澳大利亚既有建筑绿色建筑评价NABERS ANNUAL REPORT 2012-13

NABERS ANNUAL REPORT 2012-13

Tom Grosskopf

Director – Metro Branch

Regional Operations

Office of Environment and Heritage

NABERS National Administrator

Dear Stakeholders

Over the last 15 years, the National Australian Built Environment Rating System (NA BERS) has grown to become one of Australia’s most successful building efficiency programs. The trusted and reliable NABERS benchmarks of building environmental performance are now a routine feature of government policies, industry programs and commercial property agreements, and mandatory NABERS Energy for offices ratings are now even required by Commonwealth legislation. By taking complex information about the operational efficiency of a building and translating it into a simple six-star rating scale, NABERS has transformed the way we understand and talk about the environmental impact of commercial buildings.

The NABERS program continues to be highly valued by the commercial property market. Buildings with better ratings attract higher investment and rental returns and have lower vacancy rates and outgoings. Importantly, competition for these ratings has delivered clear environmental benefits by stimulating significant investment in energy and water efficiency. Re-rated buildings are now demonstrating annual savings of 380,000 tonnes of greenhouse gas, 440,000 megawatt hours of electricity and 1.6 million litres of water.

This financial year the NABERS program has celebrated some important milestones. With the help of our industry partners, we introduced the new NABERS Energy for data centres rating, which will be central to efforts to help one of the fastest growing energy usage sectors to measure and improve their efficiency. We crossed the Tasman with the ground-breaking launch of NABERS Energy for offices in New Zealand. We also witnessed unparalleled growth in NABERS Energy for offices ratings here in Australia and nearly three quarters of our national office space has now been rated. Our NABERS Assessors are rating over 420,000 square metres of commercial office space, shopping centres and hotels every week.

The success of NABERS rests on a foundation of industry collaboration and a whole of government commitment to delivering public value across jurisdictional boundaries. We have recently released our five year strategic plan for working together even more effectively to provide high quality rating tools that drive innovation in the marketplace and deliver real and measurable environmental benefit. The future for NABERS is bright.

I would like to thank all of our program partners for their support this year, and we look forward to continuing our work together and celebrating our shared achievements.

Our Purpose

The National Australian Building Environmental Rating System (NABERS) measures and rates the environmental performance of commercial offices, shopping centres, hotels and data centres from operational data.

NABERS is a simple six star rating scale that helps the market to overcome information barriers to investing in energy efficiency, water efficiency, waste reduction and indoor environment improvements.

The NABERS program is delivered by industry to commercial property owners and is administered by government. By creating high quality rating tools and working with strategic partners to promote target setting, we aim to create a more sustainable built environment by stimulating the market for environmental retrofits and driving competition between building owners and managers for improved ratings and better performance.

V ISION

Our Vision is to support a more sustainable built environment through a relevant, reliable and practical measure of building performance.

O BJECTIVES

Environmental benefit

NABERS rating tools cover key markets that have an identified environmental need.

Engagement

NABERS is a government-run program that works with in collaboration with industry and other government bodies.

Service delivery

NABERS is efficient, effective and delivers high quality rating tools and services to assessors and customers.

Innovation

NABERS is responsive to new developments and supports market innovation. Accountability

NABERS is transparent and managed under the direction of a representative governing body.

Who we are

T HE NABERS TEAM

The NABERS program is delivered nationally by the NSW Office of Environment and Heritage under the guidance of Commonwealth, State and Territory governments. The full NABERS team is an extensive group of government and industry professionals working together to develop, direct and deliver NABERS ratings to market.

15 NSW Office of Environment and Heritage staff.

The NSW Office of Environment and Heritage is the National Administrator of the NABERS Program. The team develops, maintains and updates rating tools and builds capacity in the market to deliver NABERS ratings by accrediting assessors, providing technical support and running quality assurance auditing processes.

726 NABERS Accredited Assessors.

Assessors are industry experts who have passed a rigorous training, examination and supervision program to become accredited to perform NABERS ratings. Assessors engage with building owners, go to site, collect the requisite information and analyse it to ensure that it complies with a detailed set of rules.

8 Auditors

NABERS Auditors are highly experienced experts who deliver our audit program and provide technical advice to the National Administrator.

12 Trainers

NABERS Trainers deliver NABERS Introductory courses and Assessor training to the market.

14 Supervisors

NABERS Supervisors provide guidance and support for trainee Assessors in delivering their first two ratings.

13 National Steering Committee Members.

The NABERS National Steering Committee is a committee of representatives from Commonwealth, State and Territory governments and non-voting industry observers. The National Steering Committee is the primary decision making body that provides the overall strategic and operational direction for the program.

17 Stakeholder Advisory Committee Members

The NABERS Stakeholder Advisory Committee (SAC) is the peak advisory body to the NABERS program. The SAC provides a valuable national forum for industry to have input into the development and ongoing management of the NABERS suite of rating tools.

Assessor location

NSW 288

VIC 156

QLD 105

SA 35

NT 9

WA 73

TAS 12

ACT 51

4210 The number of years of combined NABERS experience between our Assessors

NATIONAL STEERING COMMITTEE MEMBERS

Chair - Australian Government Department of Industry

Secretariat - Australian Government Department of Industry

National Administrator -NSW Office of Environment and Heritage

Committee Members

VIC - Sustainability Victoria

SA - Department of Planning, Transport and Infrastructure

WA - Public Utilities Office

NT - Department of Planning and Infrastructure

ACT - Planning and Land Authority

TAS - Department of Industry, Energy and Resources*

QLD - Department of Housing and Public Works*

Industry Observers

Australian Institute of Refrigeration Air-conditioning and Heating (AIRAH) Australian Sustainable Built Environment Council (ASBEC)

*Non-paying committee members

S TAKEHOLDER A DVISORY C OMMITTEE M EMBERS

Australian Sustainable Built Environment Council (ASBEC)

The Australian Sustainable Built Environment Council (ASBEC) is a peak body of key organisations committed to creating a sustainable built environment in Australia. Tom Roper, the President of ASBEC is the Chair of the NABERS Stakeholder Advisory Committee.

ASBEC’s membership consists of industry and professional associations,

non-government organisations and government observers who are involved in the planning, design, delivery and operation of our built environment, and are concerned with the social and environmental impacts of this sector.

The Australian Institute of Architects (AIA)

The Australian Institute of Architects is the peak body for the architectural profession in Australia. The AIA works to improve the built environment by promoting quality, responsible, sustainable design. Its mission is to make the world a better place through architecture. The AIA represents the interests of its 12,000 members, their professional standards and contemporary practice

and expand and advocate the value of architects and architecture to the sustainable growth of our community, economy and culture. AIA was incorporated in 1930.

The Australian Institute of Refrigeration, Air Conditioning and Heating (AIRAH)

The Australian Institute of Refrigeration, Air Conditioning and Heating (AIRAH) is a member organisation that represents over 10,000 air conditioning, refrigeration, heating and ventilation professionals across Australia. AIRAH provides continuing professional development, accreditation programs and technical publications to develop the skills of industry practitioners and encourage best practice across the industry. AIRAH was formed in 1920.

The Association of Building Sustainability Assessors (ABSA)

The Association of Building Sustainability Assessors (ABSA) connects homeowners to accredited energy raters and assessors, provides up-to-date information about energy efficiency and building thermal performance, and taps into networks of green building suppliers and energy efficiency organisations.

ABSA represents their members to government and regulatory bodies, accredits and trains building performance professionals, and provides sustainability assessment services and advice to homeowners and the building and construction industry. ABSA was established in 1998.

The Air conditioning and Mechanical Contractors’ Association (AMCA)

The Ai r conditioning & Mechanical Contractors’ Association (AMCA) is a trade association serving air conditioning and mechanical services companies that operate in the commercial and industrial sector. AMCA advocates for its members to government, other construction and service industry groups and the unions. It was established in 1961.

The Australian Property Institute (API)

The Australian Property Institute (API) aims to set and maintain the highest standards of professional practice, education, ethics and professional conduct for its members and the broader property profession. API members include residential, commercial and plant and machinery valuers, property advisers, property analysts and fund managers, property lawyers, and property researchers and academics. API represents approximately 8,600 property professionals throughout Australia and overseas.

The Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers (CIBSE)

The Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers (CIBSE) is a professional body for building services engineers that promotes the career of building services engineers by accrediting courses of study in further and higher education, approving workbased training programmes, publishing Guidance and Codes and providing routes to full professional Registration and Membership, including Chartered Engineer, Incorporated Engineer and Engineering Technician. CIBSE was established in 1976.

The Energy Efficiency and Conservation Authority (EECA) New Zealand EECA - Te Tari Tia i ngao (The ffice That uards The Energy)–

EECA is a New Zealand public sector organisation established to encourage, support and promote energy efficiency, energy conservation and the use of renewable sources of energy.

EECA works with industry, government and community partners to provide people in business and at home with the information, tools, and support they need to make changes in their energy use. EECA are the license holders of NABERS NZ.

The Energy Efficiency Council (EEC)

The Energy Efficiency Council is the peak body for commercial energy efficiency and cogeneration services and products in Australia. The EEC aims to grow the market for energy efficiency services and bring providers and clients together to develop products that meet client needs. Its membership consists of energy efficiency and cogeneration businesses. The EEC was established in 2009.

The Facilities Management Association of Australia (FMA Australia)

The Facility Management Association of Australia (FMA Australia) is a member organisation that advocates for the interests of the facilities management profession, and promotes facilities management to business and the wider community and encourages the development of university courses in facility management

Its membership consists of professionals involved in the strategic and operational management of facilities and the provision of relevant products and services for public and private sector organisations. FMA Australia was established in 1989.

The Green Building Council of Australia (GBCA)

The Green Building Council of Australia (GBCA) is a national, not-for-profit industry organisation. The GBCA's mission is to develop a sustainable property industry for Australia and drive the adoption of green building practices through market-based solutions. GBCA promotes green building programs, technologies, design practices and operations as well as the integration of green building initiatives into mainstream design, construction and operation of buildings. It was established in 2002.

The Property Council of Australia (PCA)

The roperty Council of Australia is the pea body advocate for Australia’s $600 billion property industry. It is governed by an industry board and its membership consists of the nation’s major investors, property owners and developers, as well as the industry’s professional service and trade providers. The Property Funds Association (PFA)

The Property Funds Association of Australia (formerly ADPIA - Australian Direct Property Investment Association) provides direct property investors and managers with an organisation to represent their interests, promote their industry and provide a forum for research and education.

The PFA membership consists of Australian Financial Services Licensed (AFSL) property fund managers, their advisors, consultants and representatives. It was established in 1998.

The Real Estate Institute of Australia (REIA)

The Real Estate Institute of Australia (REIA) is the national professional association for A ustralia’s real estate sector. REIA is a politically non-aligned organisation that provides research and advice to government, the real estate sector, media and the public on a range of issues affecting the commercial and residential property markets.

R EIA’s membership comprises the seven state and territory Real Estate Institutes, through which about 80 per cent of real estate firms and licensed agents are collectively represented. REIA was established in 1924.

The Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS)

The Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS) is a global property professional body of more than 100,000 members. RICS aims to regulate and promote the profession, provide impartial advice, analysis and guidance, and maintain educational and professional standards and a strict code of ethics. RICS was established in 1868.

The Shopping Centre Council of Australia (SCCA)

The Shopping Centre Council of Australia (SCCA) represents investors and managers of shopping centres. The mission of SCCA is to be an effective advocate for these investors and managers and to promote a better understanding of the significant contribution that shopping centres make to economic growth. The SCCA was established in 1998.

The Total Environment Centre

The Total Environment Centre (TEC) is an independent, non-profit group that aims to protect the natural and urban environment by flagging the issues, driving debate, supporting community activism and pushing for better environmental policy and practice. The Total Environment Centre was established in 1972.

What we do

R ATINGS

NABERS ratings are used by property owners, managers and tenants across Australia to understand, manage and promote their sustainability performance. They provide credible information about the environmental performance of commercial buildings and tenancies, shopping centres, hotels and data centres. Ratings are available for energy efficiency, water efficiency, waste management or indoor environment quality. NABERS rates these metrics on a six star rating scale where one star reflects poor performance and six stars is market leading.

NABERS ratings are based on the actual measured energy consumption, water consumption, waste generation & indoor environment quality of a building. Ratings reflect the environmental impact of the building in operation

over a year, and are renewed annually. NABERS provides building owners, tenants and the market with a clear and reliable measure of building environmental performance and improvements over time.

C OMMERCIAL B UILDING

D ISCLOSURE

The Commonwealth’s Building Energy Efficiency Disclosure (BEED) Act 2010 requires Australian commercial office buildings over 2000 m2 to obtain and disclose a valid NABERS Energy base building or whole building rating at the point of sale or lease. They are also required to obtain a Tenancy Lighting Assessment that discloses the energy use from lighting in the tenancy areas. This regulatory requirement is overseen by the Commercial Building Disclosure (CBD) program managed by the Commonwealth Department of Industry.

NABERS supports the CBD program by providing information and advice regarding NABERS ratings, including conducting audits on 5% of ratings undertaken for the purposes of complying with the BEED Act.

C OMMITMENT A GREEMENTS

NABERS encourages excellence in building design and operation by offering developers and tenants the opportunity to sign a Commitment Agreement. The agreement is applicable to new or refurbished commercial office buildings and tenancies.

Signatories to a Commitment Agreement agree to design, build and commission the building or tenancy to meet a NABERS Energy star rating higher than 4 stars, once they have 12 months of operational data. The designs are required to be modeled for predicted performance, and the models reviewed by an Accredited NABERS Independent Design Reviewer. In exchange the Commitment Agreement allows developers to promote and market the anticipated excellence in energy efficient/greenhouse performance of the new or refurbished commercial office building using the NABERS brand.

Thirty-Three (33) Commitment Agreements were signed in 2012/13.

T RAINING AND A CCREDITATION

NABERS ratings can only be conducted by NABERS Accredited Assessors. To become accredited, Assessors must successfully complete an introductory session, a two day accreditation course, a written exam and two supervised ratings. Assessors can also complete additional training, examinations and supervisions to become accredited to deliver NABERS Shopping Centre and Data Centre ratings to market .

There are currently 726 Accredited Assessors, including 77 that are also accredited to deliver Shopping Centre ratings and 23 to deliver Data Centre ratings.

In 2012/13, 379 registrations were received for NABERS training events.

A UDITING

To ensure the robustness, credibility, reliability and integrity of ratings, the NABERS program routinely undertakes two levels of audit. A Level 1 Audit is conducted on 100% of NABERS rating applications to ensure that the relevant

data has been correctly entered, and the Rules for Collecting and Using Data have been applied.

A Level 2 Audit is also conducted on a sample of ratings. A Level 2 audit is a peer review quality assurance process of reconstructing the building rating using the original data and documentation. It verifies whether a rating is correct and fully complies with the NABERS Rules, Rulings, processes and procedures.

T OOL D EVELOPMENT &E NHANCEMENT

NABERS rating tools are routinely updated and new tools are periodically developed to meet industry needs. Existing rating tools are reviewed and enhanced in consideration of emerging technical and practical issues to ensure that they are responsive to developments in new practices in building use and operation.

New NABERS tools are developed for suitable building sectors in consideration of the potential environmental benefit that could be achieved, the market potential, and the technical feasibility of a NABERS environmental performance tool for that sector. Any proposals for new tools are closely assessed to ensure that they are relevant, practical and supported by industry.

NABERS E QUIPPED

NABERS Equipped enables licensed organisations to incorporate the NABERS algorithms into their products or systems to provide customers with estimates of NABERS ratings based on real-time energy data.

In 2012/13, three new service providers entered into license agreements with NABERS for NABERS Equipped.

C ONSULTATION

The NABERS program works with industry to ensure that stakeholders are informed and consulted with about program developments. NABERS regularly conducts industry consultation with the Stakeholder Advisory Committee, NABERS Auditors and Assessors and other targeted industry representatives, as well as conducting public consultation. Expert industry representatives also volunteer to participate in NABERS Technical Advisory Groups (TAGs) to provide feedback and input into new NABERS tool development and tool reviews.

Environmental Benefit

Focus areas in 2012-13

? Increasing mar et upta e of es tablished NABERS tools.

? roviding the mar et with new rating tools that deliver a clear environmental benefit.

The widespread use of NABERS ratings to benchmark environmental performance drives market competition to improve ratings, which has a direct environmental benefit.

To date, NABERS ratings have increased by an average of 0.6 stars for energy and 0.5 stars for water, which has delivered annual savings of 380,000

tonnes of greenhouse gases, 440,000 megawatt hours of electricity and 1.6 million litres of water.

NABERS E NERGY FOR D ATA C ENTRES

In February 2013 the latest rating tools in the NABERS suite were released –NABERS Energy for data centres. These include a rating tool for Infrastructure, IT Equipment and Whole Facility. The NABERS IT Equipment tool that directly rates the environmental performance of servers, storage and other IT equipment within a data centre is believed to be a world first.

It has been estimated that data centres are responsible for approximately

1.5% of Australia’s current electricity consumption1, and this figure is expected to rise significantly in the next five years. The NABERS Energy for Data Centres tools will play an important role in moderating this impact.

By allowing data centre owners and operators to benchmark and promote their energy efficiency, NABERS Energy for Data Centres will lay the critical foundation for a market that rewards innovators and efficiency leaders in the field.

The tools were developed with the strong support of industry. Even before the tool was released, the NSW government had committed to achieving a NABERS Energy for Data Centres Infrastructure rating at their new Metronode data centres. Once the tool was released a commitment to achieve a minimum 5 star rating was contractually agreed with Metronode.

At June 30 2013, the NABERS program had trained 17 Trainee Assessors that are ready to conduct the first NABERS energy for data centre ratings.

1 Johnson, P. & Marker, T. of Pitt and Sherry (2009) Data Centre Energy Efficiency Product Profile.

NABERSNZ

In June 2013 the NABERS program crossed the Tasman and the NABERSNZ Energy for offices tool was launched.

NABERSNZ was made possible through a partnership between the OEH and the New Zealand overnment’s Energy Efficiency and Conservation Author ity (EECA). It will assist the NZ property sector to compare their assets against their market peers and take action to improve the performance of their buildings. Electricity use in buildings costs New Zealand businesses around $1.25 billion every year and EECA estimates around 20 - 25% of this could be saved and collectively worth around $200 million to the NZ economy.

As at 30 June 2013, there were 11 NABERSNZ Trainee Assessors ready to perform NABERSNZ ratings.

For more information on NABERSNZ visit https://www.wendangku.net/doc/f21611116.html,

T HE V ALUE OF S USTAINABILITY

The annual IPD Australian Green Property Index, tracks the investment performance of commercial office buildings that have been awarded a NABERS Energy or Water rating, and measures their investment performance.

In 2012-13, the Index reported that investment returns for offices with high NABERS ratings (4-6 stars) consistently outperformed those with lower ratings (0 -3.5 stars). These properties also showed stronger capital growth. The report concluded that ‘owners who improve the sustainability attributes of

their buildings are more likely to experience relatively stronger growth in capital values’.

Engagement

Focus areas in 2012-13

? Keeping industry, assessors, bui lding owners and end users informed.

? Establishing and strengthening mechanisms to consult and involve stakeholders.

? Building strategic partnerships to achieve our shared objectives

NABERS is a government-run program that works in collaboration with industry and other government bodies

2012-13C OMMUNICATIONS S NAPSHOT:

1 piece of editorial in Australian Environmental Management

2 sponsored awards – CitySwitch National Awards and AIRAH Awards

3 conferences presentations

3 NABERS events

4 event stalls

6 official media announcements

12 program publications, and

234 media hits across 74 publications

The top five themes of NABERS coverage in the media were:

1. The NABERS rating of sold buildings and targeted ratings for new buildings

2. The launch of NABERS Energy for data centres

3. The high value of good NABERS ratings in the property market

4. The release of the Energy Management Guide for Tenants

5. The NABERS Cogeneration / Trigeneration ruling

A WARD W INNING P ARTNERSHIP

In December 2012 the NABERS partnership with the Commercial Building Disclosure (CBD) program was awarded Energy Efficiency Council’s “Best Energy Saving rogram in Australia” award for programs run by a utility or government. The judges noted that the NABERS/CBD partnership has had a serious material impact on the take up of energy efficiency in the building sector, and has genuinely transformed the market by linking the value of energy efficiency to core business in the property sector. The programs were recognised as world’s best practic e in energy disclosure for commercial buildings.

NABERS TAKE E NGAGEMENT O NLINE

This year the NABERS National Administrator trialled a new online stakeholder engagement platform. The 'have your say' platform contains a suite of tools for sharing resources and providing feedback such as smart forums, polls, document and video uploads, and newsfeeds, that will allow for greater connection and sharing of ideas within the NABERS community. It was used to host on-line discussions for the Indoor Environment Technical Working Group. This pilot was successful in engaging members and

stimulating discussion and will be expanded to wider stakeholder groups for future consultation processes.

NABERS N EWSLETTERS

This year NABERS introduced a new monthly electronic newsletter for keeping people and businesses informed about NABERS program developments. The content is audience dependent and includes case studies, achievements, training courses, partner events and new offerings, as well as updates to process documents and new rulings. The newsletter is delivered using dynamic list management so that people can sign up to receive our newsletter on the homepage of our website and can unsubscribe at any time. It also allows the National Administrator to track web traffic and understand which topics generate the most interest.

At the end of 2012-13, there were 1,826 individuals on our mailing list, with an average of 50 new signups every month.

Service Delivery

Focus areas in 2012-13

? roviding timely, professional and responsive services to NABERS Assessors, customers and stakeholders.

? Ensuring accurate, consistent and correct application of the NABERS tools and rules.

Efficient and effective service delivery of the NABERS program means that quality assurance is thorough, administration is prompt and technical advice is clear and consistent.

This year the introduction of new software and a website platform lead to notable improvements in the efficiency and effectiveness of service delivery by the NABERS Program.

S ERVICE D ELIVERY S TATISTICS

In September 2012 the NSW Minister for the Environment Robyn Parker launched a new suite of websites for the NABERS program, including a refreshed public site, a secure members site and a new ratings platform for Assessors.

I NTRODUCING NABERS R ATE

This year the NABERS team developed and launched NABERS Rate – a custom-built online platform for lodging and certifying NABERS ratings. The NABERS Rate application allows Assessors to work offline to gather and input data, and then upload the rating to the NABERS web service in one easy step. It has improved the time taken for the NABERS team to conduct Level 1 audits and certify ratings, -- 96% of ratings are now certified within 10 days, up from 90% last financial year. Further enhancements to NABERS Rate to continue to improve the delivery of our Assessor support service are underway.

N EW NABERS W EBSITE

The new public and members websites were developed to improve communication and processes and provide a better experience for all NABERS customers and stakeholders. Customers can now view their whole portfolio in one place and track their rating applications in real time. Communication channels and information sharing between customers, Assessors, and the NABERS National Administrator have also been enhanced.

The websites and NABERS Rate have:

? reduced duplication, paperwor and rating processing time

? provided a more transparent and streamlined system where ratings can be lodged and tracked in real time

? enabled customers to be more actively inv olved and informed

? improved the accessibility of resources and technical advice

The website will continue to be improved over the next financial year.

W EBSITE S TATISTICS

From 1 November 2012 to 30 June 2013 the NABERS Public Website had: 64,090 total visits (including 3,079 from OEH/NA)

31,492 unique visitors

325,743 total page views

5.06 minutes average time on site

Most visited pages are the Rating Calculator (77,994), the Home page

(60,038) and Rating Register (32,278).

Innovation

Focus areas In 2012-13

? Collaborating with the mar et to support new technologies and processes.? Strengthening and harmonising NABERS rating tools and rules to respond to new practices in building use and operation.

NABERS aims to meet the changes and emerging needs of the commercial built environment.

I NDOOR E NVIRONMENT R EVIEW

Indoor environment quality is a major area of focus for the commercial office sector and is important for health, productivity, comfort and occupant wellbeing. That is why NABERS first developed the NABERS Indoor Environment rating tool in 2008 to measure and compare the quality of factors such as lighting, ventilation and thermal sensation within office buildings. As well as providing a world-first benchmark, NABERS Indoor Environment allowed building owners, managers and tenants to better understand the services they provide, helping them to identify opportunities for improving conditions for occupants as well as reducing energy and water use.

Four years after its release, the National Administrator commenced a review of the tool in response to customer and industry feedback. This feedback highlighted opportunities for improvement including increasing transparency in the way results are calculated and communicated, incorporating the latest indoor environment science and tapping into new value-adding opportunities.

In 2012-13 NABERS convened a Technical Working Group (TWG) with indoor environment experts from academia as well as the property and indoor environment services sectors to advise on how best to improve the tool. Over the past six months, NABERS has been working closely with the TWG on improvements that will give the tool more clarity, greater ease of use and, ultimately, more value for customers. The review is due for completion in 2013-14.

E NERGY M ANAGEMENT G UIDE FOR T ENANTS

In 2012/13, two hundred and four (204) NABERS Energy for offices – tenancy ratings were certified by the NABERS team. Office tenants are responsible for up to 50% of the energy used by their building, and the NABERS program understood that more was needed to help this important sector understand and reduce its energy use.

In November 2012, the NSW Environment Minister Robyn Parker released the NABERS Energy Management Guide for Tenants. This Guide is designed to help office tenants take control of their energy costs and environmental impacts. The Minister said the Guide will assist tenants in office buildings to manage their energy use efficiently while still having the light, warmth, cooling and power needed to support their operations.

The Guide provides advice for tenants under various lease arrangements, including practical advice on steps any tenant can take themselves, as well as direction on where to go for professional advice and assistance. It was developed in collaboration with industry partners and is illustrated with several real life examples.

The Guide is now available for free download from the resources section of the NABERS website: https://www.wendangku.net/doc/f21611116.html,.au

S HOPPING C ENTRE B ENCHMARK U PDATE

In October 2012 NABERS released revised benchmarks for the NABERS Energy and Water for shopping centres tools. In response to feedback from industry, the National Administrator and the NABERS Shopping Centre Technical Advisory Group (TAG) undertook a six-month technical review of the rating results from a broad spectrum of 69 shopping centres.

As a result of this review a number of changes to the tools were introduced, including an amendment to how the area of a shopping centre is calculated, an adjustment for vertical transport, and consideration of the centre's trading days and extended operating hours.

The updated benchmarks also included a move to the new six star rating scale.

All of the changes were peer-reviewed by independent technical experts and consulted on with industry through the Stakeholder Advisory Committee (SAC). The changes have been well received by industry with the number of shopping centre ratings undertaken continuing to grow.

NABERS KEEPS PACE WITH C OGENERATION

In 2012, the NABERS program responded to innovation in cogeneration and trigeneration technology by releasing the Interim Methodology on Cogeneration following industry and stakeholder consultation. This document sets out the rules for attributing greenhouse gas emissions from onsite

cogeneration to various users within a building when conducting a NABERS Energy rating.

In October 2012, the NABERS Steering Committee also agreed to recognise the environmental benefit of low emissions electricity from certified offsite cogeneration and trigeneration plants on the NABERS Energy rating certificate in the same way that GreenPower currently is. An industry-led working group with NABERS representation has commenced work to create a national standard for attributing emissions to purchased thermal energy and electricity.

Accountability

Focus areas in 2012-13

? Wor ing with sta eholders to develop the strategic direction of the program.? Being open and transparent about NABERS program activities and priorities. NABERS is delivered by the NSW Government under the guidance of the Commonwealth and states through a National Steering Committee. The responsibilities of each jurisdiction are established in the NABERS Program Management Agreement, which also sets out their financial contributions to the program. The NABERS Stakeholder Advisory Committee, together with Technical Advisory Groups and specific consultations, provide industry support and advice to the program.

N ATIONAL S TEERING C OMMITTEE

The NABERS program is delivered nationally by the NSW Office of Environment and Heritage under the guidance of Commonwealth, State and Territory governments through the National Steering Committee and the NABERS Program Management Agreement. The National Steering Committee is the decision-making body of the program and is responsible for providing direction on issues of strategic importance.

The Committee met three times in 2012-13 and key decisions and meeting outcomes were released on the NABERS website.

T HE NABERS S TRATEGIC P LAN 2013-2018

NABERS recently released its first five year strategic plan. This plan has been developed in collaboration with industry and government to establish a clear and focused roadmap for the NABERS program moving forward.

The plan responds to two major industry reviews conducted by the Property Council of Australia (PCA) and Australian Institute of Refrigeration Air conditioning and Heating (AIRAH). These highlighted the importance of timely and meaningful consultation with industry, the need for tools to be relevant and robust, and included specific recommendations to take swift action on some outstanding technical issues such as cogeneration and shopping centre rating benchmarks.

The National Steering Committee welcomed this comprehensive industry feedback and has incorporated many of the report themes into the NABERS Strategic Plan 2013-18.

The plan outlines the overall vision and core values of NABERS and sets out five broad program objectives: Environmental Benefit, Engagement, Service

Delivery, Innovation and Accountability. With key actions for working together in the delivery of these objectives, the plan is responsive to stakeholder needs and supports the NABERS program to continue to listen to our industry partners in achieving shared outcome

NABERS Program statistics 2013-14

国内外绿色建筑评估标准

绿色建筑评估标准 【字体：大中小】2010-09-01 11:12:43 来源：中国天气网 目前全球对建筑“绿色”与否的评估标准主要有：美国绿色建筑委员会的“领先能源与环境设计建筑评级体系”（LEEDTM），英国的建筑科研组织（Building Research Establishment，BRE）“环境评价法”（BREEAM），日本的CASBEE体系等。其中以LEEDTM标准体系为最完善，是目前在世界各国的各类建筑环保评估、绿色建筑评估以及 建筑可持续性评估标准中最具有影响力。 美国的LEED绿色建筑评级体系 为了促进绿色建筑的发展与实践，美国绿色建筑委员会USGBC建立了一套自愿性的国家标准LEED （Leadershipin Energyand Environmental Design－领导型的能源与环境设计），该体系用于开发高性能的可持续性 建筑，进行绿色建筑的评级。简而言之，LEED是设计、建造和世界上最好最环保建筑的一套先进体系，整个项目包 括培训、专业人员认可、提供资源支持和进行建筑性能的第三方认证等多方面的内容。 中国绿色建筑三星认证 为了推动中国绿色建筑的发展。2006年6月1日，原建设部出台了《绿色建筑评价标准》（以下简称《标准》），第一次为“绿色建筑”贴上了标签。中国绿色建筑三星认证以《标准》为基础，由节地与室外环境、节能与能源利用、 节水与水资源利用、节材与材料资源利用、室内环境质量和运营管理（住宅建筑）或全生命周期综合性能（公共建筑）六类指标组成。每类指标包括控制项、一般项与优选项。通过这六类指标将建筑划分为一星至三星3个等级。 为加强绿色建筑评价标识的管理，住房和城乡建设部近日发出通知，印发《绿色建筑评价标识实施细则》，明确绿色建筑评价标识有效期为３年。 通知明确，住房和城乡建设部委托建设部科技发展促进中心负责绿色建筑评价标识的具体组织实施等管理工作和 三星级绿色建筑的评价工作。委托具备条件的地方住房和城乡建设管理部门开展所辖地区一星级和二星级绿色建筑评价 标识工作。 通知指出，绿色建筑评价标识分为“绿色建筑设计评价标识”和“绿色建筑评价标识”。其中，“绿色建筑设计评价标识”对处于规划设计阶段和施工阶段的住宅建筑和公共建筑，按照《绿色建筑评价标识管理办法》对其进行评价标识， 标识有效期为２年。“绿色建筑评价标识”对已竣工并投入使用的住宅建筑和公共建筑，按照《绿色建筑评价标识管理办 法》对其进行评价标识，标识有效期为３年。 从LEED看我国《绿色建筑评价标准》 任何一套绿色建筑评估体系，特别是一些推荐性的评估体系，都需要考虑以下几个问题，如果这些基本的问题无法得到很好地解决， 那么这套体系最终不可能得到广泛的认同和实施： 第一个问题就是开发商如何受益？ 也就是如何让得到绿色认证的建筑得到更高的估值，这会给开发商带来最直接的利益。当然这是针对那些不仅仅是想"打绿色牌"，炒作绿色的发展商，而是一些脚踏实地的，具有前瞻性的开发商。因为我们目前所讲的绿色建筑，不仅仅是建造完之后的给一个认证，而

[实用参考]澳大利亚建筑规范分类BCA中英文.doc

Class1:oneormorebuildingswhichinassociationconstitute— 一个或多个建筑联合构成（联合构成以下建筑的一个或多个建筑） (a)Class1a—asingledwellingbeing— 单独的住处（下列种类的独栋房屋） (i)adetachedhouse; 分离的房子（独立式房屋） (ii)oneofagroupoftwoormoreattacheddwellings,eachbeingabuilding,sepa ratedbyafire-resistingwall,includingarowhouse,terracehouse,townhouse orvillaunit; 一组由两个以上（且每个作为一栋建筑）相连的住处的其中之一，彼此由防火墙隔开。这种相连的住处包括一排房子，连栋式住宅，市内住宅或别墅。（由防火墙分隔的两间连接式住宅的中的一间，其各自可以作为一个独立建筑，包括连排住宅、连栋住宅、独立洋房或别墅单元房。） (b)Class1b— (i)aboardinghouse,guesthouse,hostelorthelike— 符合下列条件的公寓，宾馆，旅社 (A)withatotalareaofallfloorsnoteGceeding300m2measuredovertheenclos ingwallsoftheClass1b; 占地面积或围墙范围不超过300平米 (B)inwhichnotmorethan12personswouldordinarilyberesident; 通常不超过12个人居住 (ii)4ormoresingledwellingslocatedononeallotmentandusedforshort-term holidayaccommodation,whicharenotlocatedaboveorbelowanotherdwelli ngoranotherClassofbuildingotherthanaprivategarage.

绿色建筑评价标准GB

绿色建筑评价标准》GB 50378-2006 介绍 自2006年6月1日起施行。 一、概述在建筑的建造和使用过程中，需要消耗大量的自然资源，同时增加环境负荷。据统计，人类从自然界所获得的50%以上的物质原料用来建造各类建筑及其附属设备。这些建筑在建造和使用过程中又消耗了全球能量的50%左右；与建筑有关的空气污染、光污染、电磁污染等占环境总体污染的34%；建筑垃圾占人类活动产生垃圾总量的40%。 绿色建筑的定义: 在建筑的全寿命周期内，最大限度地节约资源（节能、节地、节水、节材）、保护环境和减少污染，为人们提供健康、适用和高效的使用空间，与自然和谐共生的建筑。 绿色建筑是将可持续发展理念引入建筑领域的结果，将成为未来建筑的主导趋势。目前，世界各国普遍重视绿色建筑的研究，许多国家和组织都在绿色建筑方面制定了相关政策和评价体系，有的已着手研究编制可持续建筑标准。由于世界各国经济发展水平、地理位置和人均资源等条件不同，对绿色建筑的研究与理解也存在差异。 我国政府从基本国情出发，从人与自然和谐发展，节约能源，有效利用资源和保护环境的角度，提出发展“节能省地型住宅和公共建筑” ，主要内容是节能、节地、节水、节材（即“四节” ）与环境保护，注重以人为本，强调可持续发展。从这个意义上讲，节能省地型住宅和公共建筑与绿色建筑、可持续建筑提法不同，内涵相通，具有某种一致性，是具有中国特色的绿色建筑和可持续建筑理念。 我国资源总量和人均资源量都严重不足，同时我国的消费增长速度惊人，在资源再生利用率上也远低于发达国家。我国各地区在气候、地理环境、自然资源、经济社会发展水平与民俗文化等方面都存在巨大差异。我国正处于工业化、城镇化加速发展时期。中国现有建筑总面积方米，预计到 400 多亿平2020年还将新增建筑面积约300亿平方米。在我国发展绿色建 筑，是一项意义重大而十分迫切的任务。借鉴国际先进经验，建立一套适合我国国情的绿色建筑评价体系，反映建筑领域可持续发展理念，对积极引导大力发展绿色建筑，促进节能省地型住宅和公共建筑的发展，具有十分重要的意义。 二、编制原则 1、借鉴国际先进经验，结合我国国情。 2、重点突出“四节”与环保要求。 3、体现过程控制。

绿色建筑评价体系研究综述

《管理研究方法论》 课程作业 绿色建筑评价体系研究综述 学科专业管理科学与工程 年级班级1105106 姓名李雪 2011年12 月30日

绿色建筑评价体系研究综述 摘要：随着环境问题的日益凸显和全球资源的紧张，可持续设计已经逐渐成为世界建筑的大势所趋，绿色建筑正是可持续发展思想在建筑设计领域更深层面的体现形式。当可持续发展成为人类和自然协调发展的全球化战略的时候，绿色建筑也成为建筑业发展的必然趋势，而绿色建筑的评价是绿色建筑发展的关键问题。本文首先介绍了论文的研究背景与意义，其次介绍了国内外对可持续发展和绿色建筑方面的研究现状，通过比较国内外推广绿色建筑的评价体系，讨论了我国绿色建筑评价体系与国外评价体系的差别与共同之处，在此基础上指出了我国绿色建筑评价体系存在不足，应继续完善中国绿色建筑评价体系，推动中国绿色建筑的发展。 关键词：绿色建筑评价体系完善 Abstrct:as environmental problems become apparent and tensions of global resources， sustainable design has become the trend of world architecture. Green building is the idea of sustainable development in the field of architectural design reflected at deeper levels. When sustainable development become globalization strategy of harmonious development between human and nature,green building has become an inevitable trend of development of building industry,and green building assessment is key to the development of green building issues. This article first describes has papers of research background and significance,second describes has at home and abroad on sustainable development and green building aspects of research status,through comparison at home and abroad promotion green building of evaluation system,discussion has in China green building evaluation system and abroad evaluation system of differences and common of Department,this Foundation Shang pointed out that has in China green building evaluation system exists insufficient,should continues to perfect China green building evaluation system,promoting China green building of development. Key words: Green building， Evaluation system， perfect 1引言 1.1研究背景与意义 20世纪70年代世界能源危机的爆发，使人们意识到以牺牲生态环境为代价的高速文明发展史难以为继，也认识到节能与环保对人类生存的地球的重要性，

各国绿色建筑标准对比

各国绿色建筑标准对比 1、美国的标准，LEED评价体系，美国推出的绿色建筑评价标准，可以说是国际上商业化运作最成功的标准；美国的建筑业与钢铁工业、汽车工业长期并称为“三大支柱”，建筑业是美国比较完善的产业，LEED 评估体系主要由五大方面若干指标构成其技术框架，主要从建筑场址、水资源利用、建筑节能与大气、资源与材料、室内空气质量几个方面对建筑进行综合评估。 2、英国的标准，BREEAM评价体系，英国推出的绿色建筑评价标准，是国际上最早的绿色建筑评价标准；英国由于面积狭小，早期经济发展，工业快速发展，环境因素导致其绿色建筑起步早，其评估方法比较简单，就是一些评估覆盖能源使用、资源、污染物排放、场地及室内环境等各个方面的条款，英国的绿色建筑政策和资金的支持使得BREEAM评价体系在英国市场上的占有率很高。 3、日本的标准，CASBEE评价体系，日本绿色建筑发展主要是为了满足其工业和经济的发展，其评估体系分为Q（建筑环境性能、质量）和LR（建筑环境负荷的减少），分为5级评分制，很多评估子项。 4、澳大利亚的标准，GREEN STA评价体系，目前澳大利亚有两种体系，一种是NABERS（国家建筑环境评估），一种是GSC（绿色星级认证），主要从管理、室内环境质量、能源、交通、水、材料、土地使用及生态、排放等方面进行评估。 5、德国的标准，DGNB评价体系，是当今世界第二代绿色建筑评估体

系，创建于2007年，由德国可持续建筑委员会组织德国建筑行业的各专业人士共同开发，涵盖了生态、经济、社会三大方面。评价内容包括生态质量、经济质量、社会文化及功能质量、技术质量、程序质量、场址选择等。 6、加拿大的标准，GB TOOL评价体系，1998年确定此评价体系，主要是新建和改建翻新建筑进行评价，通过对多达35个项目进行研究和交流而确定的标准，主要评价环境的可持续发展指标、室内空气质量、可维护性、环境负荷、运行管理、经济性、资源消耗等内容。 7、中国的标准，《绿色建筑评价标准》，中国自己的绿色建筑评价标准，目前获得绿色建筑认证可以获得国家相应的补贴；主要是节地与室外环境、节能与能源利用、节水与水资源利用、节材与材料资源利用、室内环境质量、施工管理、运营管理几个方面。 绿色建筑评价标准还有芬兰的标准，Promis E评价体系、挪威的标准，Ecoprofile评价体系和瑞典的标准，Eco-effect评价体系。

绿色建筑节能评价标准

绿色建筑节能评价 标准

《绿色建筑评价标准》GB 50378- 介绍 自 6月1日起施行。 一、概述 在建筑的建造和使用过程中，需要消耗大量的自然资源，同时增加环境负荷。据统计，人类从自然界所获得的50%以上的物质原料用来建造各类建筑及其附属设备。这些建筑在建造和使用过程中又消耗了全球能量的50%左右；与建筑有关的空气污染、光污染、电磁污染等占环境总体污染的34%；建筑垃圾占人类活动产生垃圾总量的40%。 绿色建筑的定义:在建筑的全寿命周期内，最大限度地节约资源(节能、节地、节水、节材)、保护环境和减少污染，为人们提供健康、适用和高效的使用空间，与自然和谐共生的建筑。 绿色建筑是将可持续发展理念引入建筑领域的结果，将成为未来建筑的主导趋势。当前，世界各国普遍重视绿色建筑的研究，许多国家和组织都在绿色建筑方面制定了相关政策和评价体系，有的已着手研究编制可持续建筑标准。由于世界各国经济发展水平、地理位置和人均资源等条件不同，对绿色建筑的研究与理解也存在差异。 中国政府从基本国情出发，从人与自然和谐发展，节约能源，有效利用资源和保护环境的角度，提出发展“节能省地型住宅和公共建筑”，主要内容是节能、节地、节水、节材(即“四节”)与环境保护，

注重以人为本，强调可持续发展。从这个意义上讲，节能省地型住宅和公共建筑与绿色建筑、可持续建筑提法不同，内涵相通，具有某种一致性，是具有中国特色的绿色建筑和可持续建筑理念。 中国资源总量和人均资源量都严重不足，同时中国的消费增长速度惊人，在资源再生利用率上也远低于发达国家。中国各地区在气候、地理环境、自然资源、经济社会发展水平与民俗文化等方面都存在巨大差异。中国正处于工业化、城镇化加速发展时期。中国现有建筑总面积400多亿平方米，预计到2020年还将新增建筑面积约300亿平方米。在中国发展绿色建筑，是一项意义重大而十分迫切的任务。借鉴国际先进经验，建立一套适合中国国情的绿色建筑评价体系，反映建筑领域可持续发展理念，对积极引导大力发展绿色建筑，促进节能省地型住宅和公共建筑的发展，具有十分重要的意义。 二、编制原则 1、借鉴国际先进经验，结合中国国情。 2、重点突出“四节”与环保要求。 3、体现过程控制。 4、定量和定性相结合。 5、系统性与灵活性相结合。 三、标准简介 《标准》用于评价住宅建筑和办公建筑、商场、宾馆等公共建筑。《标准》的评价指标体系包括以下六大指标：

绿色建筑评价标准

《绿色建筑评价标准》修订版发布实施公告来源：中国房地产报发布时间：2014年06月09日 14:41 作者：焦玲玲 绿色建筑进入2.0时代 中国房地产报记者焦玲玲北京报道 已经施行8年的《绿色建筑评价标准》修订工作正式完成。 5月27日，国家工程建设标准化信息网挂出了“住房和城乡建设部关于发布国家标准《绿色建筑评价标准》的公告”：现批准《绿色建筑评价标准》为国家标准，编号为GB/T50378-2014，自2015年1月1日起实施。原《绿色建筑评价标准》GB/T50378-2006同时废止。 “锤子总算是落地啦。”、“谁有新标准？”、“求电子版终稿。”一时间圈内人士一下子活跃起来。一位消息灵通人士称，“6月中下旬才有纸质版，电子版目前搞不到”。 据悉，《绿色建筑评价标准》自2011年9月开始修编，2013年3月送审报批，至今历时两年半，这个用来衡量国内建筑绿色化的标尺才获得又一次“校准”，也标志着中国的绿色建筑开始进入2.0时代。 千呼万唤始出来 国家级《绿色建筑评价标准》自2006年首次发布实施以来，有效指导了我国绿色建筑实践工作。截至2013年底，全国共评出绿色建筑标识项目1446个，绿色建筑面积达到1.6亿平方米。在不久前发布的《国家新型城镇化规划》中主要指标显示，城镇绿色建筑占新建建筑的比重将由2012年的2%增加到2020年的50%。

“但随着绿色建筑各项工作的逐步推进，绿色建筑的内涵和外延不断丰富，各行业、各类别建筑践行绿色理念的需求不断提出，该标准已不能完全适应现阶段绿色建筑实践及评价工作的需要。”这是2011年启动标准修编时官方做出的修编说明。2011年9月28日，国家《绿色建筑评价标准》修订组成立暨第一次工作会议在北京召开。 在此之后，直到2013年3月，《绿色建筑评价标准》才送审报批，之后业界多次传出正式颁布时间，有人曾预测标准会在“2014年正式实施”，但迟迟未见出台。 历经周折的绿色建筑新国标修订显示出国家对绿色建筑评价标准重视的同时，另外一个背景就是国内绿色建筑经过8年的“野蛮生长”之后，出现的问题也不少。 住建部建筑节能与科技司司长杨榕在几天前的一次绿色建筑技术交流会上用“几重几轻”概括了当前绿色建筑发展中的几个问题，其中的一点就是目前绿色建筑重视技术材料的单项运用，对于技术整合尤其是与建筑功能的结合运用不足。 中国房地产报记者与业内多位人士交流现行国标时，有人甚至直言，当前绿色建筑标准中采用的条数计数法无形中在引导绿色建筑技术堆砌，“我用了哪些技术就打勾，然后加起来，做了几项就可以得一星，然后再增加几项，就可以拿二星级标识，然后是三星级标识”。 获取标识难度加大 5月24日，也就是在新国标颁布公告的3天前，中国房地产报记者有幸听取了新国标修订组成员、清华大学建筑学院教授林波荣关于《绿色建筑评价标准（修订版）》的解读报告。 据悉，新标准主要在“定位与原则”和“评价方法”上做了调整。新国标将标准适用范围由住宅建筑和公共建筑中的办公建筑、商业建筑和旅馆建筑，扩展至各类民用建筑；明确将评价分为设计评价和运行评价；在节地、节能、节材、节水、室内环境质量和运营管理六类指标基础上，增加施工管理，体现了绿色建筑的全过程控制，“施工管理”一级指标在运行标识阶段参评。

《绿色建筑评价标准》

绿色建筑评价标准 一、编制背景 在建筑得建造与使用过程中,需要消耗大量得自然资源,同时增加环境负荷。据统计,人类从自然界所获得得50%以上得物质原料用来建造各类建筑及其附属设备。这些建筑在建造与使用过程中又消耗了全球能量得50%左右;与建筑有关得空气污染、光污染、电磁污染等占环境总体污染得34%;建筑垃圾占人类活动产生垃圾总量得40%。 绿色建筑就是指在建筑得全寿命周期内,最大限度地节约资源(节能、节地、节水、节材)、保护环境与减少污染,为人们提供健康、适用与高效得使用空间,与自然与谐共生得建筑。绿色建筑就是将可持续发展理念引入建筑领域得结果,将成为未来建筑得主导趋势。目前,世界各国普遍重视绿色建筑得研究,许多国家与组织都在绿色建筑方面制定了相关政策与评价体系,有得已着手研究编制可持续建筑标准。由于世界各国经济发展水平、地理位置与人均资源等条件不同,对绿色建筑得研究与理解也存在差异。 我国政府从基本国情出发,从人与自然与谐发展,节约能源,有效利用资源与保护环境得角度,提出发展“节能省地型住宅与公共建筑”,主要内容就是节能、节地、节水、节材与环境保护,注重以人为本,强调可持续发展。从这个意义上讲,节能省地型住宅与公共建筑与绿色建筑、可持续建筑提法不同,内涵相通,具有某种一致性,就是具有中国特色得绿色建筑与可持续建筑理念。 我国资源总量与人均资源量都严重不足,同时我国得消费增长速度惊人,在资源再生利用率上也远低于发达国家。我国各地区在气候、地理环境、自然资源、经济社会发展水平与民俗文化等方面都存在巨大差异。我国正处于工业化、城镇化加速发展时期。中国现有建筑总面积400多亿平方米,预计到2020年还将新增建筑面积约300亿平方米。在我国发展绿色建筑,就是一项意义重大而十分迫切得任务。借鉴国际先进经验,建立一套适合我国国情得绿色建筑评价体系,反映建筑领域可持续发展理念,对积极引导大力发展绿色建筑,促进节能省地型住宅与公共建筑得发展,具有十分重要得意义。 在《国务院关于做好建设节约型社会近期重点工作得通知》(国发[2005]21号)及《建设部关于建设领域资源节约今明两年重点工作得安排意见》(建科[2005]98号)中均提出了完善资源节约标准得要求,并提出了编制《绿色建筑技术导则》、《绿色建筑评价标准》等标准得具体要求。 二、编制原则 1、借鉴国际先进经验,结合我国国情。 2、重点突出“四节”与环保要求。 3、体现过程控制。 4、定量与定性相结合。 5、系统性与灵活性相结合。 三、编制情况 根据建设部建标标函[2005]63号得要求,由中国建筑科学研究院、上海市建筑科学研究院会同中国城市规划设计研究院、清华大学、中国建筑工程总公司、中国建筑材料科学研究院、国家给水排水工程技术中心、深圳市建筑科学研究院、城市建设研究院等单位共同编制《绿色建筑评价标准》(以下简称《标准》)。 在编制过程中,编制组借鉴国外同类标准,进行了专题分析研究,召开了专家研讨会,开展了《标准》试评工作,经反复讨论、修改,形成了《标准》征求意见稿。 四、标准简介 《标准》用于评价住宅建筑与办公建筑、商场、宾馆等公共建筑。《标准》得评价指标体系包括以下六大指标: 1)节地与室外环境;2)节能与能源利用;3)节水与水资源利用;4)节材与材料资源利用;5)室内环境质量;6)运营管理(住宅建筑)、全生命周期综合性能(公共建筑)。 各大指标中得具体指标分为控制项、一般项与优选项三类。其中,控制项为评为绿色建筑得必备条款;优选项主要指实现难度较大、指标要求较高得项目。对同一对象,可根据需要与可能分别提出对应于控制项、一般项与优选项得指标要求。 绿色建筑得必备条件为全部满足《标准》第四章住宅建筑或第五章公共建筑中控制项要求。按满足一般项与优选项得程度,绿色建筑划分为三个等级。

澳洲绿色建筑星级评价体系及应用

澳洲绿色建筑星级评价体系及应用 赵辉1,2梅琳1,2 （1. 重庆市建设技术发展中心，重庆400015；2. 重庆市建筑节能中心，重庆，400015）摘要：随着能源、淡水、土地等资源的日益紧缺，人们对生态环境的保护越来越予以重视。目前，中心对澳洲、新西兰城市生态环境建设进行了考察，旨在为改善我市居民生活环境，积极发展绿色建筑提供国外先进技术与经验。本文主要介绍了澳洲绿色建筑评价体系以及实际工程案例，为重庆绿色建筑工作的进一步开展起到指导作用。 关键词：绿色建筑，星级评价，Green Star，NABERS，澳洲 Application and types of green building rating tools in Australia Zhao Hui1,2 May Lynn1,2 (1. Chongqing construction technology development center, Chongqing, 400015, China; 2. Chongqing building energy efficiency center, Chongqing, 400015, China) Abstract:The ecological environment problem gradually becomes a worldwide topic due to the lack of natural resources in the modern society. Nowadays, the author visited Australia and New Zealand for the urban environment in order to establish a suitable residential environment in ChongQing by drawing on their advanced and excellent techniques and experiences. The types of green building rating tools in Australia and several cases were introduced in the investigation. It indicates an explicit orientation for the local green building development. Key words: green building, rating tools, Green Star, NABERS, Australia

中国绿色建筑评价标准发展

中国经贸导刊资源环境 中国绿色建筑评价标准 发展探析 文孙海玲刘会晓 摘要：我国在２００６年６月颁布的绿色建筑评价标准（ＧＢ／Ｔ５０３７８—２００６），标志着我国绿色建筑的发展实现了新的跨越。本文首先对中外绿色建筑评价体系进行了比较。继而对我国绿色建筑评价标准的发展进行了理论分析，并提出了中国绿色建筑评价标准应当改进的方向，对推进我国绿色建筑评价体系的完善有着深远的意义。 关键词：绿色建筑评价体系ＩＥＥＤＧＢＴｏｏｌＣＡＳＢＥＥ 一、前序 绿色建筑是指在建筑的全寿命周期内，最大限度地节约资源（节能、节地、节水、节材）保护环境和减少污染，为人们提供健康、适用和高效的使用空间，与自然和谐共生的建筑①。 据统计，人类从自然界所获得的５０％以上的物质原料用来建造各类建筑及其附属设备。中国作为世界上第二大能源消耗国，建筑能耗占到了总能耗的２７．５％。因而唤起人们对可持续发展建筑的关注，在建筑领域开展绿色建筑的实践有着深刻的意义。 近年来，世界一些发达国家相 继推出了各自的绿色建筑评价体系 框架，其中第一代是以美国为代表的 ＩＥＥＤ（ＬｅａｄｅｒｓｈｉｐｉｎＥｎｅｒｇｙＥｎｖｉｒｏｎ－ ｍｅｎｔａｌＤｅｓｉｇｎ），第二代是以加拿大为 代表的ＧＢＴｏｏｌ（ＧｒｅｅｎＢｕｉｌｄｉｎｇＴｏｏｌ）； 第三代是以日本为代表的ＣＡＳＢＥＥ （ＣｏｍｐｒｅｈｅｎｓｉｖｅＡｓｓｅｓｓｍｅｎｔＳｙｓｔｅｍｆｏｒ ＢｕｉｌｄｉｎｇＥｎｖｉｒｏｎｍｅｎｔａｌＥｆｆｉｃｉｅｎｃｙ）②。 ２００６年６月，我国颁布了《绿色 建筑评价标准》（ＧＢ／Ｔ５０３７８— ２００６），这标志着我国绿色建筑的发 展实现了新的跨越。如何借鉴国外 的绿色建筑评价体系，修正和完善我 国的绿色建筑评价标准？本文在对 中外绿色建筑评价体系进行比较分 析的基础上，对中国绿色建筑评价标 准的发展进行了理论分析，提出了中 国绿色建筑评价标准应当改进的方 向，对于推进我国绿色建筑评价体系 的完善有着深远的意义。 二、中国和国外绿色建筑评价体 系的比较分析 （一）评价对象 中国的《绿色建筑评价标准》将 评价指标分为住宅建筑和公共建筑， 其中公共建筑主要针对办公建筑、商 场、宾馆等，是由政府组织和社会自 愿参加的行为。 相比较而言，美国、加拿大和日 本的评价指标体系针对不同的评价 对象划分得更加详尽、细致，尽可能 满足不同利益相关者的需求。如美 国的ＩＥＥＤ将评价指标分为新建建 筑、楼宇改造工程、商业内部装修、建 筑主体和维护结构、住宅评估、社区 规划与发展评估；加拿大的ＧＢＴｏｏｌ 将评价指标分为办公建筑、集合住 宅、学校建筑和工业建筑；日本的 ＣＡＳＢＥＥ将评价指标细分为新建建 筑、既有建筑、短期使用建筑、改建建 筑等，评价对象更广泛，且政府措施 强硬。 （二）评价指标体系内容 我国《绿色建筑评价标准》的内 容由节地与室外环境、节能与能源利 用、节水与水资源利用、节材与材料 资源利用、室内环境质量、运营管理 （住宅建筑）、全生命周期综合性能 （公共建筑）等内容组成。 美国的绿色建筑评价体系包括 场地设计、水资源、能源与环境、材料 与资源、室内环境质量和创新设计等 内容；加拿大的绿色建筑评价体系包 括能源和资源消耗、环境负担、室内 环境质量、设施质量、经济性能、绿色 2012年12月中107

国内外绿色建筑设计之比较

龙源期刊网 https://www.wendangku.net/doc/f21611116.html, 国内外绿色建筑设计之比较 作者：李玉萍 来源：《青年文学家》2014年第29期 摘要：随着国内旺盛的房地产开发建设热潮和人们对城市住宅环境要求的提高，空中花 园的设计理念被更多的国人所认知。基于此设计理念在市场上受到广泛的欢迎，因而被许多房地产开发商用来进行各种建筑的外观装饰，营造适合绿色建筑环境的空中花园的确是一条改善高层建筑人居环境的合理途径。 关键词：空中绿化；生态；环保 作者简介：李玉萍，辽宁对外经贸学院艺术系教师，副教授职称。 [中图分类号]：[J59] [文献标识码]：A [文章编号]：1002-2139（2014）-29--02 一、绿色建筑的概念 绿色建筑设计是指在建筑物上如屋顶、露台、建筑物立面、阳台等进行绿化装饰设计，也称空中花园设计。国内外常用的绿色建筑概念有：“立体绿化”、“垂直绿墙”、“屋顶绿化”、“攀缘绿化”等。“立体绿化”是各类建筑物的墙体、屋顶露台、天台、檐口、阳台、门、窗及其他各类构筑物、城墙、挡土墙、围墙等进行绿化的统称。“垂直绿墙”是指在城市建筑的墙体上，利用植物的攀缘性、垂枝性或附生性等生物特性，或者在墙体上搭建固定植物附着结构，使绿化在立体空间进行发展的一种方法。“垂直绿墙”它除了有美化及增加绿量作用，更有为建筑降温和隔音的效果“屋顶花园（绿化）”是各类建筑物、构筑物、城围、桥梁（立交桥）等的屋顶、露台、阳台或大型人工假山山体上进行造园，种植树木花草的统称。“攀缘绿化”，就是利用攀缘植物，在墙面、树干、棚架、篱笆及可悬垂之处进行绿化、美化的一种绿化方式。以上各种概念，都包涵平面绿化转向立体绿化的内容，虽在表述和实施上有很大的不同，但目前国内外都有用“空中绿化”这一广义的概念来统称。 二、国外空中绿化概况 世界各地的许多城市都十分重视空中绿化，这也是维护人类日益恶劣的生存环境、降低污染、保持低碳生活的一项举措，为了增加绿地，改善生态环境，各个国家和城市早已开始兴建空中花园。 美国加利福尼亚奥克兰市于1959年在凯泽中心一座六层楼的顶部建造了一个景色秀丽的空中花园。被视为建筑与绿化艺术“杂交”的奇葩。屋顶绿化自1959年在美国获得成功后，技术日渐成熟，目前在欧美等发达国家正呈方兴未艾之势。

绿色建筑评价体系研究论文

绿色建筑的实践毫无疑问是一项高度复杂的系统工程，不仅需要建筑师具有生态环保的理念，并采取相应的设计方法，还需要管理层、业主都具有较强的环保意识。这种多层次合作关系的介入，需要在望个过程中确立明确的评价及认证系统，以定量的方式检测建筑设计生态目标达到的效果，用一定量指标来衡量其所达到的预期环境性能实现的程度。评价系统不仅指导检验绿色建筑实践，同时也为建筑市场提供制约和规范．促使在设计，运行、管理和维护过程中更多考虑环境因素。引导建筑向节能、环保、健康舒适，讲求效益的轨道发展。 近10多年来，世界一些发达国家相继推出了各自不同的建筑环境评价方法、其中英、美、加等国所实施的比较成功的绿色建筑评价体系，值得借鉴。 一、英国建筑研究组织环境评价法（BREEAM） 英国建筑研究组织环境评价法是由英国建统研究组织（BRE）和一些私人部门的研究者最早1990年共同制定的。目的是为绿色建筑实践提供权威性的指导以期减少建筑对全球和地区环境的负面影响。从1990年至今，BREEAM已经发行了<2／91版新建超市及超级商场>、<5／93版新建工业建筑和非食品零售店>，<环境标准3／95版新建住宅>以及< BREEAM’98新建和现有办公建筑＞等多个版本并己对英国的新建办公建筑市场中25％到30％的建筑进行了评估，成为各国类似评估手册中的成功范例， BREEAM’98是为建筑所有者，设计者和使用者设计的评价体系，以评判建筑在其整个寿命周期中，包含从建筑设计开始阶段的选址、设计、施工，使用直至最终报废拆除所有阶段的环境性能，通过对一系列的环境问题，包括建筑对全球、区域、场地和室内环境的影响进行评价，BREEAM最终给予建筑环境标志认证。其评价方法概括如下：首先，BREEAM认为根据建筑项目所处的阶段不同，评价的内容相应也不同。评估的内容包括3个方面：建筑性能、设计建造和运行管理。其中：处于设计阶段、新建成阶段和整修建成阶段的建筑，从建筑性能，设计建造两方面评价，计算BREEAM等级和环境性能指数；属于被使用的现有建筑，或是属于正在被评估的环境管理项目的一部分，从建筑性能、管理和运行两方面评价，计算BREEAM等级和环境性能指数；属于闲置的现有建筑，或只需对结构和相关服务设施进行捡查的建筑，对建筑性能进行评价并计算环境性能指数，无需计算BREEAM等级。 其次，评价条目包括9大方面：管理——总体的政策和规程；健康和舒适——室内和室外环境；能源——能耗和CO2排放；运输——有关场地规划和运输时CO2的排放；水——消耗和渗漏问题；原材料——原料选择及对环境的作用；土地使用——绿地和褐地使用；地区生态——场地的生态价值；污染——(除CO2外的)空气和水污染。每一条目下分若干子条目，各对应不同的得分点，分别从建筑性能，或是设计与建造，或是管理与运行这3个方面对建筑进行评价，满足要求即可得到相应的分数。 最后，合计建筑性能方面的得分点，得出建筑性能分(BPS)，合计设计与建造，管理与运行两大项各自的总分，根据建筑项目用处时间段的不同，计算BPS+设计与建造分或BPS+管理与运行分，得出BREEAM等级的总分；另外由BPS值根据换算表换算出建筑的环境性能指数[EPI]，最终，建筑的环境性能以直观的量化分数给出，根据分值BRE规定了有关BREEAM评价结果的4个等级：合格，良好，优良，优异。同时规定了每个等级下设计与建造、管理与运行的最低限分值。 自1990年首次实施以来，BREEAM系统得到不断的完善和扩展，可操作饺大大提高。基本适应了市场化的要求，至2000年已经评估了超过500个建筑项目。它成为各国类似研究领域的成果典范，受其影响启发，加拿大和澳大利亚出版了各自的BREEAM系统，香港特区政府也颁布了类似的HK-BEAM评价系统。 二、绿色建筑桃战2000(GBC 2000) 绿色建筑挑战(Green Building Challenge)是由加拿大自然资源部(Natural Resources

中国绿色建筑评价体系表

中国绿色建筑评价 体系表 1

中国建筑设计研究院绿色建筑(居住建筑)评价体系 (草稿) 工作室名称: 项目名称: 1/6 2/6 2

3 3/6 资源

4/6 4

5/6

35 dB(A)。楼板和分户墙的空气声计权隔声量不小于45dB,楼板的计权标准化撞击声声压级不大于70dB。户门的空气声计权隔声量不小于30dB。外窗的空气声计权隔声量不小于25dB,沿街时不小于30dB。用建筑热工设计规范>GB50176的要求。 4 居住空间能自然通风,通风开口面积在夏 热冬暖和夏热冬冷地区不小于该房间地 板面积的8%,在其它地区不小于5%。建筑 4 设采暖或空调系统(设备) 的住宅,运行时用户可根据 需要对室温进行调控。 建筑 5 室内游离甲醛、苯、氨、氡和TVOC等 空气污染物浓度符合现行<民用建筑室 内环境污染控制规范>GB50325的规 定。建筑 5 采用可调节外遮阳,防止夏 季太阳辐射透过窗户玻璃 直接进入室内。 建筑 6 设置通风换气装置或室内 空气质量监测装置。 建筑 合 计 完成分项数目: 项完成分项数目: 项完成分项数目: 项6/6 项目序 号 控制项专业序 号 一般项专业序 号 优选项专业是 V 否X 是 V 否X 是 V 否X 运营管理1 制定并实施节能、节 水、节材与绿化管理 制度。 建筑 业主 1 垃圾站(间)设冲洗和排水设 施,存放垃圾能及时清运、不 污染环境、不散发臭味。 建筑 业主 1 可对生物降解垃圾进行单独收集 或设置可生物降解垃圾处理房。 垃圾收集或垃圾处理房设有风道 或排风、冲洗和排水设施,处理 过程无二次污染。 建筑 业主 2 住宅水、电、燃气,采 暖与(或)空调分户、 分类计量与收费。 建筑 业主 2 智能化系统定位正确、采用 的技术先进实用、系统可扩 充性强,能较长时间的满足应 用需求;达到安全防范子系 统、管理与设备监控子系统 与信息网络子系统的基本配 置。 电气 业主 3 制定垃圾管理的制度, 对垃圾物流进行有效 控制,对废品进行分类 收集,防止垃圾无序倾 倒和二次污染。 建筑 3 采用无公害病虫害防治技术, 规范杀虫剂、除草剂、化 肥、农药等化学药品的使用, 有效避免对土壤和地下水环 境的损害。 业主 4 设置密闭的垃圾容器,建筑 4 栽种和移植的树木成活建筑 6

绿色建筑评价标准GB

《绿色建筑评价标准》GB 50378-2006介绍 自2006年6月1日起施行。 一、概述 在建筑的建造和使用过程中，需要消耗大量的自然资源，同时增加环境负荷。据统计，人类从自然界所获得的50%以上的物质原料用来建造各类建筑及其附属设备。这些建筑在建造和使用过程中又消耗了全球能量的50%左右；与建筑有关的空气污染、光污染、电磁污染等占环境总体污染的34%；建筑垃圾占人类活动产生垃圾总量的40%。 绿色建筑的定义:在建筑的全寿命周期内，最大限度地节约资源(节能、节地、节水、节材)、保护环境和减少污染，为人们提供健康、适用和高效的使用空间，与自然和谐共生的建筑。 绿色建筑是将可持续发展理念引入建筑领域的结果，将成为未来建筑的主导趋势。目前，世界各国普遍重视绿色建筑的研究，许多国家和组织都在绿色建筑方面制定了相关政策和评价体系，有的已着手研究编制可持续建筑标准。由于世界各国经济发展水平、地理位置和人均资源等条件不同，对绿色建筑的研究与理解也存在差异。 我国政府从基本国情出发，从人与自然和谐发展，节约能源，有效利用资源和保护环境的角度，提出发展“节能省地型住宅和公共建筑”，主要内容是节能、节地、节水、节材(即“四节”)与环境保护，注重以人为本，强调可持续发展。从这个意义上讲，节能省地型住宅和公共建筑与绿色建筑、可持续建筑提法不同，内涵相通，具有某种一致性，是具有中国特色的绿色建筑和可持续建筑理念。 我国资源总量和人均资源量都严重不足，同时我国的消费增长速度惊人，在资源再生利用率上也远低于发达国家。我国各地区在气候、地理环境、自然资源、经济社会发展水平与民俗文化等方面都存在巨大差异。我国正处于工业化、城镇化加速发展时期。中国现有建筑总面积400多亿平方米，预计到2020年还将新增建筑面积约300亿平方米。在我国发展绿色建筑，是一项意义重大而十分迫切的任务。借鉴国际先进经验，建立一

国外绿色建筑评价体系略览汇总

国外绿色建筑评价体系略览 建筑作为人工环境，它对生态环境的影响是多层次多方面的。其中具有明确生态环保目标和手段的建筑，可以称之为绿色建筑。绿色建筑的概念是当前全球化可持续发展战略在建筑领域的具体体现，由于地域，观念和技术等方面的差异，目前国内外对绿色建筑还缺乏统一约定义，就技术层面而言，绿色建筑应考虑以下关键问题：能源、排放物、水的运用、土地的运用，对地区生态的影响和室内空气质量等同时还应考虑与之相应的建筑的功能性以及建筑美学意义。 绿色建筑的实践毫无疑问是一项高度复杂的系统工程，不仅需要建筑师具有生态环保的理念，并采取相应的想象方法，还需要管理层、业主都具有较强的环保意识。这种多层次合作关系的介入，需要在望个过程中确立明确的评价及认证系统，以定量的方式检测建筑想象生态目标达到的效果，用一定量指标来衡量其所达到的预期环境性能完成的程度。评价系统不仅指导检验绿色建筑实践，同时也为建筑市场提供制约和规范。促使在想象，运行、管理和维护过程中更多考虑环境因素。引导建筑向节能、环保、健康舒适，讲求效益的轨道发展。 近10多年来，世界一些发达国家相继推出了各自不同的建筑环境评价方法、其中英、美、加等国所施行的比较成功的绿色建筑评价体系，值得借鉴。 一、英国建筑研究组织环境评价法（BREEAM） 英国建筑研究组织环境评价法是由英国建统研究组织（BRE）和一些私人部门的研究者最早1990年共同制定的。目的是为绿色建筑实践提供权威性的指导以期减少建筑对全球和地区环境的负面影响。从1990年至今，BREEAM已经发行了<2／91版新建超市及超级商场>、<5／93版新建工业建筑和非食品零售店>，<环境标准3／95版新建住宅>以及< BREEAM‘98新建和现有办公建筑＞等多个版本并己对英国的新建办公建筑市场中25％到30％的建筑进行了评估，成为各国类似评估手册中的成功范例， BREEAM‘98是为建筑所有者，想象者和运用者想象的评价体系，以评判建筑在其整个寿命周期中，包含从建筑想象开始阶段的选址、想象、施工，运用直至最终报废拆除所有阶段的环境性能，通过对一系列的环境问题，包括建筑对全球、区域、场地和室内环境的影响进行评价，BREEAM最终给予建筑环境标志认证。其评价方法概括如下： 首先，BREEAM认为根据建筑项目所处的阶段不同，评价的内容相应也不同。评估的内容包括3个方面：建筑性能、想象建造和运行管理。其中：处于想象阶段、新建成阶段和整修建成阶段的建筑，从建筑性能，想象建造两方面评价，计算 BREEAM等级和环境性能指数；属于被运用的现有建筑，或是属于正在被评估的环境管理项目的一部分，从建筑性能、管理和运行两方面评价，计算BREEAM等级和环境性能指数；属于闲置的现有建筑，或只需对结构和相关

新版绿色建筑评价标准

新版绿色建筑评价 标准 1 2020年4月19日

《绿色建筑评价标准》 GB/T50378- 核心提示：1 总则 1.0.1 为贯彻国家技术经济政策，节约资源，保护环境，规范绿色建筑的评价，推进可持续发展，制定本标准。 1.0.2 本标准适用于绿色民用建筑的评价。 1.0.3 绿色建筑评价应遵循因地制宜的原则，结合建筑所在地 1 总则 1.0.1 为贯彻国家技术经济政策，节约资源，保护环境，规范绿色建筑的评价，推进可持续发展，制定本标准。 1.0.2 本标准适用于绿色民用建筑的评价。 1.0.3 绿色建筑评价应遵循因地制宜的原则，结合建筑所在地域的气候、环境、资源、经济及文化等特点，对 2 2020年4月19日

建筑全寿命期内节能、节地、节水、节材、保护环境等性能进行综合评价。 1.0.4 绿色建筑的评价除应符合本标准的规定外，尚应符合国家现行有关标准的规定。 2 术语 2.0.1 绿色建筑 green building 在全寿命期内，最大限度地节约资源（节能、节地、节水、节材）、保护环境、减少污染，为人们提供健康、适用和高效的使用空间，与自然和谐共生的建筑。 2.0.2 热岛强度 heat island intensity 城市内一个区域的气温与郊区气温的差别，用二者代表性测点气温的差值表示，是城市热岛效应的表征参数。 3 2020年4月19日

2.0.3 年径流总量控制率 volume capture ratio of annual rainfall 经过自然和人工强化的入渗、滞蓄、调蓄和收集回用，场地内累计一年得到控制的雨水量占全年总降雨量的比例。 2.0.4 可再生能源 renewable energy 风能、太阳能、水能、生物质能、地热能和海洋能等非化石能源的统称。 2.0.5 再生水 reclaimed water 污水经处理后，达到规定水质标准、满足一定使用要求的非饮用水。 2.0.6 非传统水源 nontraditional water source 不同于传统地表水供水和地下水供水的水源，包括再生水、雨水、海水等。 4 2020年4月19日