exercise for summary

Distinguish between main and subsidiary information. Delete most details and examples, unimportant information, anecdotes, examples, illustrations, data etc. Simplify the text. Reduce complex sentences to simple sentences, simple sentences to phrases, phrases to single words.

a.People whose professional activity lies in the field of politics are not, on

the whole, conspicuous for their respect for factual accuracy.

Politicians often lie.

b.Failure to assimilate an adequate quantity of solid food over an extended

period of time is absolutely certain to lead, in due course, to a fatal conclusion.

Lack of food causes death.

c.The climatic conditions prevailing in the British Isles show a pattern of

alternating and unpredictable periods of dry and wet weather, accompanied by a similarly irregular cycle of temperature changes.

British weather is changeable.

d.It is undeniable that the large majority of non-native learners of English

experience a number of problems in attempting to master the phonetic patterns of the language.

Many learners find English pronunciation difficult.

e.Tea, whether of the China or Indian variety, is well known to be high on

the list of those beverages which are most frequently drunk by the inhabitants of the British Isles.

The British drink a large amount of tea.

f.It is not uncommon to encounter sentences which, though they contain a

great number of words and are constructed in a highly complex way, none the less turn out on inspection to convey very little meaning of any kind.

Some long and complicated sentences mean very little.

g.One of the most noticeable phenomena in any big city, such as London

or Paris, is the steadily increasing number of petrol-driven vehicles, some in private ownership, others belonging to the public transport system, which congest the roads and render rapid movement more difficult year by year.

Big cities have growing traffic problems.

英文summary写作范例

Article Children Must be Taught to Tell Right from Wrong William Kilpatrick Many of today 's young people have a difficult time seeing any moral dimension （ 道德层 面 ） to their actions. There are a number of reasons why that 's true, but none more prominent than a failed system of education that eschews （ 回避 ） teaching children the traditional moral values that bind Americans together as a society and a culture. That failed approach, called “decision - making, ” was introduced in schools 25 years ago. It tells children to decide for themselves what is right and what is wrong. It replaced “character education. （ 品格教 育 ）” Character education didn 't ask children to reinvent the moral wheel （ 浪费时间重新发明早已存 在的道德标准）; instead, it encouraged them to practice habits of courage, justice and self-control. In the 1940s, when a character education approach prevailed, chewing gum; today they worry about robbery and rape. Decision-making curriculums pose thorny （ 棘手的 ） ethical dilemmas to students, with the impression that all morality is problematic and that all questions of right and wrong are in dispute. Youngsters are forced to question values and virtues they 've never acquired in the first place or upon which they have only a tenuous （ 薄弱的 ） hold. The assumption behind this method is that students will arrive at good moral conclusions if only they are given the chance. But the actual result is moral confusion. For example, a recent national study of 1,700 sixth- to ninth-graders revealed that a majority of boys considered rape to be acceptable under certain conditions. Astoundingly, many of the girls agreed. This kind of moral illiteracy is further encouraged by values-education （价值观教育 ） programs that are little more than courses in self-esteem （ 自尊 ）. These programs are based on the questionable assumption that a child who feels good about himself or herself won 't want to do anything wrong. But it is just as reasonable to make an opposite assumption: namely, that a child who has uncritical self-regard w ill conclude that he or she can 't do anything bad. Such naive self-acceptance results in large part from the non-directive （ 无指导性的 ）, non-judgmental （ 无是非观的 ）, as-long-as-you-feel-comfortable-with-your-choices mentality （ 思 想） that has pervaded （ 渗透） public education for the last two and one-half decades. Many of today 's drug education, sex education and values -education courses are based on the same 1960s philosophy that helped fuel the explosion in teen drug use and sexual activity in the first place. Meanwhile, while educators are still fiddling with （ 胡乱摆弄 ） outdated “feel - good ” approaches, New York, Washington, and Los Angeles are burning. Youngsters are leaving school believing that matters of right and wrong are always merely subjective. If you pass a stranger on the street and decide to murder him because you need money —if it feels right —you go with that feeling. Clearly, murder is not taught in our schools, but such a conclusion —just about any conclusion —can be reached and justified using the decision-making method. It is time to consign （ 寄出 ） the fads （风尚 ） of “decision - making ” and “non- judgmentalism ” to the ash heap of failed policies, and return to a proved method. Character education provides a much more realistic approach to moral formation. It is built on an understanding that we learn morality not by debating it but by practicing it. Sample teachers worried about students leaving them

PDP性格测试(你是老虎还是孔雀)

性格测试,你是老虎、孔雀还是猫头鹰、变色龙.. 先试试回答以下的问题： 如果答案是非常同意，请给自己打5分； 如果是比较同意，则打4分； 如果是差不多，打3分； 如果只是有一点同意，请打2分； 如果答案是不同意，就打1分。 提醒你注意一点——回答问题时不是依据别人眼中的你来判断，而是你认为你本质上是不是这样的，看看问题吧： 1.你做事是一个值得信赖的人吗？ 非常同意比较同意差不多一点同意不同意 2.你个性温和吗？ 非常同意比较同意差不多一点同意不同意 3.你有活力吗？ 非常同意比较同意差不多一点同意不同意 4.你善解人意吗？ 非常同意比较同意差不多一点同意不同意 5.你独立吗？ 非常同意比较同意差不多一点同意不同意 6.你受人爱戴吗？ 非常同意比较同意差不多一点同意不同意 7.做事认真且正直吗？ 非常同意比较同意差不多一点同意不同意 8.你富有同情心吗？ 非常同意比较同意差不多一点同意不同意 9.你有说服力吗？ 非常同意比较同意差不多一点同意不同意 10.你大胆吗？ 非常同意比较同意差不多一点同意不同意 11.你精确吗？ 非常同意比较同意差不多一点同意不同意 12.你适应能力强吗？ 非常同意比较同意差不多一点同意不同意 13.你组织能力好吗？ 非常同意比较同意差不多一点同意不同意 14.你是否积极主动？ 非常同意比较同意差不多一点同意不同意 15.你害羞吗？ 非常同意比较同意差不多一点同意不同意 16.你强势吗？ 非常同意比较同意差不多一点同意不同意 17.你镇定吗？

非常同意比较同意差不多一点同意不同意 18.你勇于学习吗？ 非常同意比较同意差不多一点同意不同意 19.你反应快吗？ 非常同意比较同意差不多一点同意不同意 20.你外向吗？ 非常同意比较同意差不多一点同意不同意 21.你注意细节吗？ 非常同意比较同意差不多一点同意不同意 22.你爱说话吗？ 非常同意比较同意差不多一点同意不同意 23.你的协调能力好吗？ 非常同意比较同意差不多一点同意不同意 24.你勤劳吗？ 非常同意比较同意差不多一点同意不同意 25.你慷慨吗？ 非常同意比较同意差不多一点同意不同意26.你小心翼翼吗？ 非常同意比较同意差不多一点同意不同意27.你令人愉快吗？ 非常同意比较同意差不多一点同意不同意28.你传统吗？ 非常同意比较同意差不多一点同意不同意 29你亲切吗？ 非常同意比较同意差不多一点同意不同意 30.你工作足够有效率吗？ 非常同意比较同意差不多一点同意不同意 答案： 把第5、10、14、18、24、30题的分加起来就是你的“老虎”分数；把第3、6、13、20、22、29题的分加起来就是你的“孔雀”分数；

summary 范文

Original: My neighbor's children love playing hide-and-seek as all children do, but no one imagine that a game they played last week would be reported in the local newspaper. One afternoon, they were playing in the vacant lot down the corner. Young Paul, who is only five years old, found the perfect place to hide. His sister, Natalie, had shut her eyes and was counting to ten when Paul noticed the storage mail box at the corner and saw that the metal door was standing open. The mailman had just taken out several sacks of mail and had carried them to his truck which was standing at the curb a few feet away. Paul climbed into the storage box and pulled the door closed so hard that it locked. Soon realizing what he had done, he became frightened and started crying. Meanwhile, Natalie was looking for him everywhere but could not find him. It was lucky that she happened to pause at the corner for a minute and heard her brother's cries. She immediately ran to tell the mailman who hurried back from his truck to unlock the metal door. Paul was now free, but he had had such a bad scare that he could not stop crying. The mailman, however, soon found a way of making him laugh again. He told him that the next time he wanted to hide in a mail box, he should remember to put a stamp on himself! Summary: The children were playing hide-and-seek in a vacant lot one afternoon. Finding that the storage mailbox had been left open, Paul hid and locked himself in it accidentally. His sister, Natalie, heard his cries and realized where he was hiding, so she immediately told the mailman to unlock the metal door. After letting him out, the mailman made him stop crying by telling him to put a stamp on himself the next he wanted to hide in a mailbox. Original: Why do some animals die out? In the past two hundred years people have caused many kinds of animals to die out--to become extinct. People keep building houses and factories in fields and woods. As they spread over the land, they destroy animals' homes. If the animals can't find a place to live, they die out. Sixteen kinds of Hawaiian birds have become extinct for this reason. Other animals, such as the Florida Key deer, may soon die out because they are losing their homes.Hunters have caused some animals to become extinct, too. In the last century, hunters killed all the passenger pigeons in North America and most of the buffalos. Today they are fast killing off hawks and wolves. Pollution is killing many animals today, too. As rivers become polluted, fish are poisoned. Many die. Birds that eat the poisoned fish can't lay strong, healthy eggs. New birds aren’t born. So far, no animals have become extinct because of pollution. But some, such as the bald eagle and the brown pelican, have become rare and may die out. Scientists think that some animals become extinct because of changes in climate. The places where they live become hotter or cooler, drier or wetter. The food that they eat cannot grow there any more. If the animals can't learn to eat something else, they die. Dinosaurs may have died out for this reason. Summary:

老虎伤人时评汇总

第一周 时事评论 新闻事件 2016年7月23日下午，在北京延庆八达岭野生动物园内，两名自驾游女游客在猛兽区下车后，被老虎袭击，造成1死1伤。 据初步调查，事故发生在当事游客自驾车过程中，游客私自下车受到老虎攻击。详细情况正在进一步调查中。 发生事故的是一家四口，包括三个大人一个孩子，23日去八达岭野生动物园自驾游，车辆行驶至猛兽区的东北虎园里，年轻男女在车内发生口角，女子突然下车去拽男司机的车门，结果被蹿出来的老虎叼走。年长的女子看到年轻女子被叼走，立刻下车营救，被另外一只老虎当场咬死并拖走。 提炼观点 针对八达岭野生动物园老虎伤人事件，观点集中如下： 针对游客： 1、不作死就不会死，动物园无责任！

2、母老虎遭遇真老虎，最后发现自己是纸老虎！ 3、比老虎更可怕的，是对规则的蔑视 4、明知山有虎，偏向虎山行！ 5、任性的后果 针对监管部门： 1、不愧是野生动物园，保持动物野性做的不错，值得 一去！ 2、不要杀老虎，老虎是无辜的！ 3、监管部门难辞其咎！ 有水就有岸，岸阻遏了水的自在流淌，也避免了水的泛滥成灾；水需要岸的善加疏导，却排斥岸的恶意围困。 请以“水与岸”为话题，写一篇议论文。 水在轻轻地流，岸静静地守在旁边，一切是那样的和谐而美好。渐渐地，水厌倦了岸的围困，想寻找

没有约束的自由，冲垮了堤岸。水没有得到自由却失去了生命，而岸没有了水，也失去了存在的价值。 淇则有岸，隰则有泮 诗经云：“淇则有岸，隰则有泮。”汤汤淇水，一泻千里，若无岸无畔，岂不泛滥成灾？幸而这汤汤之水终有度，河岸阻遏了河水的浩瀚汹涌。[开篇引《诗经》名句点题，又恰如其分的道出水与岸的关系，既显出文章的不凡，又看出作者不俗的写作功力。] 河水的放荡有岸来约束，人事的不羁就要靠心中的度量来持平了，否则，后果堪虑。[由水与岸自然联系到社会中的人事，好！] 文章赏析 比老虎更可怕的，是一个人对规则的蔑视 又看了个血淋淋的新闻，主题笔者管它叫“当母老虎遇到真老虎”：某女在八达岭野生动物园跟老公发生口角，一言不和就下车去拉老公车门，瞬间就被老虎拖

一篇英语summary范文英语Summary写

一篇英语summary范文英语Summary写第一步：阅读 A.认真阅读给定的原文材料。如果一遍不能理解，就多读两遍。阅读次数越多，你对原文的理解就越深刻。 B.给摘要起一个标题。用那些能概括文章主题思想的单词、短语或短句子作为标题。也可以采用文中的主题句作为标题。主题句往往出现在文章的开头或结尾。一个好标题有助于确定文章的中心思想。 C.现在，就该决定原文中哪些部分重要，哪些部分次重要了。对重要部分的主要观点进行概括。 D.简要地记下主要观点——主题、标题、细节等你认为对概括摘要重要的东西。 第二步：动手写作 A. 摘要应该只有原文的三分之一或四分之一长。因此首先数一下原文的字数，然后除以三，得到一个数字。摘要的字数可以少于这个数字，但是千万不能超过这个数字。

B. 摘要应全部用自己的话完成。不要引用原文的句子。 C. 应该遵循原文的逻辑顺序。这样你就不必重新组织观点、事实。 D. 摘要必须全面、清晰地表明原文所载的信息，以便你的读者不需翻阅原文就可以完全掌握材料的原意。 E. 写摘要时可以采用下列几种小技巧： 1) 删除细节。只保留主要观点。 2) 选择一至两个例子。原文中可能包括5个或更多的例子，你只需从中筛选一至二个例子。 3) 把长段的描述变成短小、简单的句子。如果材料中描述某人或某事用了十个句子，那么你只要把它们变成一两句即可。 4) 避免重复。在原文中，为了强调某个主题，可能会重复论证说明。但是这在摘要中是不能使用的。应该删除那些突出强调的重述句。

5) 压缩长的句子。如下列两例： “His courage in battle might without exaggeration be called lion-like.” 可以概括为：”He was very brave in battle.” “He was hard up for money and was being pressed by his creditor.”可以概括为：“He was in financial difficulties.” 6) 你还可以使用词组代替整句或者从句。请看下面的例子： “Beautiful mountains like Mount Tai, Lushan Mountain, and Mount Huang, were visited by only a few people in the past. Today, better wages, holidays with pay, new hotels on these mountains, and better train and bus services, have brought them within reach of many who never thought of visiting them ten years ago.”

六种女人是老虎

六种女人是老虎 周末出门坐在地铁里，不远处一个小伙子的MP3声音很大，放的是一首多年前的歌，听着很有趣。歌词记不准了，大概是这样：小和尚下山去化斋，老和尚有交待：山下的女人是老虎，遇见了千万要躲开。走过了一村又一寨，小和尚暗思揣：为什么老虎不吃人，模样还挺可爱？老和尚悄悄告徒弟：这样的老虎最厉害，小和尚吓得赶紧跑，师傅呀，坏坏坏，老虎已闯进我的心里来。大概是现在的小年轻没听过这首歌，有个小姑娘听着听着扑哧笑了。过了一会儿，车厢里热闹起来，一对恋人，也可能是小夫妻，不知何故吵了起来，从最初的小声私语渐渐变成大声争吵，最后恶语相向，车厢里洒下一片标准的京骂，众人侧目。 吵了大概两站地，男的大概有点招架不住众人投过去的目光，撇下一句话下车去了：“我不跟你这母老虎吵，我走！”男子下车去了，不料那女的没吵过瘾，跟着追了过去。见两人离去，车也动了，有个中年人笑呵呵说道：“嗨，还真是个母老虎，搁谁身上也受不了哇。” 刚刚听完《女人是老虎》，就见到了一个颇有点虎劲的女子，我觉得很有趣。女人被形容为老虎，应该不是一件愉悦的事，相信每个女人也都不愿意成为别人眼里的

老虎；不过很多时候，不管是有心还是无意，女人总难免在某些事情上或者某些时刻，成为令人敬而远之的老虎，非但不可爱，而且很可怕。 女人是生活里的风景，能让人觉得赏心悦目，对一个女人来说，是一件幸福而又得意的事。因为女人是风景，所以要有风景的格调，要有独好的境界，而不能让自己成为令人望而却步的老虎。 赢得爱，首先在于自己可爱；要想让自己可爱，就不要做那些不可爱的事。 控制欲太强的女人是老虎 女人固然需要独立和自强，不过更多时候，女人需要有些柔弱气质，这并非让女人以弱者的姿态主动示弱，而是要充分展示女人的柔和秀美，而不要总是霸气十足，总是喜欢控制身边的人。和控制欲极强的女人生活在一起，就好像跟一头老虎呆在同一个笼子里一样，即便不胆战心惊，也不会觉得幸福快乐。 猜忌心太重的女人是老虎 两个人一起过日子，女人不可能真的心宽到对什么都不在乎，但疑心过重，什么时候都不放心，什么时候都绷得过紧，就不是好事了。猜疑之心是紧箍咒，戴在自己头上也戴在对方头上，归根结底戴在婚姻和生活头上。不仅家庭生活如此，就算是朋友之间的交往，如果疑心

英文Summary写作方法、范例及常用句式

摘要是对一篇文章的主题思想的简单陈述。它用最简洁的语言概括了原文的主题。写摘要主要包括三个步骤：（1）阅读；（2）写作；（3）修改成文。 第一步：阅读 A．认真阅读给定的原文材料。如果一遍不能理解，就多读两遍。阅读次数越多，你对原文的理解就越深刻。 B．给摘要起一个标题。用那些能概括文章主题思想的单词、短语或短句子作为标题。也可以采用文中的主题句作为标题。主题句往往出现在文章的开头或结尾。一个好标题有助于确定文章的中心思想。C．现在，就该决定原文中哪些部分重要，哪些部分次重要了。对重要部分的主要观点进行概括。 D．简要地记下主要观点——主题、标题、细节等你认为对概括摘要重要的东西。 第二步：动手写作 A. 摘要应该只有原文的三分之一或四分之一长。因此首先数一下原文的字数，然后除以三，得到一个数字。摘要的字数可以少于这个数字，但是千万不能超过这个数字。 B. 摘要应全部用自己的话完成。不要引用原文的句子。 C. 应该遵循原文的逻辑顺序。这样你就不必重新组织观点、事实。 D. 摘要必须全面、清晰地表明原文所载的信息，以便你的读者不需翻阅原文就可以完全掌握材料的原意。 1 / 19

E. 写摘要时可以采用下列几种小技巧： 1) 删除细节。只保留主要观点。 2) 选择一至两个例子。原文中可能包括5个或更多的例子，你只需从中筛选一至二个例子。 3) 把长段的描述变成短小、简单的句子。如果材料中描述某人或某事用了十个句子，那么你只要把它们变成一两句即可。 4) 避免重复。在原文中，为了强调某个主题，可能会重复论证说明。但是这在摘要中是不能使用的。应该删除那些突出强调的重述句。 5) 压缩长的句子。如下列两例： “His courage in battle might without exaggeration be called lion-like.” 可以概括为：”He was very brave in battle.” “He was hard up for money and was being pressed by his creditor.” 可以概括为：“He was in financial difficulties.” 6) 你还可以使用词组代替整句或者从句。请看下面的例子：“Beautiful mountains like Mount Tai, Lushan Mountain, and Mount Huang, were visited by only a few people in the past. Today, better wages, holidays with pay, new hotels on these mountains, and better train and bus services, have brought them within reach of many who never thought of visiting them ten years ago.” 2 / 19

老虎的知识

老虎的知识 虎是大自然的杰作。它属于哺乳纲猫科动物，是此物种中个体最大、最凶猛的兽中之王。早在250万年前，虎就活跃于远古蛮荒的世界，使寂静的宇宙一片辉煌。人们从虎身上得到了启发，给它以文化意蕴，和它在斗争中共同创造了世界。 虎祟拜的深远渊源 虎，作为一种猛兽和古代图腾崇拜物，是勇猛精进、雄强威武的象征，它是兽中之王、镇山之王，古称“山君”或“圣兽”。它黄质黑章，锯牙钩爪，体重千斤，斑斓健美，吼声如雷，百兽震恐，被我国历代人民奉为山神。中华民族具有悠久的文化历史，其中龙虎文化起源最早，它源于远古自然崇拜和图腾崇拜，与我国初民原始文化共生并存。1975年6月，在河南濮阳西水坡原始墓葬中所发现的蚌塑龙虎图形距今有六七千年的历史，被称为“天下第一龙虎”或“中华第一龙虎”，说明在原始氏族社会晚期的信仰中，不只有了龙神，而且有了虎神，龙虎文化已同时存在。虎作为凶猛的野兽与原始狩猎民族生产生活关系更为密切，要比虚构的龙图腾崇拜物产生的更早。亚洲是老虎的原产地，中国是虎文化的发祥地。 中国崇虎观念从远古旧、新石器时期的虎岩画到史前文明的伏羲时代初见盛行，并形成虎图腾崇拜，已有近万年历

史。此后历经炎黄时代升华为龙虎文化，通过夏、商、周三代更进入虎文化繁荣期，表现形式丰富多彩。夏人崇虎，殷商以前的夏家店文化的彩陶上便有虎头纹。商代社会已由狩猎时期进入农业社会，但重视虎的图腾观念有增无减。更多形式的崇虎观念表现为这一时期青铜器中的龙虎尊、饕餮纹、玉虎佩饰等艺术造型上。 虎圈腾崇拜 “图腾”一语是美洲印第安人的土语，是指某一原始氏族所奉为祖先、保护神及象征氏族团结标志的某种动物，当然也有奉某种植物或无生物为图腾的，但为数较少，因为远古狩猎民族所赖以为生的主要是动物。在原始森林中世世代代与猛兽格斗的中华民族原始猎民，自然崇奉山中之王——老虎，并尊之为图腾神，所以，发源于我国西北黄土高原的华夏族，自古便以龙虎为图腾崇拜对象。 中国本土，远古起源于西北羌族的虎图腾崇拜开始，随着民族的迁徙向西南、中原、东南、东北发展，可以看出虎图腾崇拜传播、发展、流变的种种迹象。虎图腾崇拜不只是西南少数民族的信仰，也是全国各族人民的普遍信仰。由于地区、民族和文化遗传因素各有不同，所表现的虎图腾文化形态也互有交流和差别。 虎伏羲说的提出。有学者提出，虎伏羲、龙女娲的远古图腾构成了中国龙虎文化的文明传统。伏羲本为原始虎图

【男欢女爱】女人“三十如狼四十似虎”的真相

【男欢女爱】女人“三十如狼四十似虎”的真相 导语：女人一旦过了25岁，她们求子的本能就遭到了挑战。随着年龄的增加，女性卵子受孕的机会也越来越小。因此中年妇女对性爱的渴求也就水涨船高。男人欺骗他们的配偶后，总是喜欢用这样一套权措辞：是动物的本能进化程序让我这么做的。特别是近几年，许多文章表明：男人到处寻花问柳是因为兽性的进化设定了他们去不断寻找生育力强、更合适、更年轻的子宫。那么女人呢？如果真的是进化促使男人去拈花惹草，那么是什么影响女人的性欲呢？请看德克萨斯大学的心理学家David Buss以及他的三位毕业生助手（Judith Easton，Jaime Confer and Cari Goetz）7月份发表在Personality and Individual Differences的一篇文章（以下是摘要）：30岁到40岁出头的女性比更年轻的女性的性欲更强烈。而27到45年龄段的女性比18 到26岁的女性不仅拥有更多、更强烈的性幻想，而且拥有更多的性生活以及持续时间。她们比更年轻的女性更愿意拥有偶然的性经历，甚至是一夜情。换句话说，尽管美国人民都觉得大学女生是淫乱放纵的代名词，但事实上中年女性在性方面才是美国最勤勤恳恳的劳模。进化同样促使女性去寻求更多的性行为，因为她们的生育力开始下降，并且她们即将进入更年期。以下是他们的理论：由于各种疾病、饥饿、

战争等因素，古代女性已经习惯了自己的孩子里可能多达半数都会夭折的现实，这一心理创伤使得她们对下一代抱着越多越好的态度。当她们还只有十几二十岁的时候，即使做爱次数有限，她们还是很容易怀孕。但过了25岁，她们求子的本能就遭到了挑战。随着年龄的增加，女性卵子受孕的机会也越来越小。因此中年妇女对性爱的渴求也就水涨船高。 欢迎您走进冬韵如歌的个人图书馆--冬韵如歌

性格测试(你是老虎还是孔雀)教学总结

性格测试(你是老虎还 是孔雀)

性格测试,你是老虎、孔雀还是猫头鹰、变色龙.. 先试试回答以下的问题： 如果答案是非常同意，请给自己打5分； 如果是比较同意，则打4分； 如果是差不多，打3分； 如果只是有一点同意，请打2分； 如果答案是不同意，就打1分。 提醒你注意一点——回答问题时不是依据别人眼中的你来判断，而是你认为你本质上是不是这样的，看看问题吧： 1.你做事是一个值得信赖的人吗？ 非常同意比较同意差不多一点同意不同意 2.你个性温和吗？ 非常同意比较同意差不多一点同意不同意 3.你有活力吗？ 非常同意比较同意差不多一点同意不同意 4.你善解人意吗？ 非常同意比较同意差不多一点同意不同意 5.你独立吗？ 非常同意比较同意差不多一点同意不同意 6.你受人爱戴吗？ 非常同意比较同意差不多一点同意不同意

7.做事认真且正直吗？ 非常同意比较同意差不多一点同意不同意8.你富有同情心吗？ 非常同意比较同意差不多一点同意不同意9.你有说服力吗？ 非常同意比较同意差不多一点同意不同意10.你大胆吗？ 非常同意比较同意差不多一点同意不同意11.你精确吗？ 非常同意比较同意差不多一点同意不同意12.你适应能力强吗？ 非常同意比较同意差不多一点同意不同意13.你组织能力好吗？ 非常同意比较同意差不多一点同意不同意14.你是否积极主动？ 非常同意比较同意差不多一点同意不同意15.你害羞吗？ 非常同意比较同意差不多一点同意不同意16.你强势吗？ 非常同意比较同意差不多一点同意不同意17.你镇定吗？ 非常同意比较同意差不多一点同意不同意18.你勇于学习吗？

非常同意比较同意差不多一点同意不同意19.你反应快吗？ 非常同意比较同意差不多一点同意不同意20.你外向吗？ 非常同意比较同意差不多一点同意不同意21.你注意细节吗？ 非常同意比较同意差不多一点同意不同意22.你爱说话吗？ 非常同意比较同意差不多一点同意不同意23.你的协调能力好吗？ 非常同意比较同意差不多一点同意不同意24.你勤劳吗？ 非常同意比较同意差不多一点同意不同意25.你慷慨吗？ 非常同意比较同意差不多一点同意不同意26.你小心翼翼吗？ 非常同意比较同意差不多一点同意不同意27.你令人愉快吗？ 非常同意比较同意差不多一点同意不同意28.你传统吗？ 非常同意比较同意差不多一点同意不同意29你亲切吗？ 非常同意比较同意差不多一点同意不同意

The lady or the tiger中文翻译(美女还是老虎)

很久很久以前，在一个未开化的国家里，有个圆形的竞技场——这是国王审判犯人的地方。竞技场内有两扇门，一扇门关着饥饿不堪的老虎，一扇门关着绝世美女。一切交给老天爷决定。国王相信如果犯人无罪，他应该会幸运选到美女，选到美女的则马上在竞技场内举行盛大的婚礼，然后带美女远走高飞过幸福的日子；而选到老虎的人，则马上会被老虎咬死。 国王有个美丽的女儿，偏偏爱上一个平民青年。国家规定王室跟平民相恋是有罪的。所以国王发现后愤怒不已，把这名平民关起来并抓到竞技场。同样的，一扇门内关了老虎，一扇门内关了一位美女。这样无论他选择哪个门都不可能再与公主在一起，这样国王就可以放心了。 全国的人们涌入竞技场观看，国王在场，公主也在场。公主事前就已经知道哪一扇门后面是老虎，哪一扇门是美女。她在看台上，脸色苍白。青年望了她一眼，他知道公主一定知道两扇门的秘密，他渴望公主给他一个方向。然而，公主的内心挣扎万分。她认识门后的那位美女，那是宫中最美丽的女仆。她无法忘怀相爱的点滴，无法接受他与美女远走高飞，重新生活，却也不愿看到心爱的人死亡。 所以她想了很久很久…… 终于，她微指了右边的那扇门。青年于是慢慢走向了右边那扇门，所有人都屏息以待门被打开的结果。公主却缓缓地走出了竞技场…… 在这个竞技场上，接受审判的并不仅仅只是青年，还有那位公主以及他们之间的爱情。 无论公主选择什么都将只有一种结局——她不可能再拥有他。一个深爱着却不能在一起的人，宁愿让他死去，还是看着他与另一女子生活？ 而场上的青年，真是个傻得可爱的男子。一个用自己的生命去相信自己恋人的男子，一个不用任何博弈的心态来面对爱情的男子。他本能地相信，本能地顺从了心灵的指引,毫无怀疑，毫无戒备，毫无犹豫。 公主是矛盾的，当她纤细的手臂缓缓地抬起暗示男子时，她知道，她的任何决定都是种残忍的了断，唯一不同的不过是她将承受何种煎熬。She had lost him, who should have him? 青年走得很坚定，因为他知道无论门的背后等待他的是老虎还是美女，他走的每一步都携带着她们之间的回忆，太重太重，却愈行愈远…… 译文如下，水平有限，仅供参考： Long ago, in the very olden time, there lived a powerful king. Some of his ideas were progressive. But others caused people to suffer. 很久以前，在一个非常古老的国家，那里住着一位非常有权势的国王。他的一些想法是非常先进的，但其他大部分的却让人们痛苦不堪。 One of the king's ideas was a public arena as an agent of poetic justice. Crime

英文summary写作范例教学提纲

英文s u m m a r y写作范 例

Article Children Must be Taught to Tell Right from Wrong William Kilpatrick Many of today’s young people have a difficult time seeing any moral dimension (道德层面) to their actions. There are a number of reasons why that’s true, but none m ore prominent than a failed system of education that eschews (回避) teaching children the traditional moral values that bind Americans together as a society and a culture. That failed approach, called “decision-making,” was introduced in schools 25 years ago. It tells children to decide for themselves what is right and what is wrong. It replaced “character education. (品格教育)” Character education didn’t ask children to reinvent the moral wheel (浪费时间重新发明早已存在的道德标准); instead, it encouraged them to practice habits of courage, justice and self-control. In the 1940s, when a character education approach prevailed, teachers worried about students chewing gum; today they worry about robbery and rape. Decision-making curriculums pose thorny (棘手的) ethical dilemmas to students, leaving them with the impression that all morality is problematic and that all questions of right and wrong are in dispute. Youngsters are forced to question values and virtues they’ve never acquired in the first place or upon which they have only a tenuous (薄弱的) hold. The assumption behind this method is that students will arrive at good moral conclusions if only they are given the chance. But the actual result is moral confusion. For example, a recent national study of 1,700 sixth- to ninth-graders revealed that a majority of boys considered rape to be acceptable under certain conditions. Astoundingly, many of the girls agreed. This kind of moral illiteracy is further encouraged by values-education (价值观教育) programs that are little more than courses in self-esteem (自尊). These programs are based on the questionable assumption that a child who feels good about himself or herself won’t want to do anything wrong. But it is just as reasonable to make an opposite assumption: namely, that a child who has uncritical self-regard will conclude that he or she can’t do anything bad. Such naive self-acceptance results in large part from the non-directive (无指导性的), non-judgmental (无是非观的), as-long-as-you-feel-comfortable-with-your-choices mentality (思想) that has pervaded (渗透) public education for the last two and one-half decades. Many of today’s drug education, sex education and values-education courses are based on the same 1960s philosophy that helped fuel the explosion in teen drug use and sexual activity in the first place. Meanwhile, while educators are still fiddling with (胡乱摆弄) outdated “feel-good” approaches, New York, Washington, and Los Angeles are burning. Youngsters are leaving school believing that matters of right and wrong are always merely subjective. If you pass a stranger on the street and decide to murder him because you need money—if it feels right—you go with that feeling. Clearly, murder is not taught in our schools, but such a conclusion—just about any conclusion—can be reached and justified using the decision-making method. It is time to consign (寄出) the fads (风尚) of “decision-making” and “non-judgmentalism” to the ash heap of failed policies, and return to a proved method. Character education provides a much more realistic approach to moral formation. It is built on an understanding that we learn morality not by debating it but by practicing it.