Sci整个投稿英文信

Sci整个投稿英文信

一、最初投稿Cover letter

Dear Editors:

We would like to submit the enclosed manuscript entitled “Paper Title”, which we wish to be considered for publication in “Journal Name”. No conflict of interest exits in the submission of this manuscript, and manuscript is approved by all authors for publication. I would like to declare on behalf of my co-authors that the work described was original research that has not been published previously, and not under consideration for publication elsewhere, in whole or in part. All the authors listed have approved the manuscript that is enclosed.

In this work, we evaluated …… (简要介绍一下论文的创新性). I hope this paper is suitable for “Journal Name”.

The following is a list of possible reviewers for your consideration:

1) Name A E-mail: ××××@××××

2) Name B E-mail: ××××@××××

We deeply appreciate your consideration of our manuscript, and we look forward to receiving comments from the reviewers. If you have any queries, please don’t hesitate to contact me at the address below. Thank you and best regards.

Yours sincerely,

××××××

Corresponding author:

Name: ×××

E-mail: ××××@××××

二、催稿信

Dear Prof. ×××:

Sorry for disturbing you. I am not sure if it is the right time to contact you to inquire about the status of my submitted manuscript titled “Paper Title”. (ID: 文章稿号), although the status of “With Editor” has been lasting for more than two months, since submitted to journal three months ago. I am just wondering that my manuscript has been sent to reviewers or not?

I would be greatly appreciated if you could spend some of your time check the status for us. I am very pleased to hear from you on the reviewer’s comments.

Thank you very much for your consideration.

Best regards!

Yours sincerely,

××××××

Corresponding author:

Name: ×××

E-mail: ××××@××××

三、修改稿Cover letter

Dear Dr/ Prof..（写上负责你文章编辑的姓名，显得尊重，因为第一次的投稿不知道具体负责的编辑，只能用通用的Editors）:

On behalf of my co- authors, we thank you very much for giving us an opportunity to revise our manuscript, we appreciate editor and reviewers very much for their positive and constructive comments and suggestions on our manuscript entitled “Paper Title”. (ID: 文章稿号).

We have studied reviewer’s comments carefully and have made revision which marked in red in the paper. We have tried our best to revise our manuscript according to the comments. Attached please find the

revised version, which we would like to submit for your kind consideration.

We would like to express our great appreciation to you and reviewers for comments on our paper. Looking forward to hearing from you.

Thank you and best regards.

Yours sincerely,

××××××

Corresponding author:

Name: ×××

E-mail: ××××@××××

四、修改稿回答审稿人的意见（最重要的部分）

List of Responses

Dear Editors and Reviewers:

Thank you for your letter and for the reviewers’ comments concerning our manuscript entitled “Paper Title” (ID: 文章稿号). Those comments are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper, as well as the important guiding significance to our

researches. We have studied comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with approval. Revised portion are marked in red in the paper. The main corrections in the paper and the responds to the reviewer’s comments are as flowing:

Responds to the reviewer’s comments:

Reviewer #1:

1. Respon se to comment: (……简要列出意见……)

Response: ××××××

2. Response to comment: (……简要列出意见……)

Response: ××××××

。。。。。。

逐条意见回答，切忌一定不能有遗漏

针对不同的问题有下列几个礼貌术语可适当用用：

We are very sorry for our negligence of ……...

We are very sorry for our incorrect writing ……...

It is really true as Reviewer suggested that……

We have made correction according to the Reviewer’s comments.

We have re-written this part according to the Reviewer’s suggestion As Reviewer suggested that……

Considering the Reviewer’s suggestion, we have ……

最后特意感谢一下这个审稿人的意见：

Special thanks to you for your good comments.

Reviewer #2:

同上述

Reviewer #3:

××××××

Other changes:

1. Line 60-61, the statements of “……” were corrected as “…………”

2. Line 107, “……” was added

3. Line 129, “……” was deleted

××××××

We tried our best to improve the manuscript and made some changes in the manuscript. These changes will not influence the content and framework of the paper. And here we did not list the changes but marked in red in revised paper.

We appreciate for Editors/Reviewers’ warm work earnestly, and hope that the correction will meet with approval.

Once again, thank you very much for your comments and suggestions.

五、文章接受后可以考虑感谢一下负责你文章的编辑或主编（根据需要）

Dear Prof. ××××××:

Thanks very much for your kind work and consideration on publication of our paper. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our

great appreciation to editor and reviewers.

Thank you and best regards.

Yours sincerely,

××××××

Corresponding author:

Name: ×××

E-mail: ××××@××××

六、询问校稿信件（如果文章接受后时间较长）

Dear ×××:

Sorry for disturbing you. I am not sure if it is the right time to contact you to inquire about the status of our accepted manuscript titled “Paper Title” (ID: 文章稿号), since the copyright agreement for publication has been sent to you two months ago. I am just wondering that how long I can receive the proof of our manuscript from you?

I would be greatly appreciated if you could spend some of your time for

a reply. I am very pleased to hear from you.

Thank you very much for your consideration.

Yours sincerely,

××××××

Corresponding author:

Name: ×××

E-mail: ××××@××××

七、文章校稿信件

Dear Mr. ×××:

Thanks very much for your kind letter about the proof of our paper titled “Paper Title” (ID: 文章稿号) for publication in “Journal Name”. We have finished the proof reading and checking carefully, and some corrections about the proof and the answers to the queries are provided below.

Corrections:

1. In ****** should be **** (Page ***, Right column, line***)

2. In **** the “*****” should be “****” (Page ****, Right column,

line****)

Answers for “author queries”:

1. *********************.

2. **********************

3. **********************

We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know.

Thank you and best regards.

Yours sincerely,

××××××Corresponding author: Name: ×××

E-mail: ××××@×××

SCISSCI 投稿过程总结

SCI投稿过程总结、投稿状态解析、修稿处理、拒稿后对策及接受后总结等（一）投稿前准备工作和需要注意的事项、投稿过程相关经验总结 投稿前准备工作和需要注意的事项： 总结提示语：1)第一作者和通信作者的区别： 通信作者（Corresponding author)通常是实际统筹处理投稿和承担答复审稿意见等工作的主导者，也常是稿件所涉及研究工作的负责人。 通信作者的姓名多位列于论文作者名单的最后（使用符号来标识说明是Corresponding author)，但其贡献不亚于论文的第一作者。 通讯作者往往指课题的总负责人，负责与编辑部的一切通信联系和接受读者的咨询等。 文章的成果是属于通讯作者的，说明思路是通讯作者的，而不是第一作者。 第一作者仅代表是你做的，且是最主要的参与者！ 通信作者标注名称：Corresponding author，To whom correspondence should be addressed,或The person to whom inquiries regarding the paper should be addressed 若两个以上的作者在地位上是相同的，可以采取“共同第一作者”（joint first author)的署名方式，并说明These authors contributed equally to the work。 2)作者地址的标署： 尽可能地给出详细通讯地址，邮政编码。有二位或多位作者，则每一不同的地址应按之中出现的先后顺序列出，并以相应上标符号的形式列出与相应作者的关系。 如果第一作者不是通讯作者，作者应该按期刊的相关规定表达，并提前告诉编辑。期刊大部分以星号（*）、脚注或者致谢形式标注通讯联系人。

怎样投稿SCI期刊

English Editing Service: https://www.wendangku.net/doc/f6267174.html, How to Submit a Research Paper to a Journal In the later stages of your doctoral studies in Mathematics, one of the important things you will need to do is to submit one or more papers to research journals for possible publication. You should do this as soon as your dissertation adviser tells you that your research is ready for publication, but not before! If you are co-authoring a paper with your adviser, then he or she may be handling the submission details as the senior co-author. If so, ask your adviser to use the submission process to teach you how it is done, so you will be able to do this yourself in the future. However, if you are submitting a paper as the sole or senior author, then you will need know how to handle this process yourself. Over the years, there have been advanced graduate students who could have benefited from some general advice about the submission process. This letter has been written in the hope that you will navigate the publication process smoothly. Remember that any papers based on your dissertation research should include a grateful acknowledgment - either in the introductory section, as a footnote, or at the end. State that this work is part of your doctoral dissertation at Louisiana State University and thank your adviser. Your acknowledgment of the role of your doctoral adviser may help to insure that a journal editor takes your work seriously, since it has at least passed the scrutiny of your adviser. If other mathematicians have helped, thank them too. Most mathematicians are generous about sharing their ideas, but they will surely notice and remember if you fail to acknowledge them. This is good advice to remember for the future as well. You should give careful thought to your paper's introduction. The introduction to your paper should explain clearly what your main results are and why they are interesting or important. The introduction should tell your audience how your mathematical work is related to recent research in the area. It is very important to properly reference these works. A referee for your paper may be chosen from among the researchers whose work you cite. You would like the introduction to motivate readers to read more. Read the introductions from leading researchers in your area to give you ideas about what you should include in your introduction. Ask your adviser read your entire paper and listen carefully to his or her suggestions. It takes much experience to know how to write well for a research journal. It is likely that you will need to go through several thorough revisions before your adviser is pleased with your writing. Expect this to happen and learn from the process. It will benefit you for years to come. It is important that your paper be sent to referees with current expertise in the field of your research. With this in mind, the first thing to do is to ask your adviser to suggest a suitable journal and a suitable editor to whom to send your paper. Your adviser may know that a certain journal is an active venue for publication in your field. Before you and your adviser make a final choice of the journal to which you will submit your paper, you may be well-advised to check the backlog of the journals that you are considering. Especially during the early years of your career, you may have a practical need to get several papers into print without very long delays.Backlog information is often available at the journals' websites, as explained below. Another useful type of information which is available is the Mathematics Citation Quotient(the ratio of the number citations to the number of papers in a given journal) which is available on MathSciNet through any LSU campus computer,or from home through PAWS and the LSU Library resources.For instance, in 2004 the MCQ of Transactions of the AMS is listed at a bit more than 0.6, whereas for the Journal of the AMS it is above 2. Another citation index is available through the LSU Library. From the LSU Libraries Indexes and Databases page, which is available through your PAWS account even from home, select Web of Knowledge in the Frequently Used Databases menu.Then select Journal Citation Reports from the menu at the top of the ISI Web of Knowledge page. Many journals have websites, which you should visit to read their instructions for authors. For example the AMS Journals use this page: Information for Authors. Here is a link to a page for Transactions of the American Mathematical Society: Submissions to Transactions. You will note

SCI英文论文审稿意见汇总

英文论文审稿意见汇总 以下12点无轻重主次之分。每一点内容由总结性标题和代表性审稿人意见构成。1、目标和结果不清晰。 It is noted that your manuscript needs careful editing by someone with expertise in technical English editing paying particular attention to English grammar, spelling, and sentence structure so that the goals and results of the study are clear to the reader. 2、未解释研究方法或解释不充分。 ◆In general, there is a lack of explanation of replicates and statistical me thods used in the study. ◆Furthermore, an explanation of why the authors did these various experiments should be provided. 3、对于研究设计的rationale: Also, there are few explanations of the rationale for the study design. 4、夸张地陈述结论/夸大成果/不严谨： The conclusions are overstated. For example, the study did not show if the side effects from initial copper burst can be avoid with the polymer formulation. 5、对hypothesis的清晰界定： A hypothesis needs to be presented。 6、对某个概念或工具使用的rationale/定义概念： What was the rationale for the film/SBF volume ratio? 7、对研究问题的定义： Try to set the problem discussed in this paper in more clear, write one section to define the problem 8、如何凸现原创性以及如何充分地写literature review: The topic is novel but the application proposed is not so novel. 9、对claim,如A＞B的证明，verification: There is no experimental comparison of the algorithm with previously known work, so it is impossible to judge whether the algorithm is an improvement on previous work. ：题问度谨严、10． MNQ is easier than the primitive PNQS, how to prove that. 11、格式（重视程度）： ◆In addition, the list of references is not in our style. It is close but not completely correct. I have attached a pdf file with Instructions for Authors which shows examples. ◆Before submitting a revision be sure that your material is properly prepared

SCI投稿全攻略

SCI投稿过程总结、投稿状态解析、拒稿后处理对策及接受后期相关问答综合荟萃目录 （重点是一、二、四、五、六）： （一）投稿前准备工作和需要注意的事项、投稿过程相关经验总结 （二）SCI期刊投稿各种状态详解及实例综合（学习各种投稿状态+投稿经历总结） （三）问答综合篇（是否催稿、如何撤稿、一稿两投及学术不端相关内容等） （四）如何处理审稿意见（回复意见、补实验、润色、重整数据、作图及调整、申辩及其他）（五）Reject 或者Reject and resubmit后的对策和处理 （六）稿件接受后期相关问题（作者信息、地址版权、单行本、彩图费、版面费、如何汇款、清样相关等） （七）进阶篇（如何选投SCI杂志、各专业方向期刊选择、SCI写作经验） （一）投稿前准备工作和需要注意的事项、投稿过程相关经验总结 1)第一作者和通信作者的区别： 通信作者（Corresponding author)通常是实际统筹处理投稿和承担答复审稿意见等工作的主导者，也常是稿件所涉及研究工作的负责人。 通信作者的姓名多位列于论文作者名单的最后（使用符号来标识说明是Corresponding author)，但其贡献不亚于论文的第一作者。 通讯作者往往指课题的总负责人，负责与编辑部的一切通信联系和接受读者的咨询等。 文章的成果是属于通讯作者的，说明思路是通讯作者的，而不是第一作者。 第一作者仅代表是你做的，且是最主要的参与者！ 通信作者标注名称：Corresponding author，To whom correspondence should be addressed,或The person to whom inquiries regarding the paper should be addressed.若两个以上的作者在地位上是相同的，可以采取“共同第一作者”（joint first author)的署名方式，并说明These authors contributed equally to the work。 2)作者地址的标署： 尽可能地给出详细通讯地址，邮政编码。有二位或多位作者，则每一不同的地址应按之中出现的先后顺序列出，并以相应上标符号的形式列出与相应作者的关系。 如果第一作者不是通讯作者，作者应该按期刊的相关规定表达，并提前告诉编辑。期刊大部分以星号（*）、脚注或者致谢形式标注通讯联系人。 3)挑选审稿人的几个途径： 很多SCI杂志都需要作者自己提出该篇论文的和您研究领域相关的审稿人，比较常见的是三名左右，也有的杂志要求5-8人。 介绍几个方法： ①利用SCI、SSCI、A&HCI、ISTP检索和您研究相关的科学家； ②文章中的参考文献； ③相关期刊编委或学术会议的主席、委员； ④以前发表的类似文章的审稿人； ⑤询问比较熟识的一些专业人士； ⑥交叉审稿，邀请以前的作者； ⑦若是团队序贯研究，斟酌考虑自建期刊审稿人专家库。 PS: 如果有熟悉的同领域的专家，可以推荐一两位为宜（若你全部推荐熟人也无可厚非，但编辑基本不会全部考虑，可能对你还有点特殊“眼色”了）。考虑推荐自己文章的参考文献作者较为常用，当然，如果你是负面引用的话，务必慎重了。

SCI期刊投稿各阶段状态解读及应对

SCI投稿状态详解及应对策略 紫雪整编 1.Submitted to Journal投稿 投稿流程一般如下：杂志官网首页，打开submit paper，以通讯作者的身份register 一个账号，然后以author login身份登录，按照提示依次完成：Select Article Type、Enter Title、Add/Edit/Remove Authors、Submit Abstract、Enter Keywords、Select Classifications、Enter Comments、Request Editor、Attach Files，最后下载pdf，确保无误后，方可到投稿主页approve submission或直接submit。 提示： 1)大多数期刊要求以word投稿，但也有要求用pdf格式的，务必细看稿约。 2)文献格式是否按拟投杂志标准要求核准？因为有的投稿系统是可以直接检查的。 3)很多系统要求作者勾选同意如伦理道德的声明文件 4)提交后可能会有一个小栏目提示对提交图片的质量做初步审查（不合格的最好重新作图再上传） 5)绝大多数投稿完成后需要最终确认（approve submission），所生成的pdf全文是否满意、合格，也是作者投稿完成前最后一次检查的机会。PS：有的新手可能忽略这点，提交后就以为自己投稿成功，殊不知并未投稿成功。 2.Manuscript received by Editorial Office文章送达，证明投稿成功。 3.With editor 若投稿时未要求选择编辑，则先到主编处，主编会分派给副主编或者其他编辑。这当中会出现另外两个状态： 3.1Awaiting Editor Assignment指派责任编辑。注：Editor assigned是把你的文章分给一个编辑处理了。 3.2Editor Declined Invitation 如果编辑接手处理了就会邀请审稿人了。 提示：一般情况下，投稿（submit）状态后一个星期内会出现编辑处理稿件（with editor）这个状态。很多老外编辑很不能理解中国人喜欢催稿，绝大多数情况下，他们不会像国内某些期刊一样能拖上一年半载再给屁大点修回意见。要适当给编辑一点时间处理，他们也很忙的。不要轻易催稿，也有人因为催稿而立马收到杯具消息——不知是编辑不耐烦了，还是一种巧合。当然，如果submit四周后网上投稿系统还没出现with editor状态信息，就要询问主编了，要注意使用委婉用语，不过也有期刊没有with editor状态。 4. With editor后送审可能出现的两种状态（Decision Letter Being Prepared或Reviewers invited）： 提示： 4.1 Decision Letter Being Prepared 就是编辑没找审稿人就自己决定了，一般情况下比较悲剧。一可能是英文太差，需要语言润色。二可能是内容太差。 4.1 Reviewer(s) invited 找到审稿人了，就开始审稿 5. Under review审稿中，此过程的等待较为漫长。

分享两篇SCI论文被接收心得!

分享两篇SCI论文被接收心得! 做为研究生,不可否认sci论文在大家心目的地位,三年的硕士,或者再三年的博士,我们一直开为之奋斗着,痛苦着,快乐着.而一些诸如submit,under review,reject,minor revision or major revision的字眼则时刻牵动着我们那脆弱而且不自信的心.当稿件投出以后，想必你也像我一样每天不停的刷新邮件，而最害怕的莫过于看到"i regret to have to inform you that......."这样的消息了. 回想自己的点滴，以及最近小小的成功，我觉得我有必要，也有义务向各位朋友们分享. 硕博连读的第三年，具体说来是XX年初，我的两篇scｉ论文先后被接收了，下面我想回忆一下两篇论文投稿以及被接收的过程.第一篇： 杂志：talanta（２.８分） received at editorial office: 18-sep-XX article revised: 15-jan-XX article accepted for publication: 18-jan-XX 专业：生物分析化学类 说起这篇文章，可是让我痛苦了一整年，实验很多，做的很辛苦，数据相对繁多，由于这是我第一篇文章，写作方面也是摸石头过河，逐句的模仿.为了写这篇文章，我仔细研读了该领域的大约１００篇文献，对别人写的好的句子，类似的句子都做了标记，在写作的过程中想起要表达什么意思的时候马上随时翻阅，这样下来，每天写一小段，有时候甚至每天就写那么几小句，大约一个月后，我发现一篇包含abstract,intrduction,experiment,results and discussion初稿居然完成了.

SCIcoveringletter及投稿经验总结

Dr. XU Jianhe The State Key Laboratory of Bioreactor Engineering East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, China Tel: +86-21-64252498; Fax: +86-21-64252250 Elsevier 投稿各种状态总结 1. Submitted to Journal当上传结束后，显示的状态是Submitted to Journal，这个状态是自然形成的无需处理。 2. With editor如果在投稿的时候没有要求选择编辑，就先到主编那，主编会分派给别的编辑。这当中就会有另两个状态： 3. Editor assigned 4. Editor Declined Invitation 如果编辑接手处理了就会邀请审稿人了。 5. Reviewer(s) invited 如果审稿人接受那就会是以下状态： 6. Under review 这应该是一个漫长的等待。当然前面各步骤也可能很慢的，要看编辑的处理情况。 如果被邀请审稿人不想审，就会decline，编辑会重新邀请别的审稿人。 7. required review completed 审稿结束，等编辑处理。 8. Decision in Process到了这一步就快要有结果了，编辑开始考虑是给修改还是直接拒，当然也有可能直接接受的，但可能性很小，呵呵。 9. Minor revision/Major revision这个时候可以稍微庆祝一下了，问题不大了，因为有修改就有可能。具体怎么改就不多说了，谦虚谨慎是不可少的。 10. Revision Submitted to Journal 又开始了一个循环。 11. Accepted如果不要再审，只是小修改，编辑看后会马上显示这个状态，但如果要再审也会有上面的部分状态。一步会比较快，但也有慢的。看杂志的。 还有个状态是Rejected。希望不要出现。 其他库的状态，基本是大同小异，供参考： In the Rapid Review? system, your manuscript has a different status assigned to it at various stages in the process. Below is a list of the status descriptions used

SCI期刊投稿各种状态详解及实例综合

SCI期刊投稿各种状态详解及实例综合（学习各种投稿状态+投稿经历总结） 1.SubmittedtoJournal?刚提交的状态——新手请看这里！！！ 一般的步骤是这样的：网上投稿-Submitamanuscript：先到每个杂志的首页，打开submitpaper 一栏，先以通讯作者的身份register一个账号，然后以authorlogin身份登录，按照提示依次完成：SelectArticleType、EnterTitle、Add/Edit/RemoveAuthors、SubmitAbstract、EnterKeywords、SelectClassifications、EnterComments、RequestEditor、AttachFiles，最后下载pdf，查看无误后，即可到投稿主页approvesubmission或直接submitit。? 总结提示语：对于投稿之前和提交确认投稿过程，这里还需要对投稿新手强调以下几点。因为这些小问题被编辑评个低印象分不划算，被打回也浪费了时间和精力。一条条说来： 1)大多数系统是要求word投稿正文内容的，pdf多不为接受格式。但也有很少数要求用pdf格式的，务必注意细看稿约。 2)文献格式是否按拟投杂志标准要求核准？有的投稿系统是可以直接检查的。 3)引用文献条数是否符合该杂志要求？有的杂志不特别要求，有的还是非常重视的。如我之前投shock杂志，编辑和一位审稿人都提到参考文献不要超过35条。如果你文章写完后，能够适当精简文献条数，那么，请删减几条吧。 4)很多系统要求勾选同意一些如伦理道德的声明文件 5)提交后可能会有一个小栏目提示对提交图片的质量做了初步审查（不合格的最好重新作图再上传） 6)绝大多数投稿完成后需要viewsubmission和最后确认（approvesubmission）。viewsubmission 就是要求你再整体看看投稿填写的这些资料信息+coverletter+正文+图片表格，所生成的pdf全文是否满意、合格，也是你投稿完成前最后一次检查的机会了。 PS：有的新手可能不注意这点，提交后就不管了，还开开心心以为自己投稿成功，殊不知结果邮箱里一直没有收到投稿后的邮件回执和稿号，直到最后纳闷几天了才回去看系统状态。 2.ManuscriptreceivedbyEditorialOffice文章到了编辑手里了，证明投稿成功 3.Witheditor?若投稿时未要求选择编辑，则先到主编处，主编会分派给副主编或者其他编辑。这当中就会有另两个状态：? I)AwaitingEditorAssignment指派责任编辑? II)Editorassigned是把你的文章分给一个编辑处理了。? III)EditorDeclinedInvitation如果编辑接手处理了就会邀请审稿人了。? 总结提示语：一般情况下，投稿（submit）状态后一个星期内会出现编辑处理稿件（witheditor）这个状态。很多老外编辑很不能理解中国人喜欢催稿，绝大多数情况下，他们不会像国内某些期刊一样能拖上一年半载再给屁大点修回意见。要适当给编辑一点时间处理，他们也很忙的。不要轻易催稿，也有人因为催稿而立马收到杯具消息——不知是编辑不耐烦了，还是一种巧合。当然，如果submit四个星期后网上投稿系统还没出现witheditor状态信息，就要询问主编了，要注意委婉用语。不过要注意，也有期刊没有witheditor状态。

SCI论文投稿经验!

SCI论文投稿经验！ 2009年，我代表本课题组共投递7篇SCI论文（主要是生殖和神经方向），分别投往IF2.5—10分的杂志，经历了许多坎坷。不过，现在可喜的是已经accept了5篇，均在3分左右，revised 了2篇。在修稿和投稿过程中，本人学习了不少相关知识和积累了一些经验，现与各位战友 分享，并请大家批评指正。 内容清单： 1、本人2009年SCI投稿经验总结（含SCI投稿程序） 2、本版众多投稿相关精华帖汇聚 3、众多战友的2009年投稿经历汇总 一、本人2009年SCI论文投稿步骤及其经验总结 （一）投稿程序 1、选择合适的SCI期刊-Choose a journal。结合专业知识、2008或2007年度影响因子 表和他人经验来综合选择要投递的期刊，并进入该期刊查询系统查询近年来的文章走向。 2、下载Introduction for submission。只要到每个杂志的首页，打开submit paper一栏，点击Introduction查看或下载即可。 3、稿件及其相关材料准备-Preparation：Manuscript.doc、Tables.doc、Figures.tiff（jpg 等）、Cover letter，有时还有Title page、Copyright agreement、Conflicts of interest等。 4、网上投稿-Submit a manuscript：先到每个杂志的首页，打开submit paper一栏，先 以通讯作者的身份register一个账号，然后以author login身份登录，按照提示依次完成：Select Article Type、Enter Title、Add/Edit/Remove Authors、Submit Abstract、Enter Keywords、Select Classifications、Enter Comments、Request Editor、Attach Files，最后下载pdf，查看无误后，即可到投稿主页approve submission或直接submit it。 5、不定期关注稿件状态-Status：Submit New Manuscript、Submissions Sent Back to Author、Icomplete Submissions、Sbmissions Waiting for Author's Approval、Submissions Being Processed、Submissions Needing Revision、Rvisions Sent Back to Author、Icomplete Submissions Being Revised、Risions Waiting for Author's Approval、Revisions Being Processed、Declined Revisions。 6、修回稿的投递-Submitted the revised manuscript：主要修改revised manuscript、response to the reviewers、cover letter，还有其他修改的相关材料。程序是进入投稿主页main menu，点击revise，仍然按照原先程序投递（近似于4），切记把修改的标题、摘要和回复信等内容要修改。最后上传附件时，先把留下来且未修改的材料前打钩（表示留下不变），然 后点击next，再上传已经修改的材料（主要包括revised manuscript、response to the reviewers、cover letter等），最后下载pdf，查看无误后，即可到投稿主页approve submission或直接submit it。

(完整word版)分享SCI写作经验和一些工具

分享SCI写作经验和一些工具 这是一个一年三篇IF大于7的牛人说如何做研究和写论文一、研究生必备四本俗话说好记性不如烂笔头，所以一定要首先养成做笔记的好习惯！作为研究生下面这几个本子是必不可少的：1，实验记录本（包括试验准备本），这当然首当其冲必不可少，我就不多说了；2，Idea记录本，每次看文献对自己有用的东西先记下，由此产生的idea更不能放过，这可是做研究的本钱，好记性不如烂笔头，以后翻翻会更有想法的；3，专业概念以及理论进展记录本，每个人不可能对自己领域的概念都了如指掌，初入门者更是如此，这时候小小一个本子的作用就大了；4，讲座记录本，这本本子可能有些零杂，记录听到的内容，更要记录瞬间的灵感，以及不懂的地方，不可小视！这四本是你必不可少的，不过作为我们这些非英语专业的研究生来说，还有一个应该具备的本子就是英语好句记录本。二、论文写作要点1、选题要小，开掘要深；不要题目很大，内容却很单薄。2、写作前要读好书、翻阅大量资料、注意学术积累，在这个过程中，还要注重利用网络，特别是一些专业数据库；3、“选题新、方法新、资料新”的三新原则（老板教导的）；4、“新题新做”和“小题大做”;总之，一点之见即成文。三、如何撰写实验研究论文（唐朝枢）论文发表意识：基础研究成果的表达方

式；是否急于发表（创新与严谨的关系）；发表的论文与学位论文的区别（反映科学事实而不是反映作者水平）论文格式：原著、快报、简报、摘要。不同于教科书、讲义，更不同于工作总结。撰写前的准备工作：复习和准备好相关文献;再次审定实验目的(学术思想,Idea);实验资料完整并再次 审核1. Introduction: 问题的提出；研究的现状及背景；以前工作基础；本工作的目的；思路（可提假说）；对象；方法；结果。在…模型上，观察…指标，以探讨…（目的）。 2. M & M ⑴材料的写法和意义; 伦理. ⑵程序与指标。操作程序：能序贯，可操作性；方法：多指标方法的排序；引出参照文献简述;改良之处；哪些详或简？⑶统计学处理 3. Results ⑴指标归类描述，忌流水帐。不分析不解释，但要体现思路；⑵文字、图、表相对独立，但避免重复；⑶避免统计错误：对照，均衡，随即，重复。计量-计数、绝对值-相对值、专一指标—综合指标的转换。盲判与非盲判。技术资料直接概率法与卡方检验；多组资料与两组资料；等级相关与直线相关；多因素与单因素分析；配对资料与独立样本资料；非正态分布资料；例数不当；平行管，混合样本；突出差异（绝对值，Δ值，变化％；联合×、÷比值，分亚组等）有效位数的保留。统计学结论与专业结论。4. Discussion ⑴背景材料：展开问题的提出；有关本研究的一些基本知识内容（不要离题太远）；⑵本实验结

辑思编译：SCI论文投稿步骤

辑思编译:SCI论文投稿步骤 当科研新手们写出一篇论文准备投稿SCI时，往往却为怎样遵守SCI论文的投稿步骤以及如何避免发表SCI论文的主要问题而发愁，在此小编参考多方资料特此总结出以下SCI论文投稿步骤，与您一同分享。 1、选择合适的SCI期刊-Choose a journal。结合专业知识、2018或2017年度影响因子表和他人经验来综合选择要投递的期刊，并进入该期刊查询系统查询近年来的文章走向。 2、下载Introduction for submission。只要到每个杂志的首页，打开submit paper一栏，点击Introduction查看或下载即可。 3、稿件及其相关材料准备-Preparation：Manu.doc、Tables.doc、Figures.tiff(jpg等)、Cover letter，有时还有Title page、Copyright agreement、Conflicts of interest等。 4、网上投稿-Submit a manu：先到每个杂志的首页，打开submit paper一栏，先以通讯作者的身份register一个账号，然后以author login身份登录，按照提示依次完成：Select Article Type、Enter Title、Add/Edit/Remove Authors、Submit Abstract、Enter Keywords、Select Classifications、Enter Comments、Request Editor、Attach Files，最后下载pdf，查看无误后，即可到投稿主页approve submission或直接submit it。

SCI期刊投稿各种状态详解及实例综合

to Journal刚提交的状态——新手请看这里！！！ 一般的步骤是这样的：网上投稿-Submit a manuscript：先到每个杂志的首页，打开submit paper 一栏，先以通讯作者的身份register一个账号，然后以author login身份登录，按照提示依次完成：Select Article Type、Enter Title、Add/Edit/Remove Authors、Submit Abstract、Enter Keywords、Select Classifications、Enter Comments、Request Editor、Attach Files，最后下载pdf，查看无误后，即可到投稿主页approve submission或直接submit it。 总结提示语：对于投稿之前和提交确认投稿过程，这里还需要对投稿新手强调以下几点。因为这些小问题被编辑评个低印象分不划算，被打回也浪费了时间和精力。一条条说来： 1)大多数系统是要求word投稿正文内容的，pdf多不为接受格式。但也有很少数要求用pdf格式的，务必注意细看稿约。 2)文献格式是否按拟投杂志标准要求核准？有的投稿系统是可以直接检查的。 3)引用文献条数是否符合该杂志要求？有的杂志不特别要求，有的还是非常重视的。如我之前投shock杂志，编辑和一位审稿人都提到参考文献不要超过35条。如果你文章写完后，能够适当精简文献条数，那么，请删减几条吧。 4)很多系统要求勾选同意一些如伦理道德的声明文件 5)提交后可能会有一个小栏目提示对提交图片的质量做了初步审查（不合格的最好重新作图再上传） 6)绝大多数投稿完成后需要view submission和最后确认（approve submission）。view submission 就是要求你再整体看看投稿填写的这些资料信息+cover letter+正文+图片表格，所生成的pdf全文是否满意、合格，也是你投稿完成前最后一次检查的机会了。 PS：有的新手可能不注意这点，提交后就不管了，还开开心心以为自己投稿成功，殊不知结果邮箱里一直没有收到投稿后的邮件回执和稿号，直到最后纳闷几天了才回去看系统状态。 received by Editorial Office文章到了编辑手里了，证明投稿成功 editor 若投稿时未要求选择编辑，则先到主编处，主编会分派给副主编或者其他编辑。这当中就会有另两个状态： I)Awaiting Editor Assignment指派责任编辑 II)Editor assigned是把你的文章分给一个编辑处理了。 III)Editor Declined Invitation 如果编辑接手处理了就会邀请审稿人了。 总结提示语：一般情况下，投稿（submit）状态后一个星期内会出现编辑处理稿件（with editor）这个状态。很多老外编辑很不能理解中国人喜欢催稿，绝大多数情况下，他们不会像国内某些期刊一样能拖上一年半载再给屁大点修回意见。要适当给编辑一点时间处理，他们也很忙的。不要轻易催稿，也有人因为催稿而立马收到杯具消息——不知是编辑不耐烦了，还是一种巧合。当然，如果submit四个星期后网上投稿系统还没出现with editor状态信息，就要询问主编了，要注意委婉用语。不过要注意，也有期刊没有with editor状态。 参考链接—— 【求助】投ATS近5周了，没音讯，焦虑 【求助】小修后with editor七周,催稿成功（附催稿信） 【求助】催稿信发给谁--催稿信发送成功，稿子被拒 【求助】第一次投稿phytochemistry，revised 之后一个月了还是显示with editor 【求助】投稿一个月后under review显示的时间变了，求大侠指点怎么回事

SCI收录期刊英文投稿全过程英文信件模板一览

SCI收录期刊英文投稿全过程英文信件模板一览 一、最初投稿Cover letter Dear Editors: We would like to submit the enclosed manuscript entitled “Paper Title”, which we wish to be considered for publication in “Journal Name”. No conflict of interest exits in the submission of this manuscript, and manuscript is approved by all authors for publication. I would like to declare on behalf of my co-authors that the work described was original research that has not been published previously, and not under consideration for publication elsewhere, in whole or in part. All the authors listed have approved the manuscript that is enclosed. In this work, we evaluated …… (简要介绍一下论文的创新性). I hope this paper is suitable for “Journal Name”. The following is a list of possible reviewers for your consideration: 1) Name A E-mail: ××××@×××× 2) Name B E-mail: ××××@×××× We deeply appreciate your consideration of our manuscript, and we look forward to receiving comments from the reviewers. If you have any queries, please don’t hesitate to contact me at the address below.