当前位置：文档库 › GMCustomerSpec Sep08

GMCustomerSpec Sep08

General Motors

Global Purchasing and

Supply Chain

Global Supplier Quality

GM Customer Specifics - ISO/TS 16949

September 2008

Including GM Specific Instructions for PPAP 4th Ed. (see Section 5)

Preface

General Motors Customer Specific Requirements - ISO/TS16949 Including GM Specific Instructions for PPAP 4th Ed. (see Section 5)

NOTE: For convenience, important changes to editions prior to September 2008 of

General Motors Customer Specifics and PPAP Specific Instructions have been

highlighted with underlining. A revision history to the September 2008 Edition is also provided. However, it is the organization’s responsibility to read, understand and apply the entire document.

Table of Contents

Revision History............................................................,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.. (7)

1.0 Scope.................................................................,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,. (11)

2.0 References (11)

3.0 Definitions (12)

Accredited Laboratory - 3.1 (12)

Active Part – 3 (12)

Aftermarket Part(s) – 3.3 (12)

Consulting – 3.4 (12)

Customer – 3.5 .....................................................,., (12)

Ergonomics – 3.6 (12)

Initial Process Study –3.7 (12)

PPM (Parts Per Million –3.8 (13)

Quality Indices – 3.9 (13)

Organization – 3.10 (13)

Service Parts –3.11 (13)

Suppliers –3.12 (13)

4. 0 Requirements

ISO TS 16949:2002 (Second Edition) March 2002 -Related Requirements – 4.1.0..

(14)

Management of production tooling – 4.1.1 (14)

Records Retention – 4.1.2 (14)

Electronic Communication – 4.1.3 (14)

Shipment Notification System – 4.1.4 (15)

Special Characteristics – 4.1.5 (15)

Design Changes – 4.1.6 (15)

Official Language Version – 4.1.7 (15)

Part Approval Process – 4.1.8 (16)

Customer Satisfaction – 4.1.9 (16)

Internal Auditor Qualifications – 4.1.10 (16)

Supplier Quality Management System Development – 4.1.11 (17)

Customer Acceptance of 2nd Party Audits and Criteria for Approval

4.1.11.1 (17)

Supplier Development of Specially Designated Small Suppliers

4.1.11.2 (17)

Heat Treating Processes – 4.1.12 (17)

4.2 General Motors – Specific Requirements

Third Party Registration Requirements – 4.2.1 (18)

General Procedures and Other Requirements – 4.2.2 (18)

Pre-Production/Pilot Material Shipping Procedures – 4.2.2.1 (18)

Shipping Parts Identification Label Standard – 4.2.2.2 (18)

Component Verification & Traceability Procedure – 4.2.2.3 (18)

Traceability Identifier Equipment (TIR 15-300) – 4.2.2.4 (19)

Bar Code Standard for Part/Component/Module Identification and

Traceability – 4.2.2.5 (19)

GP-5 Supplier Quality Processes and Measurements Procedure –

4.2.2.6 (19)

Continuous Improvement Procedure – 4.2.2.7 …………………….… ..19

GP-10 Evaluation and Accreditation Test Facilities – 4.2.2.8 (19)

Shipping and Delivery Performance Requirements – 4.2.2.9 (19)

Key Characteristic Designation System (KCDS) – 4.2.2.10 (19)

GP-11 General Procedure for Pre-Prototype and Prototype Material –

4.2.2.11 (19)

C4 Technology Program, GM - Supplier C4 Information – 4.2.2.12 (19)

GP-12 Early Production Containment Procedure – 4.2.2.13 (19)

Run-at-Rate Procedure – 4.2.2.14 (19)

IS0/TS 169494:2002 Applicability – 4.2.3 (19)

UPC Labeling for Commercial Service Applications – 4.2.4 (19)

Layout Inspection and Functional Test – 4.2.5 (20)

Customer Signature on Control Plan – 4.2.6 (20)

GM Holdens-Specific Requirements – 4.2.7 (20)

Certification Body Notification and Certification Status –“New Business Hold –

Quality” – 4.2.8 (20)

Controlled Shipping Level II (CSII) – Notice to Certification Body – 4.2.9 (21)

Management Review 4.2.10 (21)

5.0 PPAP – GM Specific Instructions

Applicability – 5.1 (21)

Requirements for Approval – 5.2 ................................................, (21)

PSW Form – 5.2.1 (21)

Acceptance Approval Report – 5.2.2 (21)

Sample Production Parts – 5.2.3 (22)

Control Plans – 5.2.4 (22)

Design Records – 5.2.5 (22)

Design Failure Mode and Effects Analysis - 5.2.6 (23)

Material/Performance Test Results – 5.2.7 .............................. .. (23)

International Material Data System (IMDS) 5.2.7.1 (24)

Customer Notification of Supplier - Initiated Changes – 5.2.8 (24)

Submission Levels – 5.2.9 (24)

Part Submission Status – 5.3 (25)

Approved 5.3.1 (25)

PPAP – 5.3.2 (25)

Examples of Saleable PPAP - 5.3.2.1 ..............................,,.. (25)

Non-Saleable PPAP – 5.3.3 ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,26 Examples of Non-Saleable PPAP – 5.3.3.1 (26)

Rejected PPAP 5.3.4 (26)

Driver Codes – 5.4

PPAP Worksheet (GM1411) – 5.5

5.5.1 Detailed Instructions for Completing the PPAP Worksheet

(GM1411)

Revision History - March 2006 Edition

1. Scope

ISO/TS 16949:2002, Second Edition, March 1, 2002, “Quality management systems – Particular requirements for the application of ISO 9001:2000 for automotive production and relevant service part organizations,” and this document define General Motors fundamental quality system requirements for organizations where automotive customer-specified parts, for production and/or service are manufactured. Third party certification to ISO/TS 16949 shall meet the following conditions: ?The certification scope must include both ISO/TS 16949 and the accompanying ISO/TS 16949 GM-Customer Specific Requirements,

?The certification must be conducted in compliance with the IATF recognized automotive certification scheme by a certification body currently contracted and recognized by an IATF

Oversight office.

All ISO/TS 16949:2002 requirements including the requirements of this document shall be addressed in the organization’s quality management system.

NOTE: QS-9000 expired 12/14/06. References to QS-9000 and its applicability are replaced by ISO/TS16949 in the GM Customer Specific Requirements. This also includes those references to QS-9000 pertaining to GM requirements not identified in this particular document, e.g GM Purchase Agreement Terms and Conditions.

2. References

2.1 Chrysler, Ford Motor, General Motors Production Part Approval Process PPAP), Fourth

Edition, March 2006.

2.2 Chrysler, Ford Motor, General Motors Statistical Process Control (SPC),

Second Edition, July 2005.

2.3 Chrysler, Ford Motor, General Motors Advanced Product Quality Planning and Control Plan,

APQP Second Edition July 2008. Effective November 2008.

2.4 Chrysler, Ford Motor, General Motors Measurement Systems Analysis, MSA Third Edition,

March 2002. (Second Printing May 2003).

2.5 Chrysler, Ford Motor, General Motors Potential Failure Mode and Effects Analysis, FMEA

Fourth Edition, July 2008. Effective November 2008.

2.6 IATF Guidance to ISO/TS 16949:2002, AIAG Edition, 2002.

2.7 Automotive Certification Scheme for ISO/TS 16949:2002, Rules for Achieving IATF

Recognition, Second Edition for ISO/TS 16949:2002, May 2004.

2.8 ISO/TS 16949:2002, 1st Edition, March 2002 (Corrected version December 2003)

The list above contains the most current editions. However, the latest edition of the reference documents listed applies unless otherwise specified by the GM Procuring Division. Copies of PPAP, APQP, FMEA, MSA, SPC, IATF Guidance, ISO/TS 16949:2002 Rules, 2nd Edition, and ISO/TS 16949:2002 and other related manuals are available from AIAG at https://www.wendangku.net/doc/852074506.html,. Copies of ISO documents are available from the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) at https://www.wendangku.net/doc/852074506.html,. Certain documents listed above are requirements documents and are described as such in section 4 of this document. Section 5 of this document contains the GM PPAP Specific Instructions and is also a requirements document.

3. Definitions

Where inconsistent terminology exists between ISO/TS 16949:2002 and this document, this document shall take precedence. Otherwise the definitions from ISO/TS 16949:2002 apply to this document.

3.1 Accredited Laboratory

An accredited laboratory is one that has been independently evaluated for technical competence. The criteria for evaluation are based on ISO/IEC 17025, or national equivalent. Accreditation is performed by qualified agencies (public or private) operating in accordance with ISO/IEC 17011.

NOTE: The above definition also applies to the reference manuals in Section 2 of this document and currently in effect.

3.2 Active Part

An active part is one currently being supplied to the customer for original equipment or service applications. The part remains active until tooling scrap authorization is given by the appropriate customer activity. For parts with no customer-owned tooling or situations where multiple parts are made from the same tool, written confirmation from the customer Purchasing activity is required to deactivate a part.

NOTE: For bulk material, “active part” refers to the bulk material contracted, not the parts that

are subsequently produced from that material.

3.3 Aftermarket Parts

Aftermarket parts are replacement parts not procured or released by OEM for service part applications which may or may not be produced to original equipment specifications.

3.4 Consulting

For the purposes of TS16949:2002, consulting is the provision of training, documentation development, or assistance with implementation of quality systems to a specific customer. If these activities are open to the public, advertised, and not customer specific, they are considered training rather than consulting. Other products, processes or services may be offered directly or indirectly, provided they do not compromise confidentiality or the objectivity or impartiality of its certification process or decisions. Refer to Automotive Certification Scheme for ISO/TS 16949:2002 (Rules, 2nd Edition). Also see ISO/IEC 17021.

3.5 Customer

References to “customer” in ISO/TS 16949:2002 and this document shall be interpreted as the Procuring Division of General Motors for suppliers pursuing third party registration to ISO/TS

16949:2002 to satisfy General Motors sourcing requirements third party quality system assessment registration.

3.6 Ergonomics

Ergonomics is the evaluation of the design of a product or process to assure compatibility with the capabilities of human beings. Analysis of motion refers to capabilities of people with respect to tasks (e.g. lifting, twisting, reaching) to prevent or relieve problems of strain, stress, excessive fatigue, etc. Factors involved include anatomical dimensions of the worker, placement of products to be worked upon, placement of buttons/switches, physical loads imposed on the worker, and environmental effects such as noise, vibration, lighting and space.

3.7 Initial Process Study

Initial Process Studies are short-term studies conducted to obtain early information on the performance of new or revised processes relative to internal or customer requirements. In many cases, preliminary studies should be conducted at several points in the evolution of new processes (e.g. at the equipment or tooling subcontractor’s plant, after installation at the supplier’s plant). These studies should be based on as many measures as possible. When utilizing X-Bar and R charts, at least twenty-five subgroups (minimum of four pieces per sub-group) are required to obtain sufficient data for decision-making. When this amount of data is not available, control charts should be started with whatever data is available, or contact the authorized customer representative to develop a suitable plan. See also

the Production Part Approval Process (PPAP) manual.

NOTE: Initial Process Studies. The purpose of the initial process study is to understand the process variation, not just to achieve a specific index value. When historical data are available or enough initial data exist to plot a control chart (at least 100 individual samples), C pk can be calculated when the process is stable. Otherwise, for processes with known and predictable special causes and output meeting specifications, P pk should be used. When not enough data are available (< 100 samples) or there are unknown sources of variation, contact the authorized customer representative to develop a suitable plan.

3.8 PPM (Parts per Million)

PPM for a GM supply organization is impacted when both of the following conditions exist: ?Quality PRR is written with quantity discrepant and

?There are receipts for referenced part and duns number within the previous twelve months.

PPM for a supplier manufacturing duns is calculated monthly using the following formula:

1 Total all the “estimated quantity nonconforming” for all part numbers for th at location

Note: Actual quantity nonconforming is used for supplier initiated PRR’s.

2 Divide by total receipts for that location

3 Multiply by 1,000,000.

3.9 Quality Indices

See current edition of the DaimlerChrysler, Ford, General Motors Statistical Process Control reference manual.

3.10 Organization

Organizations are defined as providers of: a) production materials, b) production or service parts, or c) heat treating, plating, painting or other finishing services, directly to General Motors or other customers subscribing to this document.

NOTE: See ISO/TS 16949:2002, Section 3 Terms and definitions.

3.11 Service parts

Replacement parts manufactured to OEM specifications, which are procured or released by the OEM for service part application.

3.12Suppliers

Suppliers are defined as providers of production materials, or production or service parts, directly to an organization who is a provider of General Motors or other customers subscribing to this document. Also included are organizations who are providers of heat-treating, painting, plating or other finishing services.

NOTE: The term “tier supplier(s)” refers to suppliers at any tier level in the automotive supply

chain.

3.13 Value-Added Production Processes

Activities or operations for which a customer is willing to pay, if given the option.

See also ISO/TS 16949:2002, Second Edition(March, 2002), definition of “manufacturing” 3.1.6, “site”

3.1.11, and “remote location” 3.1.10.

4. Requirements

4.1 ISO TS 16949:2002 (Second Edition), March 2002- Related Requirements

All references to clauses in this section pertain to ISO/TS 16949:2002, unless otherwise stated.

4.1.1 Management of production tooling

Where warehouses or distribution centers (distributors) are remote sites, the requirements for management of production tooling (cl.7.5.1.5) may not be applicable.

4.1.2 Records Retention

Production part approvals, tooling records, APQP records, purchase orders and amendments shall be maintained for the length of time that the part (or family of parts) is active (see definitions in Cl. 3.2) for production and service requirements plus one calendar year unless otherwise specified by the customer.

NOTE: All customer purchase orders/amendments are included in this requirement.

Organization purchase orders/amendments for customer-owned tooling are included in this

requirement.

Quality performance records (e.g. control charts, inspection and test results) shall be retained for one calendar year after the year in which they were created.

Records of internal quality system audits and management review shall be retained for three years. Retention periods longer than those specified above may be specified by an organization in their procedures. The organization shall eventually dispose of records.

These requirements do not supersede any regulatory requirements. All specified retention periods shall be considered “minimums”.

NOTE: The customer or procuring division may specify alternative record retention periods

applicable to designated holders of GM Business Records.

4.1.3 Electronic Communication

Reference cl.7.2.3.1

NOTE: Examples of such systems for suppliers to GM’s North American Operations are: 1)

requirement planning information such as the Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) ANSI ASC X12

830 transaction set or the EDIFACT DELFOR message, and 2) shipping schedules such as the ANSI ASC X12 862 or 866 transaction sets or the EDIFACT DELJIT message.

4.1.4 Shipment Notification System

Reference cl. 7.2.3.1

NOTE: Examples of such systems for suppliers to GM’s North American Operations are: 1)

the ANSI ASC X12 856 transaction set, or 2) the EDIFACT DESADV message. For EDI

assistance, contact 01-810-947-5566. For EDIFACT assistance, and confirmation of the

required implementation date for a supplier, contact: 01-248-265-9907.

4.1.5 Special Characteristics

The supplier shall use General Motors Key Characteristic Designation System definitions and symbols to comply with ISO/TS 16949:2002 special characteristics requirements

(e.g. cl. 7.2.1.1), and as provided in 4.2.2, General Procedures and Other Requirements, and 4.2.2.11, Key Characteristic Designation System (KCDS), (GM 1805 QN) which defines GM’s approach to “special” characteristics.

NOTE: GMW 15049 replaces GM 1805 QN for all global programs beginning with 2009 MY and all other programs beginning in 2010.

4.1.6 Design Changes

All design changes, including those proposed by suppliers, shall have written approval by the authorized customer representative, or waiver of such approval, prior to production implementation. See cl. 7.3.7 and 7.1.4. See also the Production Part Approval Process (PPAP) manual.

For proprietary designs, impact on form, fit, function, performance, and/or durability shall be determined in conjunction with the authorized customer representative so that all effects can be properly evaluated.

4.1.7 Official Language Version

The English language version of ISO/TS 16949:2002 or related reference documents shall be the official version for purposes of third party registration.

Sanctioned translations shall:

?be for reference only,

?reference the English language as the official version,

?not contain ISO 9001:2000 text verbatim, and

?include General Motors in the copyright statement.

Any other language translations are not authorized.

4.1.8 Part Approval Process

The organization shall comply with the Chrysler, Ford, GM Production Part Approval Process (PPAP) manual to comply with cl. 7.3.6.3

NOTE: PPAP-Vehicle Assembly Centers (Assembly Plants)

Unless otherwise specified by the Customer, PPAP requirements for vehicle assembly centers shall be taken from a specified production run of saleable pilot vehicles.

4.1.9 Customer Satisfaction

Trends in quality system performance and customer satisfaction (see Cl. 5.2, 5.6.1.1, 7.4.3.2, and

8.2.1.1) should be compared to those of competitors, or appropriate benchmarks, and reviewed by top management.

4.1.10 Internal Auditor Qualifications

Internal auditors should be qualified as recommended in ISO 19011, 1st Edition – Sections 7.1-7.5, for Quality Management Systems application. In addition internal auditors should be competent in understanding and applying the Process Approach of Auditing (See “Process Approach”, Section 0.2 of ISO/TS 16949:2002), Core Tools including PPAP and other reference manuals including APQP, MSA, SPC, and FMEA and GM Customer Specifics, as applicable.

NOTE: A process and plan with implementation monitoring for assurance of qualified internal

auditors is evidence of compliance.

4.1.11 Supplier Quality Management System Development (cl. 7.4.1.2)

NOTE 1: This supplier development clause, cl. 7.4.1.2, applies to suppliers of the organization who are providers of production materials, or production or service parts, directly to a supplier to Chrysler, Ford, General Motors or other customers subscribing to

this document. Also included are providers of heat-treating, painting, plating or other finishing

services.

Indirect and service providers are not included in this requirement, e.g. distributors adding no

manufacturing value, logistics, sequencers, parts packagers, tooling & equipment.

NOTE 2: The use of customer-designated suppliers to the organization (subcontractors) does not relieve or eliminate the responsibility of the supplier for ensuring the quality of subcontracted parts, materials and services.

4.1.11.1 Customer acceptance of 2nd Party Audits and Criteria for Approval General Motors Corporation will recognize 2nd Party audits as compliance to ISO/TS 16949:2002, Clause 7.4.1.2 and as an alternative to ISO 9001:2000 certification. The statement of authorization below provides the requirements and conditions for GM approval.

The organization that utilizes 2nd party assessment to comply with clause 7.4.1.2 is required by General Motors to utilize second party assessors who satisfy all elements of the criteria specified as “GM approved 2nd Party requirements” stated below.

GM-approved 2nd Party requirements:

1. The organization (2nd Party) must be IATF certified and registered to ISO/TS16949:200

2. The organization (2nd Party) cannot be on ISO/TS 16949:2002 probation or suspension.

3. The organization (2nd Party) must utilize a qualified ISO Lead Auditor, or a qualified Internal Auditor with evidence of their successful completion of training, such as AIAG "Internal Auditing for ISO/TS 16949:2002," or evidence of a minimum of five internal ISO/TS 16949 audits under the supervision of a qualified Lead Auditor.

4. The organization (2nd Party) must audit annually each qualifying supplier for whom it has performed a 2nd Party assessment, and maintain records of these audits.

5. The duration of these audits must conform to the full application of the Audit Day Requirements table of the current edition of Automotive Certification Scheme for ISO/TS 16949:2002, Rules 2nd Edition, for achieving IATF recognition.

6. Any of the IATF recognized and currently approved auditors may perform such audits when contracted by the organization.

4.1.11.2 Supplier Development of Specially Designated Small Suppliers

When a supplier to an organization is so small as to not have adequate resources to develop a system according to ISO/TS 16949:2002 or ISO 9001:2000, certain specified elements may be waived by the organization of their supplier. The organization shall have decision criteria for determining “specially designated small suppliers”’. Such decision criteria will be in writing, and applied consistently in the application of this provision. The existence and use of such decision criteria shall be verified by 3rd party auditors.

NOTE 1: ISO9001:2000 and ISO/TS16949:2002 contain fundamental quality management system requirements of value to any size of provider of production/ service parts/ materials. There are a number of methods to implement a compliant system, so it is recognized that a simpler Quality Management System approach could be used for the smaller suppliers of organizations to which ISO/TS 16949, clause 7.4.1.2 applies.

NOTE 2: “Small” may also refer to volume supplied to automotive.

4.1.12 Heat Treating Processes

Clause 8.2.2.2 of ISO/TS 16949:2002 requires that the organization shall audit each manufacturing process to determine its effectiveness. Applicability and effectiveness of heat treating processes shall be determined utilizing CQI-9, 2nd Edition, Special Process: Heat Treat System Assessment (HTSA), published by AIAG, and records maintained. The effectiveness evaluation shall include the organization’s self-assessment, actions taken, and that records are maintained.

This requirement shall also apply to heat treat suppliers to the organization pursuant to ISO/TS 16949:2002 Clause 7.4.1.2 (supplier development clause).

NOTE 1: Implementation is 120 days following the release of CQI-9, 2nd Edition, Special Process: Heat Treat System Assessment (HTSA). Based on the release date of CQI-9, 2nd Edition, the effective date of implementation to the revisions is January 7, 2008.

NOTE 2: 2nd Party assessment by a competent auditor and meeting the above requirements will satisfy the self-assessment requirement.

NOTE 3: Implementation effectiveness should be based on evidence that the organization has a process in place that includes elements such as auditors identified, schedule for self-assessment in place including schedule adherence, supplier development process identified for applicable suppliers, monitoring of progress, defined corrective action process and record-keeping.

4.1.13 Plating Processes

Clause 8.2.2.2 of ISO/TS 16949:2002 requires that the organization shall audit each manufacturing process to determine its effectiveness. Applicability and effectiveness of plating processes shall be determined utilizing CQI-11 Special Process: Plating System Assessment (PSA), published by AIAG, and record s maintained. The effectiveness evaluation shall include the organization’s self-assessment, actions taken, and that records are maintained.

This requirement shall also apply to plating suppliers to the organization pursuant to ISO/TS 16949:2002 Clause 7.4.1.2 (supplier development clause).

NOTE 1: Implementation is 120 days following the release of CQI-11 Special Process: Plating System Assessment (PSA). Based on the release date of CQI-11, the effective date of implementation is January 7, 2008.

NOTE 2: 2nd Party assessment by a competent auditor and meeting the above requirements will satisfy the self-assessment requirement.

4.1.14 Coating Processes

Clause 8.2.2.2 of ISO/TS 16949:2002 requires that the organization shall audit each manufacturing process to determine its effectiveness. Applicability and effectiveness of coating processes shall be determined utilizing CQI-12 Special Process: Coating System Assessment (CSA), published by AIAG, and records maintained. The effectiveness evaluation shall include the organization’s self-assessment, actions taken, and that records are maintained.

This requirement shall also apply to coating suppliers to the organization pursuant to ISO/TS

16949:2002 Clause 7.4.1.2 (supplier development clause).

NOTE 1: Implementation is 120 days following the release of CQI-12, Special Process: Coating System Assessment (CSA). Based on the release date of CQI-12, the effective date of implementation is January 7, 2008.

NOTE 2: 2nd Party assessment by a competent auditor and meeting the above requirements will satisfy the self-assessment requirement.

4.2 General Motors - Specific Requirements

4.2.1 Third-Party Registration Requirements

Production and Service Part Organizations (direct supply organizations) to General Motors, including GM Holdens, shall be third-party registered to ISO/TS 16949:2002, including the requirements in this document, by an IATF-recognized certification body using the current edition in effect of the automotive registration scheme, “Automotive Certification Scheme for ISO/TS 16949:2002, Rules for achieving IATF recognition.”

NOTE 1: Waiver of supply organization certification for those organizations who meet the

applicability requirements of ISO/TS 16949:2002 is not permitted unless approved in writing by an authorized representative of GM and consistent with current GM GPSC policy and

procedure.

4.2.2 General Procedures and Other Requirements

The GM publications listed below contain additional requirements or guidance that shall be met, if applicable, by GM supply organizations, or unless otherwise specified by GM Procuring Divisions. Specific questions on the content of these publications should be directed to the appropriate authorized customer representative at the GM Procuring Division. (The latest revisions for these documents can be found on the GM SupplyPower website.)

GM Supply Organizations shall verify annually that they are using the latest version of these documents:

4.2.2.1 Pre-Production/Pilot Material Shipping Procedures, (GM 1407).

4.2.2.2 Shipping Parts Identification Label Standard, (GM 1724).

4.2.2.3 Component Verification & Traceability Procedure, (GM 1730). (EXPIRED)

Note: APPLICABILITY OF GM 1730 LIMITED TO GM POWERTRAIN expired August 2006.. The document is expired and this reference is for informational purposes.

4.2.2.4 Traceability Identifier Equipment (TIR 15-300), (GM 1731).

4.2.2.5 Bar Code Standard for Part/Component/Module Identification and Traceability

(GM 1737).

4.2.2.6 GP-5 Supplier Quality Processes and Measurements Procedure, (GM 1746).

4.2.2.7 Continuous Improvement Procedure, (GM 1747).

4.2.2.8 GP-10 Evaluation and Accreditation Test Facilities, (GM 1796/A).

- See ISO/TS 16949:2002, cl., 7.6.3

4.2.2.9 Shipping and Delivery Performance Requirements, (GM 1797).

4.2.2.10 Key Characteristic Designation System (KCDS),(GM 1805 QN).

Note: GMW 15049 replaces GM 1805 QN for all global programs beginning with 2009 MY and all other programs beginning in 2010.

4.2.2.11 GP-11 General Procedure for Pre-Prototype and Prototype Material, (GM 1820).

4.2.2.12 Supplier Technology Information Global, (GM 1825) (replaced C4 and is currently found in GM Supply Power/Engineering Library/Global/GEES Operations/Supplier Connectivity/GM 1825 doc.).

4.2.2.13 GP-12 Early Production Containment Procedure, (GM 1920).

4.2.2.14 Run-at-Rate Procedure, (GM 1960).

4.2.3 ISO/TS 16949:2002 Applicability

ISO/TS 16949:2002 with this document applies to all applicable contracted GM supply organizations (see Definitions 3.10) utilizing ISO/TS 16949 to satisfy General Motors third party certification requirements for quality system assessment unless otherwise approved by the GPSC authorized management representative. (GPSC – GM Global Purchasing and Supply Chain).

NOTE: QS-9000:1998 (3rd Edition) expired December 14, 2006. Failure of supply organizations to achieve or maintain certification to ISO/TS 16949:2002 may result in the organization being placed in New Business Hold - Quality, or other action determined by GM.

4.2.4 UPC Labeling For Commercial Service Applications

GM Service Parts Operations (SPO) requires use of UPC labeling for certain commercial applications rather than AIAG labeling. Contact your SPO buyer for instructions.

4.2.5 Layout Inspection and Functional Test

Unless specified otherwise by a GM Procuring Division, there is no customer-established frequency for layout inspection after receiving production part approval (PPAP). Reference is made to ISO/TS 16949:2002, cl..8.2.4.1

4.2.6 Customer Signature on Control Plan

General Motors does not provide waivers to organizations for control plan approval because General Motors signatures on the Control Plan are not required.

4.2.7 GM Holdens-Specific Requirements

Previously listed specific requirements for additional documents for GM Holdens in Australia are obsolete. GM Holdens operates in accordance with GM Customer Specifics.

4.2.8 Certification Body Notification and Certification Status –“New Business Hold – Q uality”