美”，并竭尽全力去得到它。然

《傲慢与偏见》英文书评

The comment of "Pride and prejudice" Pride and Prejudice is a novel written by the famous English writer, Jane Austen, who was the sixth children in a family of seven and was born in the village of steventon in Hampshire in 1775 an d died of Addison’s disease in 1817. Pride and Prejudice is a love story, mainly tells the love between Elizabeth and Darcy. It divided into 2 volumes and is composed of 42 chapters altogether. The major characters are Mr. Darcy, A rich and proud young man. Elizabeth, the second eldest daughter of Mr. and Mrs. Bennet. Mr. Bingley , A rich young bachelor. Jane, the first daughter of Mr. and Mrs.Bennet. The story begin with Bingley’s arrival. One day when Mrs.Bennet hear Bingley has taken Netherfiel d, a house near her’s. She is so happy and arranged one of her five daughters marriage with him. At a ball, luckly, Bingley and Jane fall in love at the first sight. Darcy, a friend of Bingley’s , was attracted to Elizabeth, a lively and spirited girl. But Darcy greatly offends her by his supercilious behavior and this dislike is increased by Wickham, a dashing young militia officer of the unjust treatment he has met with at Darcy's hands. One day when Darcy and Bingley’s two sisters disgusted with the vulgarity of Mrs. Bennet and her two youngest daughters, effectively separated Bingley and Jane. Meanwhile, Collins, a cousin of Mr. and Mrs. Bennet, married charlotte, a friend of Elizabeth’s, for Elizabeth’s refuse to marry him. But One day Darcy send Elizab eth a letter, in which he justifies the separation of his friend Bingley and Jane and make it clear that Wickham is. So Elizabeth changed her opinions and ideas toward him. Once when Elizabeth visited her uncle and aunt in the north of England, she met Darcy there and witnessed his changes through series of behaviors, no longer pride and become gentle and attentive, all these made their marriage arranged, and they also suitably provided for Bingley and Jane’s reunited and engaged. The story ends with both their happy marriages. Sir Walter Scott 评论 READ again, and for the third time at least, Miss Austen's very finely written novel of "Pride and Prejudice." That young lady has a talent for describing the involvements and feelings and characters of ordinary life which is to me the most wonderful I ever met with. The big bow-wow strain I can do myself like any now going; but the exquisite touch, which renders ordinary commonplace things and characters interesting, from the truth of the description and the sentiment, is denied to me.—From "The Journal of Sir Walter Scott," March, 1826. We bestow no mean compliment upon the author of "Emma" when we say that keeping close to common incidents, and to such characters as occupy the ordinary walks of life, she has produced sketches of such spirit and originality that we never miss the excitation which depends upon a narrative of uncommon events, arising from the consideration of minds, manners, and sentiments, greatly above our own. In this class she stands almost alone; for the scenes of Miss Edgeworth are laid in higher life, varied by more romantic incident, and by her remarkable power of embodying and illustrating national character. But the author of "Emma" confines herself chiefly to the middling classes of society; her most distinguished characters do not rise greatly above well-bred

《了不起的盖茨比》读后感(推荐10篇)

《了不起的盖茨比》读后感（推荐10篇） 这篇《了不起的盖茨比》读后感范文是我们精心挑选的，但原对你有参考作用。 花了几天，断断续续读完该书。其实是昨晚一口气读了后面的70％的内容，读完后却发现没啥特别的感觉，这种感觉早在读完前言时就有了，却因为这是本众人推荐的世界名著，所以坚持读完。 不知是不是很久不读名著了，有些不明白读这些是为了什么了。读历史可以了解史实，读散文可以欣赏其文笔，读名言警句可以励志明理，读言情可以见证主人公的爱恨别离。 那么对这些名著呢？通过主人公的性格遭遇反应出一些道理？反衬出当时的社会风气习俗？批判一些褒奖某种？细想来大概吧。 看来真的是太久没有静下心来读过书了，连读书都带有了一定的目的性，想着读了哪些小说名著或许就能弥补之前落下的功课了！ 看来我真是太急功近利了，想着读一本书要么让我学到什么，要么使我懂得一些，其他便只是走马观花。

还好，我及时反省，明白这是一个长期坚持积累的过程，而非一蹴而就。 一本好书，自然有其值得阅读的道理，或许并非每本我都能读得其真谛懂得其精髓，但总会收获一些我自己的体会和领悟不是么？既如此，便要做好笔记或是记下感悟。日复一日，总归会有所长进！ 来说说盖茨比。我不太懂得他所生活的年代背景，更很少读过外国名著，所以单纯讲他的这些经历，我确实没懂作者说的了不起指什么？ 指对梦想的坚持？对感情的忠贞？还是其他？有人说他偏执，所以也才有了最终的悲剧收场。 有人敬佩他对戴茜的爱矢志不移，痛恨戴茜自私自利纸醉金迷。 想想盖茨比父亲描述中的盖茨比，从小就对自己严格要求，这也就难怪他最后能成为富豪。 可是我真的怀疑他对戴茜的感情，真的是那么坚贞那么不移？或者年轻的时候确实如此，可是时日愈久愈发成了一种执念，亦或只是为了证明？