文档库 最新最全的文档下载
当前位置:文档库 › 考研英语一历年真题及答案.doc

考研英语一历年真题及答案.doc

考研英语一历年真题及答案.doc
考研英语一历年真题及答案.doc

考研英语一历年真题及答案【篇一:2015 年考研英语一真题及答案详细解析】

ass=txt>2015 年全国硕士研究生入学统一考试英语(一)试题

及答案详细解析

section i use of english :

directions: read the following text. choose the best word(s) for

each numbered blank and mark a, b,c or d on the answer sheet.

(10 points)

though not biologically related, friends are as ―related ‖as fourth cousins, sharing about 1% of genes. that is _(1)_a study,

published from the university of california and yale university

in the proceedings of the national academy of sciences,

has__(2)_.

the study is a genome-wide analysis conducted _(3)__1,932

unique subjects which __(4)__pairs of uelated friends and

uelated strangers. the same people were used in both_(5)_.

while 1% may seem_(6)_,it is not so to a geneticist. as james

fowler, professor of medical genetics at uc san diego,

says, ―most people do not even _(7)_their fourth cousins but

somehow manage to select as friends the people who_(8)_our

kin. ‖

the study_(9)_found that the genes for smell were something

shared in friends but not genes for immunity .why this

similarity exists in smell genes is difficult to explain, for

now,_(10)_,as the team suggests, it draws us to similar

environments but there is more_(11)_it. there could be many

mechanisms working together that _(12)_us in choosing

genetically similar friends_(13)_ ‖functional kinship ‖of being friends with_(14)_!

one of the remarkable findings of the study was the similar

genes seem to be evolution_(15)_than other genes studying

this could help_(16)_why human evolution picked pace in the

last 30,000 years, with social environment being a

major_(17)_factor.

the findings do not simply explain people ‘s_(18)_to befriend

those of similar_(19)_backgrounds, say the researchers.

though all the subjects were drawn from a population of

european extraction, care was taken to_(20)_that all subjects,

friends and strangers, were taken from the same population.

1. [a] when [b] why [c] how [d] what

2. [a] defended [b] concluded [c] withdrawn [d] advised

3. [a] for [b] with [c] on [d] by

4. [a] compared [b] sought [c] separated [d] connected

5. [a] tests [b] objects [c]samples [d] examples

6. [a] insignificant [b] unexpected [c]unbelievable [d]

incredible

7. [a] visit [b] miss [c] seek [d] know

8. [a] resemble [b] influence [c] favor [d] surpass

9. [a] again [b] also [c] instead [d] thus

10. [a] meanwhile [b] furthermore [c] likewise [d] perhaps

11. [a] about [b] to [c]from [d]like

12. [a] drive [b] observe [c] confuse [d]limit 13. [a] according

to [b] rather than [c] regardless of [d] along with 14. [a]

chances [b]responses [c]missions [d]benefits 15. [a] later

[b]slower [c] faster [d] earlier 16. [a]forecast [b]remember

[c]understand [d]express 17. [a] unpredictable [b]contributory

[c] controllable [d] disruptive 18. [a] endeavor [b]decision

[c]arrangement [d] tendency 19. [a] political [b] religious [c]

ethnic [d] economic

20. [a] see [b] show [c] prove [d] tell

section ii reading comprehension part a

directions:

read the following four texts. answer the questions below

each text by choosing a, b,

c or d. mark your answers on answer sheet. (40 points)

text 1

king juan carlos of spain once insisted ―kings don ‘t abdicate,

they dare in their sleep. ‖but e mb a r a n sg s s i candals and the

popularity of the republican left in the recent euro-elections

have forced him to eat his words and stand down. so, does the

spanish crisis suggest that monarchy is seeing its last days?

does that mean the writing is on the wall for all european royals, with their magnificent uniforms and majestic lifestyle? the spanish case provides arguments both for and against

monarchy. when public opinion is particularly polarised, as it

was following the end of the franco regime, monarchs can rise

above ―mere‖politics and ―embody‖ a spirit of national unity.

it is this apparent transcendence of politics that explains

monarchs ‘continuing popularity polarized. and also, the

middle east excepted, europe is the most monarch-infested

region in the world, with 10 kingdoms (not counting vatican

city and andorra). but unlike their absolutist counterparts in

the gulf and asia, most royal families have survived because

they allow voters to avoid the difficult search for a non-

controversial but respected public figure.

even so, kings and queens undoubtedly have a downside.

symbolic of national unity as they claim to be, their very

history —and sometimes the way they behave today –

embodies outdated and indefensible privileges and

inequalities. at a time when thomas piketty and other

economists are warning of rising inequality and the increasing

power of inherited wealth, it is bizarre that wealthy aristocratic

families should still be the symbolic heart of modern

democratic states.

the most successful monarchies strive to abandon or hide

their old aristocratic ways. princes and princesses have day-

jobs and ride bicycles, not horses (or helicopters). even so,

these are wealthy families who party with the international 1%,

and media intrusiveness makes it increasingly difficult to

maintain the right image.

while europe ‘s monarchies will no doubt be smart enough to

survive for some time to come, it is the british royals who have

most to fear from the spanish example.

it is only the queen who has preserved the m onarchy ‘s reputation with her rather ordinary (if well-heeled) granny style. the danger will come

with charles, who has both an expensive taste of lifestyle and a

pretty hierarchical view of the world. he has failed to

understand that monarchies have largely survived because

they provide a service –as non-controversial and non-political

heads of state. charles ought to know that as english history

shows, it is kings, not republicans, who are the monarchy ‘s worst enemies.

21. according to the first two paragraphs, king juan carlos of

spain

[a] used turn enjoy high public support

[b] was unpopular among european royals [c] cased his

relationship with his rivals [d]ended his reign in embarrassment

22. monarchs are kept as heads of state in europe mostly

[a] owing to their undoubted and respectable status

[b] to achieve a balance between tradition and reality

[c] to give voter more public figures to look up to

[d]due to their everlasting political embodiment

23. which of the following is shown to be odd, according to

paragraph 4?

[a] aristocrats ‘excessive reliance on inherited wealth

[b] the role of the nobility in modern democracies

[c] the simple lifestyle of the aristocratic families [d]the nobility ‘a ds h erence to their

privileges

24. the british royals ―have most to fear ‖because charles [a] takes a rough line on political issues [b] fails to change his lifestyle as advised [c] takes republicans as his potential allies [d] fails to adapt himself to his future role

25. which of the following is the best title of the text?

[a] carlos, glory and disgrace combined

[b] charles, anxious to succeed to the throne

[c] carlos, a lesson for all european monarchs

[d]charles, slow to react to the coming threats

text 2

just how much does the constitution protect your digital data?

the supreme court will now consider whether police can

search the contents of a mobile phone without a warrant if the

phone is on or around a person during an arrest.

california has asked the justices to refrain from a sweeping

ruling particularly one that upsets the old assumption that

authorities may search through the possessions of suspects at

the time of their arrest. it is hard, the state argues, for judges

to assess the implications of new and rapidly changing

technologies.

the court would be recklessly modest if it followed california ‘s

advice. enough of the implications are discernable, even

obvious, so that the justices can and should provide updated

guidelines to police, lawyers and defendants.

they should start by discarding california ‘s lame argument that exploring the contents

of a smart phone — a vast storehouse of digital information —is similar to, say, rifling through a suspect urse. ‘t h es c pourt

has ruled that police don ‘t violate the fourth amendment when they sift through the wallet or pocketbook of an arrestee

without a warrant. but exploring one ‘s smart phone is more like entering his or her home. a smart phone may contain an

arrestee ‘s reading history, financial history, medical history

and comprehensive records of recent correspondence. the development of ―cloud computing, ‖meanwhile, has made that exploration so much the easier.

as so often is the case, stating that principl e doesn ‘t ease the challenge of line-drawing. in many cases, it would not be

overly onerous for authorities to obtain a warrant to search

through phone contents. they could still invalidate fourth

amendment protections when facing severe, urgent

circumstances, and they could take reasonable measures to

ensure that phone data are not erased or altered while a

warrant is pending. the court, though, may want to allow room

for police to cite situations where they are entitled to more

freedom.

but the justices should not swallow california ‘s argument whole. new, disruptive technology sometimes demands novel applications of the constitution ‘s protections. orin kerr, a law professor, compares the explosion and accessibility of digital

information in the 21st century with the establishment of

automobile use as a virtual necessity of life in the 20th: the

justices had to specify novel rules for the new personal

domain of the passenger car then; they must sort out how the

fourth amendment applies to digital information now.

26. the supreme court will work out whether, during an arrest,

it is legitimate to

[a] prevent suspects from deleting their phone contents.

[b] search for suspects ‘mobile phones without a warrant.

[c] check suspects ‘phone contents without bein g authorized.

[d]prohibit suspects from using their mobile phones.

27. the author ‘s attitude toward california ‘s argument is one of

[a] disapproval. [b] indifference.

[c] tolerance.

[d]cautiousness.

28. the author believes that exploring one ‘s p h c o o n n e t e n t s is comparable to

[a] getting into one ‘s residence. [b] handling one

‘s historical records. [c] scanning one ‘s correspondences.

[d] going through one ‘s wallet.

29. in paragraph 5 and 6, the author shows his concern that

[a] principles are hard to be clearly expressed. [b] the court is giving police less room for action.

[c] citizens ‘privacy is not effectively protected. [d] phones are used to

store sensitive information.

30. orin kerr ‘s comparison is quoted to indic ate that [a] the constitution should be implemented flexibly.

[b] new technology requires reinterpretation of the constitution.

[c]california ‘s argument violates principles of the constitution.

[d]principles of the constitution should never be altered

text 3

the journal science is adding an extra round of statistical

checks to its peer-review process, editor-in-chief marcia

mcnutt announced today. the policy follows similar efforts

from other journals, after widespread concern that basic

mistakes in data analysis are contributing to the irreproducibility of many published research findings.

―readers must have confidence in the conclusions published

in our journal, ‖writes mcnutt in an editorial. working with the

american statistical association, the journal has appointed

seven experts to a statistics board of reviewing editors(sbore).

manuscript will be flagged up for additional scrutiny by the

journal ‘s internal editors, or by its existing board of reviewing

editors or by outside peer reviewers. the sbore panel will then

find external statisticians to review these manuscripts.

asked whether any particular papers had impelled the change,

mcnutt said: ―the creation of the ?statistics board ‘was motivated by concerns broadly with the application of statistics and data analysis in scientific research and is part of

science ‘s overall drive to increase reproducibility in the

research we publish. ‖

相关文档