2011协同创新中心绩效及其影响因素分析
湖南农业大学学报(社会科学版) 2019年4月 第20卷第2期
Journal of Hunan Agricultural University (Social Sciences), Apr. 2019, 20(2):084–090
DOI: 10.13331/https://www.wendangku.net/doc/e39218647.html,ki.jhau(ss).2019.02.012
“2011协同创新中心”绩效及其影响因素分析
刘天佐1，张顺衡2
（湖南农业大学公共管理与法学学院，湖南长沙 410128）
摘 要：基于DEA-Topit模型对H省立项资助的35个“2011协同创新中心”绩效（投入产出效率）及其影响因素进行了实证研究，结果表明：15个协同创新中心投入产出高有效、3个弱有效、17个低（无）效率，显示H 省立项的35个项目整体绩效水平不高，且各学科间绩效差异较大。学科排名、高校所在地域、高校层级分类以及项目所属学科类型与“2011协同创新中心”绩效存在正相关性；学位点数量与“2011协同创新中心”绩效呈显著负相关性。政府在推进协同创新过程中，应尽量打破项目遴选校际间平衡的思维，充分发挥平台优势，提升各协同高校的共享共建水平；着力提升学位点竞争实力，提高人才培养质量；实施分类评价与指导，健全项目持续支持与淘汰机制。
关 键 词：2011协同创新中心；绩效；影响因素
中图分类号：F812.5 文献标志码：A 文章编号：1009–2013(2019)02–0084–07
Performance and influencing factors of the of 2011 Collaborative Innovation Center
LIU Tianzuo, ZHANG Shunheng
(Shcool of Public Administration and Law, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China)
Abstract: Based on DEA-Topit model, this paper empirically studies the performance (input-output efficiency) and its influencing factors of 35 “2011 Collaborative Innovation Centers” funded by H province. The results show that the input-output efficiency of 15 Collaborative Innovation Centers is high, 3 weak and 17 low (no) efficiency. It shows that the overall performance level of 35 projects funded by H province is not high, and the performance differences among disciplines are large. Discipline ranking, university location, university level classification and project subject type are positively correlated with the performance of “2011 Collaborative Innovation Center”. The number of degree points is negatively correlated with the performance of “2011 Collaborative Innovation Center”. In the process of promoting collaborative innovation, the government should try its best to break the balanced thought among the universities in project selection, give full play to the advantages of the platform, and enhance the level of sharing and co-construction among the collaborative universities; focus on enhancing the competitiveness of degree points and improving the quality of personnel training; implement classified evaluation and guidance, and improve the mechanism of sustained project support and elimination.
Keywords: 2011 Collaborative Innovation Center; performance; influencing factors
一、问题的提出
2012年，教育部、财政部联合印发《高等学校创新能力提升计划》，正式启动实施国家层面的
收稿日期：2019－03－20
基金项目：湖南省哲学社会科学规划课题 (16JD03)；湖南省教育科学规划课题 (16YBA194)
作者简介：刘天佐(1964—)，男，湖南衡阳人，博士，教授，研究方向为教育财政与公共项目绩效评价。“2011协同创新计划”（简称“2011计划”）。随着国家层面14个协同创新中心的成功认定，H省在2013—2015年分三批立项资助了35个“2011协同创新中心”建设项目。从项目属性与管理要求上，“2011计划”作为继“985工程”、“211工程”之后又一体现国家战略意志的公共项目，主要以人才、学科、科研三位一体创新能力提升为核心任务，增强创新要素的有效集成，强化高校创新能力发展的导向性，提高投入与产出的效益。无论是项目建