文档库 最新最全的文档下载
当前位置:文档库 › How classroom environment and student engagement affect learning in Internet-based MBA cour

How classroom environment and student engagement affect learning in Internet-based MBA cour

How classroom environment and student engagement affect learning in Internet-based MBA cour
How classroom environment and student engagement affect learning in Internet-based MBA cour

How Classroom Environment and

Student Engagement Affect Learning in Internet-based MBA Courses

J. B. Arbaugh

University of Wisconsin, Oshkosh

While the number of college courses being delivered via the internet is increasing rapidly, our knowledge of what makes these courses effective learning experiences for students is still limited. Therefore, I conducted a study that examined the

effects of technological, pedagogical, and student characteristics on student learn-ing in Internet-based MBA courses. Of these characteristics, I found that only

those reflecting instructor efforts to create an interactive classroom environment were significantly associated with student learning. Other characteristics such as the perceived ease of use of the course software package, the perceived flexibility of the online classroom environment, and the amount of time students spent logged onto the course Website were not significantly associated with student learning.

These findings suggest that while some level of technological sophistication may be important, teaching expertise may be the primary criterion for teaching success in the online classroom environment. Therefore, instructors may need to spend more time developing and cultivating instructional skills such as simultaneously working with several smaller groups of students, developing interesting discussion questions, and fostering intimacy. To support this faculty development, business schools will likely need to make substantial infrastructural investments to ensure that their

online course offerings are pedagogically and technologically conducive to student learning.

Key words: Internet-based courses, computer-mediated interaction, dis-

tance learning, pedagogy and technology

W HILE DISTANCE EDUCATION has traditionally been

conducted by such means as correspondence or voice or video transmission (Gibson & Gibson, 1995), distance education is increasingly conducted via the Internet. Internet-based courses are classes that are delivered primarily or exclusively via the use of E-mail and/or web pages. While Internet-based courses are presently a single pedagogical approach within the field of dis-

9

Business Communication Quarterly, Volume 63, Number 4, December 2000, pages 9-26

? 2000 by the Association for Business Communication

tance education, the movement toward delivery of distance edu-cation via the Internet is accelerating rapidly. While fewer than 100 colleges and/or universities offered Internet-based courses as recently as 1993 (Hankin, 1999), presently about two-thirds of the 3,200 accredited 4-year colleges and graduate schools in the US now offer courses via the Internet (Clarke, 1999). Business schools have taken the lead in extending this emerging trend to graduate degree programs. At least 25 AACSB-accredited US schools now provide entirely online MBA programs, with many others offering MBA courses via the Internet (

https://www.wendangku.net/doc/a25408471.html,>, 2000). The acceleration of this trend is due to a variety of factors such as technological advances in both course software and computing capacity, competitive pressures from external stakeholders and alternative sources of education (Moore, 1997; Rahm & Reed, 1997), positive experiences of early adopters (Greco, 1999), and declining MBA enrollments

(MacLellan & Dobson, 1997).

In spite of this growth, there still are concerns about Internet-based courses and programs. Some of these concerns are the inten-sive commitment of time and labor to both develop and take the courses, lack of face-to-face interaction, and questions about their quality relative to traditional classroom-based courses (Dumont,1996; Grossman, 1999). Combine these concerns with the limited research on Internet-based courses in graduate business education (Arbaugh, 2000a; Ellram & Easton, 1999), and the contention that we may be racing to adopt educational techniques without fully understanding them may be justified (Grossman, 1999).

These concerns prompt at least two questions for graduate busi-ness educators: (1) Can graduate business students learn effec-tively via the Internet? and (2) What factors are most likely to influence student learning in Internet-based MBA courses? Since most of the research to this point on Internet-based courses in business education has been either macro-theoretical approaches to delivery (Leidner & Jarvenpaa, 1995), anecdotal examples

(Ellram & Easton, 1999; Taylor, 1996), or atheoretical empirical studies (Arbaugh, 2000b; Hiltz & Wellman, 1997), additional Business Communication Quarterly 63:4December 2000__________________________________________________________________________10

theory-driven empirical research is needed so that criteria for

developing Internet-based courses where students can learn effec-tively are established. Initial efforts to examine this question have focused on comparing student performance in online and tradi-tional classroom settings (Arbaugh, 2000b; Hiltz & Wellman,

1997). The plethora of studies suggesting no significant difference between other types of distance learning and classroom learning have failed to convince many educators of the effectiveness of dis-tance education, so most likely the same will be true for Internet-based courses (Russell, 1997). Also, these previous studies have tended to focus on examination performance, which is subject to problems such as how to compare exam performance across differ-ent courses and different subject matter and the possibility that examination scores may be influenced more by student compli-ance than by student learning (Gorham, 1988).

This article provides some preliminary answers to the two

research questions raised earlier. I examined the level of perceived learning in Internet-based MBA courses and some variables that may influence it using a sample of Internet-based MBA courses at the University of Wisconsin Oshkosh. T o identify these variables, I examined the research literatures of technology adoption, com-puter-mediated communication, and general distance education.From these literatures, I identified four general factors that may influence student learning in Internet-based courses: (1) the per-ceived usefulness and ease of use of the course Website; (2) the

level of educational flexibility for students and faculty as a result of the asynchronous nature of these courses; (3) the ease of and emphasis on interaction as teaching pedagogy; and (4) student experience with and engagement in Internet-based courses. Of

these factors, I found that while students may be able to learn effec-tively in an Internet-based course, only variables associated with classroom interaction were significantly associated with this learn-ing. These findings suggest that graduate business teachers and pro-grams should give attention to cultivating their skill in facilitating and generating student interaction along with developing the tech-nological skill necessary to teach Internet-based courses.Internet-based MBA Courses / Arbaugh __________________________________________________________________________11

The remainder of this article is divided into three sections.First, the information technology and distance education litera-tures are reviewed to develop a theoretical foundation for the study. Then, I discuss the results of a study of a multi-course,multi-discipline, multi-instructor study at my university. Last,some implications from the findings are developed to assist

researchers, educators, and business schools in future attempts to study and develop Internet-based courses and programs.

Some Theoretical Underpinnings of Online Learning The literature provides several dimensions along which to frame the study of distance learning.

The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)

Given the role that technology plays in Internet-based education and the relative newness of this method of course delivery, the T echnology Acceptance Model (TAM) seems particularly helpful for predicting whether and why learning takes place in Internet-based courses. The two prominent variables in this model are the perceived usefulness of a technology and the perceived ease of use of a technology (Davis, 1989; Davis, Bagozzi, & Warshaw, 1989).Perceived usefulness has been defined as an indicator of the extent to which a person believes that using a particular technology will enhance their performance, and therefore represents an indicator of an individual’s extrinsic motivation to use a technology. Conversely,perceived ease of use refers to the degree to which a person believes that the use of a particular technology will be free of effort, and is therefore an indicator of an individual’s intrinsic motivation to use a technology (Atkinson & Kydd, 1997; Davis, 1989). Therefore,according to this model, beliefs that a new application of technol-ogy is useful and easy to use influence the users’ attitudes toward the technology and thereby their decision to use the technology. This model has become well accepted in the information technology lit-erature and has been found as a valid predictor of usage of computer software (Bagozzi, Davis, & Warshaw, 1992), E-mail (Gefen &Straub, 1997) and the Web (Atkinson & Kydd, 1997).

Business Communication Quarterly 63:4December 2000__________________________________________________________________________12

In the context of Internet-based courses, this model suggests that higher levels of perceived usefulness and the ease of use of the delivery medium (course Website, software, and the like.) will enhance students’ attitudes toward their course experience,

extrinsically motivate their performance in the course and, there-fore, further engage them in the learning process.

The Role of Flexibility in Internet-based Education

Since Internet-based courses depend on computers (Leidner &Jarvenpaa, 1995), the literature on computer-mediated communi-cations (CMC) would seem to be a useful source of information for possible predictors of learning. An emerging perspective

within CMC research, developed in part from social information processing theory (Chidambaram, 1996; Walther, 1992), suggests that rather than inhibiting interaction and social bonding as com-monly assumed, the flexibility inherent in CMC vehicles such as Internet-based courses may help groups to reach levels of rela-tional intimacy comparable those in to face-to-face groups, albeit over a longer time period. According to this perspective, flexibil-ity in the course comes as a result of the medium’s being both place- and time-independent, allowing course conversations to continue over time with periodic interruptions for reflection and personal processing (Dede, 1990; Harasim, 1990). As a result, the Internet-based classroom can become a “virtual learning space”where dynamic interaction supported by collaborative learning structures produces enhanced conceptual thinking based on the cultivation of multiple points of view (Leidner & Jarvenpaa, 1995;Brandon & Hollingshead, 1999).

The time- and place-independence available through CMC

media allows students to have a high degree of flexibility in when and where they participate in Internet-based courses. This flexi-bility is particularly attractive for graduate management educa-tion. The typical consumers of graduate business education, man-agers or aspiring managers, have had to manage increasing levels of conflict among their jobs, family, and work-related travel throughout the 1990s (Dumont, 1996; Greco, 1999).

Internet-based MBA Courses / Arbaugh __________________________________________________________________________13

Interaction in Internet-based Courses

In the context of distance education, interaction has been defined in terms of four dimensions: (1) learner-to-instructor; (2) learner-to-learner; (3) learner-to-content; and learner-to-interface (Hill-man, Willis, & Gunawardena; 1994; Moore, 1989). The criticality of the role of these dimensions of interaction in the learning

process has been emphasized in initial research on Internet-based courses. Theoretical work by Leidner and Jarvenpaa (1995)implies that a collaborative learning model would best suit an

Internet-based MBA course because of the asynchronous nature of the medium and the relatively high level of prior business experi-ence of the students. Initial evidence suggests that the “verbal”behavior of both the students and the instructor is critical for a successful Internet-based MBA course (Arbaugh, 2000b; Hiltz &Wellman, 1997). Prior studies of computer-mediated communica-tions (CMC) in general, and Internet-based courses in particular suggest greater volume and more equal student participation in electronically-generated class discussions than in traditional class-rooms (Bailey & Cotlar, 1994; Strauss, 1996). However, this

learner-to-learner interaction tends to be less efficient because the lack of face-to-face interaction makes it more difficult initially to exchange information and develop social ties (Flaherty, Pearce, &Rubin, 1998; Warkentin, Sayeed, & Hightower, 1997). However,once participants become comfortable with communicating via computer, information exchange and social ties develop due to a shift in the participants’ perception of the communication medium and perceived higher quality outcomes of their work compared to the exclusive use of face-to-face discussions (Chi-dambaram, 1996; Gallupe, Dennis, Cooper, Valacich, Bastianutti,& Nunamaker, 1992).

In spite of the possible difficulty associated with interaction in Internet-based courses, information technology and communica-tion theorists suggest that fitting the medium to the appropriate learning model can help to enhance interaction within the Inter-net-based course. Other researchers have suggested that instruc-tors need to learn a different set of teaching skills for transitioning Business Communication Quarterly 63:4December 2000__________________________________________________________________________14

into this role of discussion facilitator and manager (Brandon &Hollingshead, 1999), which includes, in part, intentional efforts to achieve verbal immediacy (Freitas, Myers, & Avtgis, 1998;Gorham, 1988) and use of a more conversational style in online comments to help enhance student participation and discussion (Ahearn, Peck, & Laycock, 1992). These findings suggest that instructors need to emphasize each of the three dimensions of

interaction within their Internet-based courses and develop meth-ods to facilitate them.

Student Engagement in Internet-based Courses

Prior studies have shown that computing experience is a strong predictor of attitudes toward computers, computer usage (Dyck &Smither, 1994; Whitley, 1997), and Internet usage (Atkinson &Kydd, 1997). In order to gain this experience, users have to spend time engaging computers in a variety of tasks or other activities.Similarly, the amount of experience gained in working with Inter-net-based courses is expected to enhance their attitudes toward these courses and their performance skill. In an Internet-based

course environment, this experience has been associated with log-ging on to a course’s Website more frequently, spending more time logged onto a course’s Website, and more likely taking additional courses via the medium in the future (Hiltz, 1994; Ridley & Sam-mour, 1994). This implies that students who spend more time on the Internet-based course are more likely to be satisfied with the experience and take more ownership of the learning process,thereby increasing their own learning.

Research Method

To answer the research questions presented above, I conducted a survey (Fraenkel & Wallen, 1990).

Survey Sample

The sample was the entire population of class sections conducted using Lotus LearningSpace course software in the MBA program of the University of Wisconsin Oshkosh in 1999. This population Internet-based MBA Courses / Arbaugh __________________________________________________________________________15

was less than 10 percent of the MBA class sections offered by this university during the period of the study. The students in these courses were enrolled in the university’s traditional MBA program and were also taking regular classroom courses. The courses in the study were Investment Management (MBA elective course),

Organizational Foundations (MBA foundations course), Organiza-tional Leadership and Change, Process and Quality Improvement,and two sections of Professional Skills (all MBA management core courses).

Each course in the study was administered via its respective Website using Lotus LearningSpace software. The five sectors of this software package and their roles are described in Table 1. Stu-dents completed the survey either in class or on their own from the course Website in less than fifteen minutes. Any non-respond-ing students were mailed a copy of the survey that they could complete at their convenience. The student response rate was 71.5 percent (97 of 128).

Measurement of Variables

I used several items to measure each of the variables I included in the study. Unless otherwise mentioned, each was measured using seven-point Likert-type scales. Student learning was measured using Alavi’s (1994) six-item scale. This scale has been a highly reliable measure of student learning in previous studies of distance education courses (Alavi, 1994; Alavi, Yoo, & Vogel, 1997). The scale was also reliable in this study. A factor analysis revealed that these items loaded onto a single common factor with all items loading at .81 or higher and a coefficient alpha of .92.

To measure the variables in the TAM (Perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use of a technology), I modified previously used scales by having them refer specifically to the LearningSpace soft-ware package. These scales are four items for each of the two vari-ables and have been used extensively in prior studies (Atkinson &Kydd, 1997; Davis, 1989; Davis et al., 1989; Gefen & Straub,1997). In this study, factor analysis of these items produced two factors that were consistent with findings of previous TAM stud-Business Communication Quarterly 63:4December 2000__________________________________________________________________________16

ies. The lowest factor loadings were .87 for perceived usefulness and .76 for perceived ease of use, with coefficient alphas of .94 and .88 respectively.

I measured perceived flexibility with an eight-item scale used in recent studies of Internet-based courses (Arbaugh, 2000a) focus-ing on the course’s format and their ability to arrange their involvement in the course around work, family, and travel. Factor analysis of these items identified two variables: (1) course flexibil-ity, or the ability to arrange the work of the individual course around other activities; and (2) program flexibility, or the ability to arrange the course to serve a student’s needs to complete the entire degree program. Five items were loaded on course flexibil-ity, with the lowest loading item at .62 and the other four at .70 or higher. Four items were loaded on program flexibility, with a minimum loading of .51. Coefficient alphas were .87 for course

flexibility and .81 for program flexibility. These factors and their respective loadings are consistent with the findings of previous studies.

I measured interaction with eleven items that assessed learner-interface, learner-learner and learner-instructor interaction (Hill-man et al., 1994; Thach & Murphy, 1995). The factor analysis of these items identified three variables: (1) Instructor emphasis on interaction, which focused on the instructor’s efforts to generate

interaction and the outcomes of those interactions (five items load-ing at .55 or higher, coefficient alpha = .82); (2) ease of interaction,which focused on the lack of difficulty of participating in and fol-lowing class discussions (three items loading at .77 or higher, coeffi-cient alpha = .84); and (3) classroom dynamics (four items loading at .55 or higher, coefficient alpha = .69). These results were consis-tent with those of previous studies using the variables.

I measured student engagement in Internet-based courses by

calculating the amount of time students spent on the course Web-site. I calculated this by multiplying average number of days per week a student spent online by the average number of minutes per online session.

To insure that the relationships between these variables were as direct as possible, I also used gender, student age and the number of Internet-based courses the student had taken prior to partici-pating in this study as control variables.

Results

Table 2 presents the descriptive statistics for the study. Note that perceived learning had the highest mean and the narrowest range of the variables measured using the survey (mean=5.37, S.D.=1.18on a seven-point scale) which suggests that students in the study generally had a fairly high level of perceived learning.

Table 3 presents the results of a hierarchical regression analysis of these variables. The first-step regression model revealed moder-ate relationships between age and perceived learning and gender and perceived learning, suggesting that older students and women may have had stronger learning experiences in the online envi-Business Communication Quarterly 63:4December 2000__________________________________________________________________________18

ronment (see Table 3). However, these effects became non-signifi-cant in the full model. In the full model, the only variables that are significantly associated with learning are the three variables for interaction: instructor emphasis on interaction, ease of interac-tion, and classroom dynamics (see Table 3). Considering that the learner-interface dimension of interaction remained constant since all courses used the same course software, these results sug-gest that instructors play a significant role in enhancing learning in Internet-based courses through their efforts to generate and facilitate interaction.

Discussion

This study tested variables that have been developed in the infor-mation technology and distance education literatures for their association with student learning in Internet-based courses. The two clear findings were that students report relatively high levels of perceived learning, and elements of an interactive teaching style were strongly associated with that learning. These findings

provide support for findings from initial research that suggest that an interactive teaching style may be the best pedagogical approach to Internet-based courses (Arbaugh, 2000a; Harasim, 1990; Leidner & Jarvenpaa, 1995).

Considering how well established the constructs of the TAM and computer usage are in the technology adoption literature, that fact that neither perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use of the technology, nor student engagement of the course Website were associated with student learning is noteworthy. One possible

explanation is that these variables may predict whether an Inter-net-based course was a satisfying experience, but learning comes through other activities such as reading classroom materials, dis-cussion and reflection. Given the significant association of the classroom dynamics factor with learning, technology is only

noticed as a factor if it is perceived as detrimental to the learning experience.

Several limitations make this study’s findings tentative. The first is the sample size. The sample size reflects the emergence of the delivery medium, in that a limited number of courses with rel-atively small enrollments were available to sample (Dumont,1996). As more business schools offer degree programs online,opportunities will increase to conduct studies with samples large enough to detect smaller effect sizes. Other limitations may

impact the generalizability of the study’s findings. Since all the class sections used Lotus LearningSpace course software, the find-ings may not be generalizable to courses using other software

packages. This suggests that similar studies should be conducted using other course software packages. Also, the students in these courses were enrolled in the university’s regular MBA program

and were taking these courses along with courses in physical class-rooms. This may prevent the study’s findings from being applica-ble to programs that are offered completely online and do not

allow students to take courses in both formats. Lastly, since there were no classroom-based control groups, it can’t be said with cer-tainty that these findings are unique to the Internet-based envi-ronment.

Implications and Areas for Future Research

In spite of the study’s limitations, it provides some interesting implications and challenges for a variety of audiences. For

instance, the primary implication for business educators is that teachers matter in the online educational environment. Instruc-tors have from substantial to complete control over ease of inter-action, emphasis on interaction, and classroom dynamics. This suggests that instructors need to develop and cultivate instruc-Internet-based MBA Courses / Arbaugh __________________________________________________________________________21

tional skills such as dividing a class into effective smaller groups of students, developing interesting discussion questions, and fostering intimacy in the online environment. This also could mean that the idea of using online courses as a cost reduction tool for deliv-ering MBA programs may be unfounded.

The fact that perceived ease of use of the course software was not associated with learning suggests that, at least for now, peda-gogical approaches may be more important than the technology in determining the effectiveness of these courses. However, this does-n’t mean that technology issues can be ignored. The instructor’s familiarity and ability to use course software packages and items such as audio, video, and Web links will allow him/her to create a comfortable virtual classroom where students find it easier to

interact because of reduced navigational challenges of the course Websites.

The results of the study also carry implications for researchers.In addition to addressing concerns related to the limitations of

this study, several opportunities emerge for researchers of Internet-based management education to advance theoretical and empiri-cal work. Researchers can build on this study by incorporating additional independent variables. Based on the role that charac-teristics of interaction and learning played in this study, an expan-sion of virtual classroom characteristics could be a good starting point. Educational communication researchers have called for

additional study of the effects of instructor immediacy in Internet-based learning environments (Freitas et al., 1998). The study of instructor immediacy could provide additional insights into the nature of virtual classroom interaction and how instructors may generate it more effectively. Other instructor-based variables could include instructor attitudes toward the course and technology

(Webster & Hackley, 1997), instructor experience, and skill level with the medium.

While the study found that an interactive style was associated with student learning in online courses, much more work on iden-tifying specific effective interactive behaviors needs to be done.More refined measures of activities such as small group formation Business Communication Quarterly 63:4December 2000__________________________________________________________________________22

and selection (Chidambaram, 1996; Warkentin et al., 1997), con-versational style (Ahearn et al., 1992), encouragement of sharing of student experiences, and discussion synthesis (Althaus, 1997)could help refine the behaviors that make these courses attractive and valuable.

Finally, the findings hold several implications for graduate busi-ness education programs. One of the biggest challenges may be acquiring and using resources to operate both physical and online degree programs simultaneously, particularly when initial indica-tions are that the students who take these courses represent differ-ent markets (Greco, 1999). If faculty do matter as much as the findings of this study suggest, then business schools need to make substantial investments in faculty technological and pedagogical development to teach in the virtual environment. However, train-ing faculty to teach effectively in both virtual and classroom envi-ronments, maintaining dedicated equipment and ensuring ade-quate technical support likely will be both time-consuming and expensive. One possible solution to this challenge may be to charge a premium for the flexibility of taking Internet-based

courses. However, such premiums will require MBA programs to know their market well to ensure that they gauge the price elastic-ity of their courses accurately.

This study examined factors that may influence student learning in Internet-based courses and found that pedagogical rather than technological factors were most strongly associated with learning.In the midst of cries that Internet-based technologies could signal the downfall of academic business schools (Moore, 1997), these findings provide grounds for optimism. However, the optimism

must be tempered with the realization that these pedagogical skills must continually improve through personal and professional

investment by both faculties and business schools so that they can continue to survive and thrive in this changing environment.References

Ahearn, T. C., Peck, K., & Laycock, M. (1992). The effects of teacher disclosure

in computer-mediated discusssion. Journal of Educational Computing Research,8,291-309.

Internet-based MBA Courses / Arbaugh __________________________________________________________________________23

Alavi, M. (1994). Computer-mediated collaborative learning: An empirical eval-uation. MIS Quarterly, 18,159-174.

Alavi, M., Yoo, Y., & Vogel, D. R. (1997). Using information technology to add value to management education. Academy of Management Journal, 40(6),1310-1333.

Althaus, S. L. (1997). Computer-mediated communication in the university classroom: An experiment with online discussions. Communication Education,46(3), 158-174.

Arbaugh, J. B. (2000a) Virtual classroom characteristics and student satisfaction in Internet-based MBA courses. Journal of Management Education, 24(1), 32-54.

Arbaugh, J. B. (2000b) Virtual classroom versus physical classroom: An

exploratory comparison of class discussion patterns and student learning in an asynchronous Internet-based MBA course. Journal of Management Education,24(2), 207-227.

Atkinson, M., & Kydd, C. (1997). Individual characteristics associated with World Wide Web use: An empirical study of playfulness and motivation. The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems, 28(2), 53-62.

Bagozzi, R. P ., Davis, F . D., & Warshaw, P . R. (1992). Development and test of a theory of technological learning and usage. Human Relations, 45(7), 659-686.Bailey, E. K., & Koltar, M. (1994). Teaching via the Internet. Communication Education, 43(2), 184-193.

Clarke, R. D. (1999, April). Going the distance. Black Enterprise, 29,113-118.Brandon, D. P ., & Hollingshead, A. B. (1999). Collaborative learning and com-puter-supported groups. Communication Education, 48(2), 109-126.

Chidambaram, L. (1996). Relational development in computer-supported groups. MIS Quarterly, 20(2), 143-163.

Davis, F . (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.

Davis, F . D., Bagozzi, R. P ., & Warshaw, P . R. (1989). User acceptance of com-puter technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Sci-ence, 35(8), 982-1003.

Dede, C. J. (1990). The evolution of distance learning: Technology-mediated interactive learning. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 22(1),247-264.

Dumont, R. A. (1996). Teaching and learning in cyberspace. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 39(4), 192-204.

Dyck, J. L., & Smither, J. A. (1994). Age differences in computer anxiety: The role of computer experience, gender, and education. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 10,239-248.

Ellram, L. M., & Easton, L. (1999). Purchasing education on the Internet. Jour-nal of Supply Chain Management, 35(1), 11-19.Flaherty, L. M., Pearce, K. J., & Rubin, R. R. (1998). Internet and face-to-face

Business Communication Quarterly 63:4December 2000__________________________________________________________________________24

25 Internet-based MBA Courses / Arbaugh

__________________________________________________________________________

Rahm, D., & Reed, B. J. (1997). Going remote: The use of distance learning, the World Wide Web, and the Internet in graduate programs of public affairs and administration. Public Productivity and Management Review, 20(4), 459-471.Ridley, D., & Sammour, H. (1994). Viable alternative means of instructional delivery: Online courses as an alternative teaching method. College Student Journal, 30,337-339.

Russell, T. (1997) The “No Significant Difference” phenomenon. .

Strauss, S. G. (1996). Getting a clue: Communication media and information distribution effects on group process and performance. Small Group Research,27(1), 115-142.

Taylor, J. (1996). The continental classroom: Teaching labor studies on-line. Labor Studies Journal, 21,19-38.

Thach, E. C., & Murphy, K. L. (1995). Competencies for distance education pro-fessionals. Educational Technology Research & Development, 43(1), 57-79.

Walther, J. B. (1992). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective. Communications Research, 19,52-90.

Warkentin, M. E., Sayeed, L., & Hightower, R. (1997). Virtual teams versus face-to-face teams: An exploratory study of a web-based conference system.Decision Sciences, 28(4), 975-996.

Webster, J., & Hackley, P . (1997). Teaching effectiveness in technology-mediated distance learning. Academy of Management Journal, 40(6), 1282-1309.

Whitley, Jr., B.E. (1997). Gender differences in computer-related attitudes and behavior: A meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 13,1-22.

https://www.wendangku.net/doc/a25408471.html,

Address correspondence to the author, University of Wisconsin Oshkosh,College of Business Administration, 800 Algoma Blvd., Oshkosh WI 54901 (e-mail: arbaugh@https://www.wendangku.net/doc/a25408471.html,).Business Communication Quarterly 63:4December 2000__________________________________________________________________________26

Classroom English课堂用语

Classroom English课堂用语 Ⅰ开始上课 Greetings问候 1. T: Hello, everyone! 大家好! S: Hello, Miss White. 你好,怀特小姐。 2. T: Good morning, boys and girls! 孩子们,早上好! S: Good morning, Mrs. Black!布莱克夫人,早上好! 3. T: Good afternoon, kids! 下午好,孩子们! S: Good afternoon, Mr. Red. 雷德先生,下午好。 4. T: Good evening, Class 3! 孩子们,晚上好! S: Good evening, Ms. Green!格林夫人,晚上好! 5. T: How are you today? 你好吗? S: Fine, thank you. And you? 很好,谢谢。你呢? T: I’m fine, too. Thank you.我也很好,谢谢。 6. T: How are things with you? 你好吗? S: Not too bad, thanks. 还不错,谢谢。 7. T: How are things with you? 你好吗? S: Not too bad, thanks. 还不错,谢谢。 8. T: How are you feeling today, Billy? 你好吗, 比利? S: I’m very well, thanks. And you? 很好,谢谢。你呢? 9. T: I hope you are all feeling well. 我希望大家都挺好。 S: Same to you. 10. How are things with you? Did you have a good weekend? 怎么样啊?周末过得好吗? Introducing Yourself 自我介绍 1.T: Let me introduce myself. My name is Ann and I come from America. I’m your new English teacher and I’ll be teaching you/helping you learn English this year. And how about you? Can you introduce yourselves? 首先作个自我介绍。我叫安,从美国来,是你们的新英语教师,今年我将教你们英语。你们呢?请做个自我介绍,好吗? S: I’m Lilly and I’m twelve years old. I am from China and I like English very much. 我叫丽丽,今年十二岁,我从中国来,我非常喜欢英语。 2.T: I’ll just te ll you a bit about myself. My name is Jack Smith and I’m from England. I’m your new English teacher. You can call me Mr. Smith. Can you introduce your neighbour to me? 我先介绍一下自己。我叫史密斯,来自英国,是你们的英语老师。你能介绍一下你的同桌吗? S: Yes. She is Rose and she is eleven years old. She is from Chongqing. 好的。她叫罗丝,今年十一岁,她来自重庆。 Checking Attendance 点名

雅思大作文环境保护图文稿

雅思大作文环境保护集团文件发布号:(9816-UATWW-MWUB-WUNN-INNUL-DQQTY-

环境保护类 一.环境问题 1.气候变化、全球变暖:climate change global warming 2.空气污染、垃圾增多:air pollution increase of rubbish / garbage 3.能源危机、缺水、森林砍伐:energy crisis water shortage deforestation 4.自然灾害、酸雨、沙尘暴、干旱、水灾: natural disasters acid rain stand storm drought flood 二.原因(根本) 人口增长工业发展人类活动Population growth industrial development long-term human activities 三.方法 1.世界方面: 全球合作达成共识制定环境保护国际准 Global cooperation reach agreement set international standard s for 2.政府方面: 环保政策鼓励低碳经济发展

Work out / make / enact environmental policy encourage low carbon economy 3.企业方面: 推出环保产品引领大众绿色消费习惯 Promote environmental products / production lead green consuming habits Environmental-friendly 4.个人: 提升环保意识倡导低碳生活方式Improve public’s green awareness encourage / advocate low carbon life style Raise Arouse Increase 5.科技: 开发可再生清洁能源投资开发节能科技 Exploit renewable clean energy invest in energy-saving technologies 你认为环保一定是政府或企业的责任吗? 范文

雅思7分大作文范文批改和解析

雅思7分大作文范文批改和解析 距离雅思写作7分你大概还有3个步骤要走,是的,不是谁都可以轻轻松松活动雅思高分的。今天给大家带来了雅思7分大作范文批改和解析,希望能够帮助到大家,一起来学习吧。 雅思7分大作范文批改和解析 雅思写作提高第一步:结构(5.0 - 5.5) 问题:出国留学的优点(the advantages of disadvantages of study abroad) 同学:One reason for those who decide to go overseas to get a higher degree is that they believe they can get better education in certain fields. That is to say, different universities in different countries have their specialized courses and rich resources can be provided according to their needs and requirements. Another reason is that they can learn a foreign language in a more efficient way. There is no denying that living in an all-round English environment and being affected by local culture make people quick learners. 解析:出国留学和高学历完全是两回事(出去读初中和高中都算出国);出国就是better education,在国内就不是better? 出

雅思大作文环境保护

环境保护类 一.环境问题 1.气候变化、全球变暖:climate change global warming 2.空气污染、垃圾增多:air pollution increase of rubbish / garbage 3.能源危机、缺水、森林砍伐:energy crisis water shortage deforestation 4.自然灾害、酸雨、沙尘暴、干旱、水灾: natural disasters acid rain stand storm drought flood 二.原因(根本) 人口增长工业发展人类活动 Population growth industrial development long-term human activities 三.方法 1.世界方面: 全球合作达成共识制定环境保护国际准Global cooperation reach agreement set international standard s for 2.政府方面: 环保政策鼓励低碳经济发展 Work out / make / enact environmental policy encourage low carbon economy 3.企业方面: 推出环保产品引领大众绿色 消费习惯 Promote environmental products / production lead green consuming habits Environmental-friendly 4.个人: 提升环保意识倡导低碳生活方式 Improve public’s green awareness encourage / advocate low carbon life style Raise Arouse Increase 5.科技: 开发可再生清洁能源投资开发节能科技 Exploit renewable clean energy invest in energy-saving technologies 你认为环保一定是政府或企业的责任吗? 范文 第一段:(背景句)environmental protection is one of the most important challenges almost every countries is facing . (复合句) 六种:宾从、定从..... however ,whether only government and big firms have resources and powers to preserve our environment is a controversial issue .

雅思写作7分官方评分标准解析

Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? Foreign languages have increasingly gained popularity among students these years, given that the world is shrinking and each country now has a more frequent contact with the outside world. Many people[c1]argue that children should begin learning a foreign language at elementary school, instead of waiting until [c2] they enter secondary school. There are several reasons for this. Firstly, despite the fact that parents do not want to put too much pressure on their children, they also do not want them to lose at the starting line. This means, if the kids start to learn a foreign language early, their parents are relieved from the thought that their kids will have to catch up later on, which is true to some extent. On the other hand, it is scientifically proved that children tend to learn a language faster before the age of 12. As far as I know, my friends who started to learn English when they were six or seven now have a much more satisfactory English level than those who started at12 or 13. So it is wise to have foreign language course in primary school curriculum. Additionally, learning a foreign language at an earlier age can lay children a solid foundation for future studying.Rather than just learning a language itself, children learn a lot more about the learning methods. As a result, when they enter secondary school, they can explore more languages and enrich their knowledge by extensive readings.

Classroom English 100小学英语课堂

Classroom English 100小学英语课堂 用语100句(1) 1.上课(Beginning a class) (1) Let's start now. / Let's begin our class / lesson . (2) Stand up, please. (3) Sit down, please. 2.问候(Greeting) (4) Hello, boys and girls / children . (5) Good morning, class / everyone / everybody / children / boys andgirls. (6) Good afternoon, class / everyone / everybody / children / boys andgirls. (7) How are you today 3.考勤(Checking attendance) (8) Who's on duty today / Who's helping this morning / today (9) Is everyone / everybody here / present (10) Is anyone away / Is anybody away (11) Is anyone absent / Is anybody absent (12) Who's absent / Who's away (13) Where is he / she (14) Try to be on time. / Don't be late next time. 1/15 (15) Go back to your seat, please.

保护环境的英语作文10篇完整版

《保护环境的英语作文》 保护环境的英语作文(一): Now, our side of the car constant more up, the environment also increasingly worse! That the air around us there are many harmful substances。 Therefore, we want to Sue around things start to do。 For example, we can go to school by bike or walk, it can exercise。 If you have time can use less elevator, many climb stairs。 We can not only physical exercise, but also to protect our environment。 此刻,我们身边的汽车不断的多了起来,环境也越来越糟糕!以至于我们周围的空气有很多有害物质。所以,我们要苏身边的小事做起。比如,我们能够骑自行车上学或者步行,这样还能够锻炼身体。有时光的话能够少用电梯,多爬楼梯。我们不仅仅能锻炼身体,也能保护我们的环境。 保护环境的英语作文(二): There are still many problems of environmental protection in recent years。 One of the most serious problems is the serious pollution of air,water and soil。 the polluted air does great harm to peoples health。 The polluted water causes diseases and death。 What is more, vegetation had been greatly reduced with the rapid growth of modern cities。 To protect the environment, governments of many countries have done a lot。 Legislative steps have been introduced to control air pollution,to protect the forest and sea resources and to stop any environmental pollution。 Therefore, governments are playing the most important role in the environmental protection today。 In my opinion, to protect environment, the government must take even more concrete measures。 First, it should let people fully realize the importance of environmental protection through education。 Second, much more efforts should be made to put the population planning policy into practice, because more people means more people means more pollution。Finally,those who destroy the environment intentionally should be severely punished。 We should let them know that destroying environment means destroying mankind themselves。 保护环境 目前环保还存在着许多问题。最严重的问题就是空气、水和土壤的严重污染。污染的空气对人类的健康十分有害。污染的水引起疼病,造成死亡。更有甚者,随着现代社会的迅速扩建,植被大大的减少。

英语课堂教学用语(Classroom English)

英语课堂教学用语(Classroom English) 1. Beginning class 开始上课 l Stand up, please. 起立! l Sit down, please. 请坐下! l Let’s start now. / Let’s begin our class / lesson.让我们开始上课。 l Let’s get ready for class. 准备上课。 l Have you got everything ready for class? 你(们)做好上课的准备了吗? 2. Greetings 问候 l Hello, boys and girls / children. 同学们好! l Good morning / afternoon, class / everyone / boys and girls. 早上好/ 下午好,同学们。 l How are you today? 你(们)今天好吗? 3. Checking attendance 考勤 l Is everyone / everybody here / present? 所有人都到齐了吗? l Who’s absent / away? 谁缺席了? l Why is he / she absent today? 他/ 她为什么缺席? l Try to be on time. / Don’t be late next time. 下次别迟到。 4. Asking the student on duty 向值日生提问 l Who’s on duty today? Who’s helping this morning / today? 今天(早上)谁值日? l Could you clean the blackboard, please? 请你擦一下黑板,好吗? l What’s the date today? 今天是几号? l What day is it today? 今天星期几? 5. Reviewing the lesson 复习功课 l Let’s review our lessons. 让我们开始复习。 l What did we learn last lesson? 上一课我们学了什么? l Who can tell me what we learnt today? 谁能告诉我,今天我们都学了些什么? l What did you learn today? 今天你们学了些什么?不断更新中,Welcome back!

环境类--雅思范文Environmental-problems

环境类--雅思范文 1. Environmental problems are too big for individual countries and individual people to address. We have reached the stage where the only way to protect the environment is to address it at an international level. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Nowadays, environmental problem has been the focus of a debate. Among these related problems, the issue of international efforts in combating environmental pollution is an extremely acute one. It is firmly believed that the benefits of large scale groups have remarkable impact on our society, especially on environment and animals aspects. First and foremost, environmental pollution is a problem that beyond national borders. This is because the destructive effects that it brought cannot be solved without the co-operation of all the countries in the world. A case in point is the occurrence of extreme weather condition, like La Nina in terms of heavy flood and drought; in addition to, global warming, acid rain that happen in many parts of the world. Due to its chronic and perpetual environment effect, it is necessary for the countries on the earth to form an association and join hands to protect our land from further environment deterioration. Another reason is that it is urgent to set up international alliance to prevent the shrinking space of animals' habitat. It is due to the fact that, local ecosystem has gradually been destroyed all over the world. For instance, Mountain Gorilla has loss its natural habitat to human beings, for being continually developing housing estate deep into the forest. Thus, the breaking down of ecosystem has pushed species closer to the brink of extinction. Hence, it is cleared that the prevention of declining the numbers of rare animals need the joint efforts from many administrative agencies in the world. In conclusion, I totally agree with the idea that international collaboration and cooperation in tackling environmental pollution is positively affects the sustainable development on earth. It is expected that environmental preservation can be greatly enhanced through cultivating environmental awareness around the people in every countries in the foreseeable future.

2016.12.17雅思真题大作文7分范文

Task:Some people think getting old is entirely bad. However, others think that life of the elderly in modern world is much easier than in the past. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 思路解析: 2016年雅思收官之战的作文来了一道新题,问当今社会老年人的生活是不是很 糟糕?说是新题,因为本题以前从未原题出现过,但关于年龄的话题却不缺少。 比如2010年7月10日“年轻人是否适合担任政府要职”,2012年3月10日“老 龄化现象的原因及解决方法”,2012年3月31日“年轻人和老年人谁的价值更 高?”,2013年6月8日“政府是否应该对老年人养老提供财政支持?”,2015 年1月1日“年轻人当领导,行不行?”,2015年4月11日“老年人与年轻人 争夺工作职位,怎么办?”等等。 本题需要论证的对立观点是:年老很糟糕 vs. 当今社会年老没有那么糟糕。那 么,变老有哪些坏处呢?首先,当然是身体条件没有以前好了,甚至可能出现多 种疾病(物质层面);其次,不工作了,与人的联系少了,心里可能会感觉孤单, 甚至感觉没有价值了(精神层面);最后,变老后对社会的依赖程度更高,给社会 增加了压力(社会层面)。那么,这些问题在当今社会是不是得到了解决呢?首先, 医疗条件的改善有助于保持老年人的身体状况;互联网的出现有助于缓解老年人 的心理孤单问题;物质水平的提高也降低了老年人给社会造成的压力。如此观之, 现代社会老年人的生活的确容易多了,但我的观点是:外部条件只是改善老年人 生活的一个方面,最重要的还是老年人自己要积极调整心态,努力适应退休后的 生活,从而过一个更幸福更祥和的晚年。 Sample answer: Getting old is a natural process that nobody really likes. When you reach a certain age, your physical conditions will inevitably deteriorate, and you may suffer from various kinds of diseases. When you retire, you will feel isolated because your previous work contacts may be all gone, then you may feel useless to the world. Furthermore, when you get too old, you’ ll have to rely heavily on the support from others, either physically or emotionally, and your life will become a great pressure to your family and the whole society as well. For all these bad things about getting old, many people argue that the life of the elderly today is much easier than in the past. In the first place, medical advances nowadays have made it possible for the old people to stay sound and healthy for quite a long while even after they retire. Diseases such as diabetes, hypertension and heart attack which might have

英语作文范文-雅思写作高分范文:环境保护

英语作文范文 雅思写作高分范文:环境保护 Environmental hazards are often too great for particular countries or individuals to tackle. We have arrived at a point in time where the only way to lessen environmental problems is at an international level. Environmental problems have reached such proportions that people feel international organizations must be set up to intervene in world affairs to resolve these problems. Whether this will resolve the problem is very unlikely as international organizations are just an extension of human behavior. That is, if human conflicts cannot be resolved at home, then they are unlikely to be resolved at the international level. Nevertheless, international organizations do attract attention to the growing problem of aims of the international community to resolve the issue of environmental pollution and support their cause, I do not believe it is the best or only way to protect the environment; in fact, it is only a small part of what is needed in a global initiative.

雅思小作文7分万能模板整合

雅思小作文7分万能模板整合 在这一雅思备考阶段,不知道雅思小作文如何观察图表,如何对比构思,尤其是一些涉及数据表达句式,可以借用雅思小作文万能模板进行练习仿写。。下面就和大家分享,来欣赏一下吧。 雅思小作文7分万能模板 1go up and down/ wave/ fluctuate/ beunstable/ be in flexible 起伏不定 2 The first point tonote is the huge increase in the number of 需要注意的第一点就是…的急剧增长 3 The statistics show that这些数据表明 4Form/comprise/make up/constitute/ account for….percent占百分之几 5 This cure graph describes the trendof该曲线图描述了…的 趋势 6 The statistics lead us to theconclusion that由这些数据,我们可以做出如下结论 7 As can be seen from the line graph, 由线状图我们可以看出

8增加:Increase / raise / rise / go up/ soar/ascend/ mount/ climb 9减少:Decrease / grow down / drop / fall/ reduce/descend/ shrink to/decline 10稳定:Remain stable / stabilize / level off/ remainunchanged 雅思小作文7分万能模板 1 It can be seen from the table that 由表格我们可以看出 2 The table shows the changes in thenumber of… over theperiod from…to… 该表格展示了从…到…数据的变化 3 The table provides some data of 该表格提供了有关…的数据 4 As can be seen clearly from thetable, 从表格中我们可以清楚地看出, 5 As can be seen from the table,great changes have taken place in...

ClassroomEnglishforteachers

Classroom English for teachers Beginning a class ( 开始上课) 1. Let's start class. =It's time for class. =Class begins. 上课 Let’s get ready for class.准备上课。 2. Hello, boys and girls / children. 同学们好 3. Good morning /afternoon, boys and girls / teacher. 同学们/老师们,早晨好/下午好 4. Stand up / Sit down, please. 起立/请坐。 5. Who is on duty today? 今天谁值日? 6. Is everyone / everybody here /present? 大家都出席了吗? 7. Is anyone anybody absent? 有人缺席吗? 8. W ho’s absent? 谁没来? 9. Let's begin our class. 咱们上课吧. 10. We'll start / begin a new lesson today.今天我们讲学习新课. 11. What day is it today? 今天星期几? 12. What's the weather like today? 今天的天气怎么样? In Class ( 课堂上) 13 . Let’s begin a new lesson. 我们开始学新课. 14. We'll learn something new. 我们学新知识. 15. Let's learn some new words/ phrases/ sentences. 咱们学些新单词/句子。 16. Let's review what we learned yesterday. 咱们复习一下昨天学过的内容. 17. Ready? Are you ready? 准备好了吗? 18. Start. 开始 19. All together. 大家一起来. 20. Read all together now.大家一起读. 21. Sit down, please. 请坐端正. 22. Stop talking. /Don't talk. 不许说话. 23. Be quiet, please. = No more talking, please. 请安静. 24. Look at my mouth, please. 请看我的口型。 25. Quickly, /be quick, please. 请迅速点。 26. Hurry. /Hurry up, please. = Please a little faster. 请快点。 27. Can you follow me 听懂了吗? 28. Is that understood? 能听懂吗? 29. Is that clear?听清楚了吗? 30. Repeat after me/Follow me. 跟我读。 31. Please listen to me. 请注意听我说。 32. Please listen to the tape recorder/ to the recording. 请听录音。 33. Listen carefully, please. 请仔细听。 34. Attention, please. 请注意。 35. Please look at the blackboard/picture/ slide. 请看黑板/幻灯片。 36. Please answer my questions. 请回答我的问题。 37. Can you spell the word....? 你能拼读这个单词吗?

保护环境的英语作文10篇

保护环境的英语作文10篇 保护环境的英语作文保护环境的英语作文(一): Now , oursideofthecarconstantmoreup , theenvironmentalsoincreasinglyworse!Thattheairaroun dustherearemanyharmfulsubstances 。Therefore , wewanttoSuearoundthingsstarttodo。Forexa mple, weca n gotoscho ol bybikeo rwa lk, itc anex ercis e。Ify ouha vetime can useless el evator, m a nyclimbst airs we can noton lyphy sicalexer c ise, buta Is otoprot ect ourenv iron ment o 此刻,我们身边的汽车不断的多了起来,环境也越来越糟糕!以至于我们周围的空气有很多有害物质。所以,我们要苏身边的小事做起。比如,我们能够骑自行车上学或者步行,这样还能够锻炼身体。有时光的话能够少用电梯,多爬楼梯。我们不仅仅能锻炼身体,也能保护我们的环境。 保护环境的英语作文(二): Th erearesti 1 lmanypro bl emsofen vir onment alpr otect o neofthe mo stseriou s problemsi stheseriou ionin rece ntyear s o spollution ofair, wat e randsoil。t hepollu ted airdoe sgre athar mtope ople,sheal th。Thepoll ut edwaterc a usesdisea sesanddeat h。whatismo re, vegeta, t ionhadbe en greatly red ucedwi thth erapi dgrow thof modern cit ies。 T o protectth eenvironme nt, governm entsofman y countrie

相关文档
相关文档 最新文档